kneemos wrote: » And yet I've been insulted and called all sorts?
richy wrote: » wtf does that consultant know about the ability to test drugs in a nightclub.
richy wrote: » They do it in many countries especially at festivals and very successfully too. People are gonna do drugs no matter what. Last year at electric they made a big announcement to not to take the green Rolex. People still did because it's all they had and they thought it would never happen to them.
richy wrote: » Two people died if I remember correctly. May not have happened if there was a prosecution free area where you could get your pills tested.
pundy wrote: » if you don't smoke it, then just stay out of the argument really, cos you wont have a clue what you're on about at all, cos you'd be basing your flawed opinions of cannabis on the ideas of a crank who is paid to spout lies on a corrupted governments tv station.
what it takes wrote: » I'm not an expert but is cannabis anymore harmful than alcohol, rarely see two stoners beating the crap out of each other (great Bill Hicks joke). Yes it has side effects like alcohol and cigarettes, you have to exercise personal responsibility. Proper researched debated will go a long way not some dragnet like rhetoric about how the mary jane is screwin' the kids up man.
DamagedTrax wrote: » exactly. feckin sausages will do you damage if you eat enough of them.
pundy wrote: » what exactly is that?
blackwhite wrote: » Victim blaming. You implied that "he asked for it". Doesn't justify the ****ty behavior of those who prefer to name-call and abuse instead of debating the point.
pundy wrote: » why are you getting involved? to troll about someone getting slagged? are you implying that i have the same mindset as a rapist? how is he a victim anyway? you absolute freakshow
blackwhite wrote: » Nice ninja edit. Reported it before you did though.
Davarus Walrus wrote: » This must be the infamous irritability too much cannabis causes..
pundy wrote: » same way i reported you for implying i was some sort of rapist. you're fvcking disgusting.
blackwhite wrote: » Where did I imply you were a rapist? I said you trying to claim it's ok to abuse someone because they disagreed with you was the equivalent of a rapist blaming their victim's choice of clothes - i.e. equally as ridiculous. If you're unable to debate without resorting to name-calling and personal abuse then it really says a lot about you.
I Heart Internet wrote: » A lot. He's a trained medical doctor with a professional interest (over 20 years he said) in the impact of "nightlife" (for want of a better word) on people's health. He explained in some detail the laboratory process of testing pills and the shifting nature of their components. He was convinced that this could never be replicated in a club setting. They sound like retards to me. "Don't eat the poison." "But it's all I have." "Really, don't eat the poison, its poisonous!" "I'm gonna have to eat it anyway." So a warning wasn't good enough to prevent people from eating poison, but you expect people to use test kits and take those results seriously and then not eat them. I doubt they have the required intelligence...
pundy wrote: » you fvcking started it you thick idiot, YOU personally abused me by calling me a rapist.
blackwhite wrote: » I didn't call you a rapist. Quote me the post where I said that.
richy wrote: » Impact of nightlife I imagine has to do with excess alcohol/drugs and dangerous tainted drugs. I have no doubt he is am expert in saving life's but I can tell you he knows nothin about the ability to do on site tests of pills etc for contaniments because it can and does happen and it saves lives. From am article I can't link because I don't hack enough comments "THE RECENT death of a teenager after taking Ecstasy at a "house" party in Blackpool was greeted with resigned dismay by Safe House, the Dutch drug-testing scheme which has virtually eliminated the dangers of taking the designer drug." If you wanna read the article yourself and get informed google Dutch ravers can mellow out as official tests make Ecstasy 'safe' the article is buy the uk independent paper. The authorities in these countries are so far ahead of us in terms of making drug use safer it is embarrassing. People lose their lives because of the general publics ignorance. It may be a stupid decision to take a drug which may possibly be tainted but a very small percentage of the pills were tainted and they just got unlucky. I don't think they deserve to die because they "sound like regress". Their is no reason for ignorance with the whole internet at your finger tips.
pundy wrote: » and you can surely understand why it is frustrating to people who DO know and have bothered to read the research, and who DO smoke the stuff to be met with the usual irish-mentality "save the children" sh!t every single time a drug is mentioned on here. if you don't smoke it, then just stay out of the argument really, cos you wont have a clue what you're on about at all, cos you'd be basing your flawed opinions of cannabis on the ideas of a crank who is paid to spout lies on a corrupted governments tv station.
richy wrote: » I love the way I heart internet calls people who died because of taking possibly tainted drugs are retards and Black white likes the comment but black White got his feelings hurt by a bad word and alerted the mods. Someone needs to call wambulance for this pair.
I Heart Internet wrote: » Why are "experts" in the media and on telly always so wrong and know-it-alls on the internet always right?? Could it be that "experts" know stuff that biased drug-fans don't?
pundy wrote: » are we still not allowed call people out for being the T word??
I Heart Internet wrote: » People who ingest unknown substances are stupid. They are slower than the rest of us (who have survived thus far), yes. I'm sad when I hear that anyone has died due to ingesting or consuming illegal drugs and I dislike people who cheerlead for drug use knowing it can lead to such disasters.
