brevity wrote: » I'm sure I'm being a bit of a drama lallana but I don't have much confidence the business we've done/doing so far.
googled eyes wrote: » Tim Pearson - Anyone know if he's reliable?
Gbear wrote: » I find it pretty damned exciting. Granted, the last time we had 130m odd to spend it was a catastrophe but I trust Bren and the lads a lot more than Commolli. And the risk isn't what it was then either because we're building on top of quality, instead of muck. Lallana, while maybe overpriced, feels like he'll be good at this level. It's as safe a signing as you're going to get and I feel that the extra cash is worth it for the relatively guaranteed quality. He mightn't hit the heights of some precocious tiny latin fella but he feels like he's going to be solid. Markovich (assuming things go to plan and he signs in the next couple of days) looks a serious prospect. Pace, dribbling, work rate. Rodgers can work wonders with that mix, as we've already seen. Can is a safe bet for the money we're paying. He already looks like he'll be more useful than Lucas and there looks like there's a lot of potential there. Lambert is a classy footballer and again, it's a cheap short term option. Think of him as an upgrade on Aspas. Origi is something to sit on the back burner until next season. So that's 70m quid's worth and that's with 3 more signings we're looking at - another 15-20m CB, a 10-15m LB and a 25m+ attacker. If we pull through on those last 3 signigns (and they're actually worth the sort of money we've looked like spending on them) that's as exciting a transfer window as we've had in my lifetime.
daithijjj wrote: » Good vid on Lallana here, basically him on the ball for 10 mins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qDOq15RDuM
John__Percy #lfc are considering a bid for Swansea left-back Ben Davies after making an inquiry this week. #thfc also remain interested
Gbear wrote: » Well he's certainly fond of the Cruyff turn. More pace than I assumed as well. Not the sort to burn past superfast full backs but it's pace on the ball which is even better.
mav79 wrote: » Ben Davies would be better than Bertrand, but still not a big upgrade on what we have at the club.
bitemeluis wrote: » Kuyt showing exactly why some were happy hes gone - not being able to find a pass from 10 yards is a crime at that level
Nuri Sahin wrote: » Your hatred for Dirk is bizarre.
Techniques07 wrote: » EDIT: If we had a few more players with his attitude last season we'd have won the league
Techniques07 wrote: » Many a point liverpool earned because of his hard work. He may not have been the most technically gifted, but he worked hard making important tackles in defence and scoring important goals at the other end. He came to liverpool as a goal scoring striker and never complained about being pushed out onto the wing, he just got on with it. I really don't understand how any liverpool fan can have any bad feeling towards the guy. I'm proud to have seen him in a liverpool shirt and wish him well in his career. EDIT: If we had a few more players with his attitude last season we'd have won the league
shamrock55 wrote: » I like dirk and want him to do well but his passing and ball controle when playing for liverpool used to infuriate me
naughtb4 wrote: » Kuyt is such a smart adaptable player. Great great example to players everywhere, miss the guy myself.
Nuri Sahin wrote: » And that's fair enough, and something I'd agree to myself, but given his past and present comments (here and in tonight's match thread) on Dirk, he seems to have a irrational hatred for him.
bitemeluis wrote: » lol "irrational" - seems like a big word for you - are you a writer Sahin, a pundit? :pac::pac::pac::pac:
bitemeluis wrote: » lol - I dont think its a coincidence we start to do better after he left - he's a donkey, runs around a lot, if you need a donkey in your team then hes your man - thankfully BR sees it that way too
Nuri Sahin wrote: » You remind me of someone, but I shall say no more.
