Iona vs Panti

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

i'm starting to really hate the term "Liberal" and especially "liberal agenda"

You left out the liberal fascists!

Sarky

I've been meaning to ask: How exactly is liberal fascism supposed to work?

Ash.J.Williams

Sarky wrote: »

I've been meaning to ask: How exactly is liberal fascism supposed to work?

when you say "i f**ing want equal rights for all nooooowwwwwww"

lazygal

Sarky wrote: »

I've been meaning to ask: How exactly is liberal fascism supposed to work?

Like militant atheism.

Nodin

Sarky wrote: »

I've been meaning to ask: How exactly is liberal fascism supposed to work?

'You will now all be gay or be taken out and shot'

Sarky

Oh. So mostly pub-time then.

lazygal

Nodin wrote: »

'You will now all be gay or be taken out and shot'

No, I think you'll find that's the homosexual agenda.

robindch

Sarky wrote: »

How exactly is liberal fascism supposed to work?

Far as I can make out from Popette and Alive, it seems that "liberal fascism" is what happens when you try to roll back religious privilege, stop tolerating religious prejudice, that kind of thing.

oceanclub

Anyone annoyed that an RTE discussion on the state's involvement in education should give undue preference (2/4 people) to a Catholic minority group should complain to complaints@rte.ie.

P.

i'm still waiting for my first complaint to be answered.

Bannasidhe

lazygal wrote: »

No, I think you'll find that's the homosexual agenda.

Noooo - The Homosexual Agenda is (male version) 'You will all be taken out and restyled or shot' and/or (female version) 'You will put up shelves and they will be sturdy and straight or you will be shot with a nail gun I got in Lidl/Aldi for tree fiddy.'

Links234

Sarky wrote: »

That's the same Jim Walsh who complained about how he can no longer call gay people "fairies", isn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Walsh_(politician)#Views

He's my girlfriend's home grown nutcase, herself being from Wexy, and he even mentioned her in one of his rants before about "persons known to be homosexual" leading a hate campaign against him :pac:

Links234 wrote: »

He's my girlfriend's home grown nutcase, herself being from Wexy, and he even mentioned her in one of his rants before about "persons known to be homosexual" leading a hate campaign against him :pac:

So they're good friends, right?

*Seriously though, what an assh*le to even vaguely refer to her?

Sarky

But he's totes not a homophobe, right?

I bet some of his best friends are gay

robindch

diddlybit wrote: »

I bet some of his best friends are gay

At this stage, I'm beginning to wonder about him:

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-big-questions/201106/homophobic-men-most-aroused-gay-male-porn

Next time he started homofabulating, somebody should watch his trousers.

Cabaal wrote: »

Its the same "will somebody think of the children" crazy argument put forward when it came to divorce in Ireland.

People claimed it would bring the downfall of society, it didn't.

Rather selfish to not think of the children.

Study: Children Of Divorced Parents Are More Likely To Be Unhappy And Feel Unfulfilled

http://elitedaily.com/news/world/study-children-of-divorced-parents-are-more-likely-to-be-unhappy-and-feel-unfulfilled/

Children Of Divorced Parents Are More Likely To End Their Own Marriages

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/26714.php

United States: Studies Show Children of Divorce Struggle with Relationships as Adults

http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/253612/divorce/Studies+Show+Children+of+Divorce+Struggle+with+Relationships+as+Adults

Children of divorced parents more likely to start smoking, study finds

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130314110251.htm

Kids Of Divorce And Suicide: New Study Shows Link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/24/divorce-and-suicidal-idea_n_812456.html

etc

Broken home children are 'five times more likely to suffer mental troubles'

Penncil Dick wrote: »

With respect, the wording of your posts has an undertone of distain for the person in question. That may not have been your intention and I wouldn't begin to suggest it was, but that's how it came across to a lot of people, myself included, as indicated by this post and the number of thanks it received (implying that people agreed with it)

This guy Rory is a drag queen so what is the problem with referring to this fact?

Replace "drag queen" with "Big Brother contestant" in everything I said and tell me if you still have a problem. Why/Why not?

If describing a public person by the reason they are public at all supposedly has undertones of homophobia I am glad this thing with Waters has happened to make people think twice about making false allegations again in public.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Rather selfish to not think of the children.

:rolleyes:
Even more selfish to not think of women,

I know a women who met a man in the 1950's, it was great at first but then the day after they got married she said something to him in the car that he didn't like and her new husband punched her in the face,

She endured years of abuse at the hands of the man she married, she received no support from priests and none from society at the time either...because of the catholic instilled view of marriage.

Eventually she was able to leave him as times thankfully changed,

Marriage back then made for better or worse and it didn't matter if worse was having seven shades of ****e beaten out of you,

Its like the abortion debate when it comes to people like you bb, lets think of the children but to hell with the women (or man, lets not forget men can be abused in a relationship as well).

