Deleted User wrote: » Have to pretend he's not playing. (stubborn non-Suarez bet)
Mr.Prodston wrote: » I'm irrationally trying to figure out how a team with Mata in it works :pac: Yes I know it's not likely at all but having a contingency in mind isn't a bad thing to have if it does happen...or so I'm telling myself anyway.
G1032 wrote: » Option number 2 This one without Silva. Don't fancy Cazorla but he's the answer to my lack of Arsenal attacking cover until Ramsey is back Any thoughts??
Dont be at yourself wrote: » At 9.4 he's way too expensive...
Deleted User wrote: » not if he moves to Utd and plays at 80% of what he did last season there...
Dont be at yourself wrote: » Last year's Chelsea is a different proposition to this year's Man United; but let's run with it. Last year, he scored 212 points in 2729 minutes, which is roughly 1 point every 13 minutes, or 7 points every 90 minutes. In total, Mata played around 80% of available minutes in the league (otherwise, injured, rotated, rested for European games). Assuming similar usage by Moyes, we can expect him to play in around 1150 minutes between now and the end of the season. If he can reproduce last year's form, that would earn him around 88 points. If he does 80% of what he did, he'd earn around 70 points. After 22 games (our current gameweek), he'd be looking at around 96 points, which would put him in the same bracket Cabaye, Oscar or Gerrard, and below the heavy hitters Yaya, Hazard, Ozil and cheaper options like Ramsey and Lallana: Yaya Toure (136) Hazard (135) Ramsey (113) Lallana (104) Ozil (100) Cabaye (96) Oscar (95) Gerrard (94) A secondary consequence is that Chelsea midfielders like Oscar, Willian would see more game time, and the United forwards (whoever is fit at the time) may see a benefit (Mata had 18 assists versus 11 goals) last year. For me, if you wanted to gamble on the Mata move happening, I'd get in Willian (7.5, now regularly starting for Chelsea, and owned by only 0.4%) and a United striker (Rooney, if he's back fit -- as he'd likely be pushed further forward if Mata was in the hole).
POKERKING wrote: » I dont like delph at all there, id rather go with Noone, Gnabry or Alex Posuelo(who i will be going with personally)as my cheap 5th mid.
Munster Magic wrote: » Lallana, Cabaye or Eriksen???
Swiper the fox wrote: » I don't doubt your statistics there although it seems extraordinary that Mata's FPL production last year was on a par with Gerrard or Cabaye's this year, he seemed much better at the time, outside of Bale I felt that he was the closest thing to a sure thing(along with Walcott) in the midfield.
FHFC wrote: » This is where I am currently at..... Hope to have another 0.1 or 0.2 from rises. Any random thoughts? If Cabaye goes it will probably be Eriksen or Lallana. Gnabry could well become Noone. If Coleman is not crocked I can downsize Merts to Kos or Sagna and hopefully just about afford him, if I want to keep him, and I'll probably be scared not to. If the whole RVP thing doesn't fly I can drop him to any striker and get pretty much any to mid for Gnabry. It's a punt but I believe it might pay off and if it doesn't it's fixable.
G1032 wrote: » Who are people using for Arsenal attacking cover? Ozil, who I can afford, just isn't returning the points. Giroud is not a better option than Adebayor. Ramsey still isn't back. Wilshere is an option but that money is probably better spent on Lallana. Is Cazorla really worth 9.5m?
Dempsey wrote: » Taking an awful risk on RVP too, he wont be match sharp
Lemlin wrote: » I'm abandoning Arsenal attacking cover for now. Will wait and see how Ramsey plays when he comes back. The points have been too spread out at present.
FHFC wrote: » This is where I am currently at.....
Danger781 wrote: » Massive team value! :eek: Only way I can afford that front 3 is all of my defenders having a max value 4.5, with Hazard, Silva, Eriksen, and two 4.5 mids..
FHFC wrote: » At present 111.5 with resale 107.8. Want to make it work for me and do something different.
Who_8_Paul? wrote: » Think I've settled on my WC team except for the last two places, depends if Coleman is out for a while or not, it's down to Coleman and Sturridge Or Baines and Adebayor? Already have Suarez obviously but Sturridge should rake in the points in the 2nd half of the season as well if he stays fit, Baines is a bonus magnet though; Adebayor is hot/cold which is frustrating as an FF player. Going with puncheon as a cheap 5th midfielder for a few weeks, can't afford Januzaj, Ki is the only other cheapie that FF scout still have on their watchlist but not so sure about him, Puncheon has gotten the odd goal for me in the past at nice times too
Lemlin wrote: » What's your full team? I'd go Baines and Ade. Ade is a proven goal scorer. I don't really agree with your comment re "hot and cold". When he plays regularly, he scores. He's shown that over the past few games. I still don't get the hype about Januzaj. A good player no doubt but he's not returning points. People have called Adam Johnson a bandwagon but at least he is scoring. If Januzaj was at Norwich or Sunderland I don't think people would be bringing him in. It's the United effect.
Lemlin wrote: » I still don't get the hype about Januzaj. A good player no doubt but he's not returning points. People have called Adam Johnson a bandwagon but at least he is scoring. If Januzaj was at Norwich or Sunderland I don't think people would be bringing him in. It's the United effect.