Czarcasm wrote: » You could equally dismiss and ignore the consequences of divorce as you did with the consequences of visiting an escort in order to support or disagree with your simplistic argument.
catallus wrote: » The real deception that is going on is the one in which people tell themselves that life-long marriage to one person is a valid societal construct.
Candie wrote: » Careful, you could cause me a lot of hassle there
smellslikeshoes wrote: » I think you need to put yourself in the shoes of a man in a sexless or essentially sexless marriage before you criticize. You love your wife deeply but since you got married and had maybe 2-3 kids the sex has completely evaporated. What are you supposed to do, Trying to convince someone who doesn't think there is anything wrong to go to marriage counseling? If someone has made up their mind that they don't want sex anymore no amount of counseling is going to help. Divorce her? Or go see Candi the escort twice a month.
smellslikeshoes wrote: » Or go see Candi the escort twice a month.
Pumpkinseeds wrote: » Anyone else read the thread title as VIKING escort? No, just me?:o
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » I don't know how a completely sexless marriage could be a happy one
Legs.Eleven wrote: » Getting your rocks off with a prostitute does nothing but scratch an itch
Czarcasm wrote: » That's less saving their marriage and more just redefining their relationship. Then it's just a marriage by name and not by nature. I have no issue with people redefining what their marriage means to them, more power to them and all, but the suggestion by anyone that escorts save marriages is about as valid as those e-mails that say with some magic beans I can add inches to my mickey.
Tasden wrote: » But if working on their marriage involves a mutual agreement regarding the use of escorts then that can save the marriage. I think that every relationship is different and as long as both partners are genuinely OK with it then whatever works for them. Using them without your partner knowing- hell no.
Czarcasm wrote: » It happens an awful lot that people fool themselves into thinking their marriage was saved by merely having their sexual desires fulfilled by a third party. The only thing that saves a marriage is when the people involved in the marriage choose to work on their marriage. Otherwise they're best just call it a day and stop kidding themselves.
Chefrio wrote: » I was browsing the escort Ireland forum for sh1ts and giggles ..
dark crystal wrote: » Deceit can never work in a marriage.
howamidifferent wrote: » Would a volkswagon work just as well?
Chefrio wrote: » I was browsing the escort Ireland forum for sh1ts and giggles and noticed an interesting thread about your first time with an escort or a client. It was mentioned by a few that visiting escorts saved their marriage.Do you think this happens much and is the marriage really saved? I have mixed feelings on matter, think it probably could save some who are in sexless but otherwise happy marriages. But deception ain't cool.
Candie wrote: » Easier and cheaper doesn't always equal the best answer. As my neighbour with the newly repaired, but still leaky roof will tell you.