Its no good keeping a relationship together for the sake of the children if both partys in the relationship hate each other, you honestly think that hatred won't affect the children? Seriously whats wrong with you?

Brown Bomber wrote: »

This guy Rory is a drag queen so what is the problem with referring to this fact?

Replace "drag queen" with "Big Brother contestant" in everything I said and tell me if you still have a problem. Why/Why not?

If describing a public person by the reason they are public at all supposedly has undertones of homophobia I am glad this thing with Waters has happened to make people think twice about making false allegations again in public.

Great so from now on you'll also be saying "The Iona people" and "the chap that works for the Irish times"?

We'll all know who your on about and if you can't be arsed to use Rory's name I assume you can't be arsed to use anyone elses?

Delirium

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Rather selfish to not think of the children.

As someone who had their parents go through a divorce, I say thank you to all those that supported their right to end their toxic relationship.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Though thanks for sharing his name, Rory it is from now on.

I said this only 5 hours ago.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

This guy Rory is a drag queen so what is the problem with referring to this fact?

Replace "drag queen" with "Big Brother contestant" in everything I said and tell me if you still have a problem. Why/Why not?

If describing a public person by the reason they are public at all supposedly has undertones of homophobia I am glad this thing with Waters has happened to make people think twice about making false allegations again in public.

I think this issue was answered way, way back in this post

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=88741267&postcount=117

Penn

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Replace "drag queen" with "Big Brother contestant" in everything I said and tell me if you still have a problem. Why/Why not?

False equivalence.

You had already been told what his name was in this post which you responded to. Not only that, but your quote "nor do I care what drag queens say on what looks like an awful tv program" makes it sound like you're being dismissive of this man's opinions based on the fact that he is a drag queen, as opposed to being a gay man who is a popular and well-liked figure in the gay community on a TV show where in the section of the interview in question, he was talking about issues relating to gay people. Dismissing his extremely valuable and knowledgeable opinion based on the fact that he is a drag queen is why people took issue with how your posts were worded.

Do you always refer to people by their occupation or hobby? In both a post you quoted and responded to, and the title of this thread, you had two names by which to refer to this person; Rory or Panti. You chose "drag queen". You weren't "referring to him by this fact", you were reducing him down to it as if being a drag queen is his only identity. If you can't see how that displays a dismissive and condescending attitude, you're doomed to repeat the same mistakes.

Corkfeen

Brown Bomber wrote: »

This guy Rory is a drag queen so what is the problem with referring to this fact?

Replace "drag queen" with "Big Brother contestant" in everything I said and tell me if you still have a problem. Why/Why not?

If describing a public person by the reason they are public at all supposedly has undertones of homophobia I am glad this thing with Waters has happened to make people think twice about making false allegations again in public.

http://collegetribune.ie/index.php/2012/08/gay-marriage-is-a-product-of-this-bunker-mentality/

If those aren't the words of a homophobic person, I have entered some bizarre opposite world. Describing a conspiracy of gay people that don't wish to destroy the fabric of society are the words of a person with an irrational (homophobic) fear of gay people.

Cabaal wrote: »

:rolleyes:
Even more selfish to not think of women,

I know a women who met a man in the 1950's, it was great at first but then the day after they got married she said something to him in the car that he didn't like and her new husband punched her in the face,

She endured years of abuse at the hands of the man she married, she received no support from priests and none from society at the time either...because of the catholic instilled view of marriage.

Eventually she was able to leave him as times thankfully changed,

Marriage back then made for better or worse and it didn't matter if worse was having seven shades of ****e beaten out of you,

Its like the abortion debate when it comes to people like you bb, lets think of the children but to hell with the women (or man, lets not forget men can be abused in a relationship as well).

Its no good keeping a relationship together for the sake of the children if both partys in the relationship hate each other, you honestly think that hatred won't affect the children? Seriously whats wrong with you?

Ah, more personal abuse I see.

You've made a few giant leaps. I said it is selfish to not think of your children due the damage and you've leaped into a ridiculous strawman without even acknowledging that children can be innocent victims of consequence with divorce.

robindch

Brown Bomber wrote: »

This guy Rory is a drag queen so what is the problem with referring to this fact?

You know exactly what you're doing and -- as earlier today -- you're fooling nobody with your faux "Who, me?" act.

If you refer to Rory again as a drag queen, or anything other than his full name, you will be banned. Likewise for any more posts that are inflammatory or hostile in the opinion of any of the mods. Like your immediately previous post, for example.

This, lest you try a "Who, me?" with respect to this warning, comes at the end of a long, long series of public and private warnings about your use of objectionable and hostile language.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Ah, more personal abuse I see.

If you think its personal abuse then report it and stop your nonsense claiming it in posts...it looks seriously silly, your only looking for attention now.

MrPudding

Cabaal wrote: »

If you think its personal abuse then report it and stop your nonsense claiming it in posts...it looks seriously silly, your only looking for attention now.

I for one can't wait for his next dispute resolution thread. I love them.

MrP