nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Boards.ie Voting History Discussion

ctrl-alt-delete

Trying to keep the other thread just for posting the actual vote outcomes and such.

Obviously we can discuss each individual vote on each vote thread in future as we have done so far.

I am of the opinion we are having too many votes :pac:

For instance we have voted on the Login rule twice now, with the outcome on both occasions being to reduce it to 21 days, yet we still have another thread and vote going on it again that has not expired yet.

Anyways, with Mac only being able to change 2 rules once a season we can discuss what should take priority here for next season and also how we feel the current changes have affected the game.

What does everyone or anyone think?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

KERSPLAT!

Iago wrote: »

I accept that the account thing was an oversight, but I do think it points to a desire to find something, anything, to turn the vote around. Maybe that's because of the aforementioned lack of transparency, I don't know. Only you know for sure.

Maybe so, I don't even know myself

As for the rest, they are all fair points and I do mostly agree with them. We just have different beliefs on how much cheating was, is or will happen, which again is fair enough

KERSPLAT!

Contacted Seamo87, his vote can be marked void. He's no longer in the boards league

Iago

KERSPLAT! wrote: »

Maybe so, I don't even know myself

As for the rest, they are all fair points and I do mostly agree with them. We just have different beliefs on how much cheating was, is or will happen, which again is fair enough

I'll tell you what, give me Aguero for Dzagoev & one of my youths and I'll switch my vote to yes.

Do it quickly before they turn monitoring back on though, it'll be our little secret

KERSPLAT!

I'll raffle Aguero off between anyone who votes yes... :P

KERSPLAT!

No idea who ahnowbrowncow is either, atleast it looks like we're closing

KERSPLAT!

ctrl-alt-delete wrote: »

I think the above it correct at time of posting :pac:

It is tough going this.

GT_TDI_150

ctrl-alt-delete wrote: »

I think the above it correct at time of posting :pac:

It is tough going this.

slight discrepancy in the maths

ctrl-alt-delete

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

slight discrepancy in the maths

Not at all, what do you take me for, count it up yourself!

Just throwing this out there, but I think the bold blue voters should count double.

pepper180

So if someone gets banned... Does that mean their vote that they already casted still counts?...

My name is URL

Sorry if there was any annoyance caused by the casting of a vote with my account. I've never even played this game!

Housemate said it was him that placed the vote while logged in with my account. He doesn't have an account on Boards but plays the game. He reads this and other SM forums from time to time and didn't realise he was logged in as me when he came across this thread, and just voted thinking it was an open poll.

I might log out when I leave the computer from now on. The bollix could have voted or posted in far more embarrassing threads than this ಠ_ಠ

tupac_healy

pepper180 wrote: »

So if someone gets banned... Does that mean their vote that they already casted still counts?...

Fair point.....

I've mentioned this on past occasion and personally I don't see why a banned person should have any view on any matter on the site??? They were affored the privilege whilst an active member but gave up that right when banned...

It's STILL an active vote and that being the case how can a banned member have any view/influence on such?

Others will disagree but banned members have no say in active GW matters IMO

GT_TDI_150

tupac_healy wrote: »

Fair point.....

I've mentioned this on past occasion and personally I don't see why a banned person should have any view on any matter on the site??? They were affored the privilege whilst an active member but gave up that right when banned...

It's STILL an active vote and that being the case how can a banned member have any view/influence on such?

Others will disagree but banned members have no say in active GW matters IMO

look, he voted before he got banned ... i think this vote should stand ...

He obviously wont be able to vote / contribute on any matter going forward, but this one was cast before he got banned.

If you die of a heart attack in after sinking the ballot paper in the ballot box in a general election yourvote still stands ... ***

***may be a little dramatic but you get my point

KERSPLAT!

DVD or whatever his name is just got back to me, he's Newcastle in the Copa and must have thought this vote was in relation to that. No harm done. Vote is void

pepper180

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

look, he voted before he got banned ... i think this vote should stand ...

He obviously wont be able to vote / contribute on any matter going forward, but this one was cast before he got banned.

Ok so..

What if..

1.Someone joins the league now..

2.Then votes right away..

3.The quits in a week or two..

Does that mean their vote is still counted?

Al Capwned

....

tupac_healy

GT_TDI_150 wrote: »

look, he voted before he got banned ... i think this vote should stand ...

He obviously wont be able to vote / contribute on any matter going forward, but this one was cast before he got banned.

If you die of a heart attack in after sinking the ballot paper in the ballot box in a general election yourvote still stands ... ***

***may be a little dramatic but you get my point

I'm assuming the person that 'died' was entitled to a vote in the first place and not done something to exclude himself from the vote beforehand....

Ahem.....

Like some

ctrl-alt-delete

pepper180 wrote: »

Ok so..

What if..

1.Someone joins the league now..

2.Then votes right away..

3.The quits in a week or two..

Does that mean their vote is still counted?

Mac did say something somewhere about new managers and their voting rights, can't remember what or find it as I am on my phone.

As for them leaving, it is up to Mac and Wilberto to come up with something regarding that, I think Wilberto will validate all the votes at the end of the poll.

As for the other issue above, the manager in question still plays the game and at the time of his vote had a voting right.

Again not for me to decide but I feel it should count, obviously he has lost his voting rights for all future votes.

Anyways plenty of time for Mac and Wilberto to decide before they review it at the end of the poll.

GT_TDI_150

pepper180 wrote: »

Ok so..

What if..

1.Someone joins the league now..

2.Then votes right away..

3.The quits in a week or two..

Does that mean their vote is still counted?

No because mac called that out

JamboMac

My name is URL wrote: »

Sorry if there was any annoyance caused by the casting of a vote with my account. I've never even played this game!

Housemate said it was him that placed the vote while logged in with my account. He doesn't have an account on Boards but plays the game. He reads this and other SM forums from time to time and didn't realise he was logged in as me when he came across this thread, and just voted thinking it was an open poll.

I might log out when I leave the computer from now on. The bollix could have voted or posted in far more embarrassing threads than this ಠ_ಠ

So it's 13 all as this vote doesn't count, am in right in that?

ctrl-alt-delete

JamboMac wrote: »

So it's 13 all as this vote doesn't count, am in right in that?

No, a few that voted to switch it back on are not legit.

Burlap_Sack

We need a poll to decide how to do a legit poll:pac:

Al Capwned

Burlap_Sack wrote: »

We need a poll to decide how to do a legit poll:pac:

With all available options in a table.
Don't forget the table! :pac: