spiralism wrote: » I remember seeing their videos on Kerrang a number of times and they were in the magazine a ton, used to get it quite a bit...i feel dirty for ever having listened to them. Wasnt much of a fan but found a couple of early songs alright, i feel like i need to scrub my ears out with a wire brush now. This is pure ****ing evil, plain and simple.
I dont think he should be executed. Have him serve life without parole in general pop, much better treatment. Let him live in fear for the rest of his days and that may be the slightest shred of retribution next to what he did.
Vicxas wrote: » You dont think that someone who has made so much money and could do anything they wanted would do THIS. But then you look at Jimmy Saville and Gary Glitter, and you wonder IS it the fact that they can do anything, or is it a mental thing?
Sunglasses Ron wrote: » While it sounds like and probably is an urban legend, anyone that stupid shouldn't be allowed to take care of themselves unsupervised, let alone kids.
tritium wrote: » God I hate the "poor little innocent woman" defence. He made me do it m'lud, I was starstruck and too thick to know right from wrong. Just as guilty
I am pie wrote: » Ah no, just five innocent lads out to earn a living apparently, sure it's more important they make a few quid from this than the feelings of the victims. .
Neyite wrote: » This case was inches away from becoming another Baby P case. The mother in that instance was named, probably because Peter died. But throughout the trial and sentencing and even while imprisoned for a while, her identity was protected. She was denied a new identity on release from prison, and rightly so. So it might happen yet in this case, especially if the children are adopted into another family and have a new life for themselves. It would be a tragedy if those women had any further access to their victims. I do hope that they are officially named.
NTMK wrote: » My friends and I have all gone through the task or removing any LP song of our playlists completely tainted now. The other band members will probably never work in the industry again whether or not they had any knowledge of this.
Grayditch wrote: » If you're looking to nail him over something, might I suggest the whole baby rape thing?
Holsten wrote: » This is stupid as hell. They had no knowledge, why should they not work again? They didn't do anything. Any removing their music... why? Do you think it will hurt him or something? You feel it will make you feel better about the situation? I really don't get it.
clairefontaine wrote: » Someone had to know. They now have to say they didn't know or they are accomplices. Any money you give to them, will also go to him.
Warper wrote: » Just a PR trick coming up to Xmas, try and sell more records
Abigayle wrote: » Reading how he was 'shaking in the dock' while pale and shaken.. If I heard he was made a big boys bitch in prison I'd sleep soundly at night.
Dravokivich wrote: » The only people to be looked into other than Ian and the women with him, are the police who didn't act on previous reports over 2 years ago. They only went to this guys house for a drug inspection and stumbled into the whole child porn/rape thing.
I am pie wrote: » You would have to assume that the police investigation included the bandmates and they are in the clear. We'll never know what they knew or didn't know beyond they haven't been charged with committing a crime. His actions will taint them for the rest of their careers , rightly or wrongly. I wish there was a way to stop him earning anymore royalties. I would hate to see this pig released in 10 years sitting on a fortune.Very unfortunate that the mob has turned on the poor lad from Steps who has the same surname.
Dravokivich wrote: » It's just as unfortunate that a handful of people here think that the rest of the band should suffer somewhat too, when there is nothing to presented to justify it.
take everything wrote: » Aren't some of the people involved in the Baby P case out now? Hard to fathom really.
I am pie wrote: » Have you any concept of perspective? Honestly, it seems like it is an alien concept to you. To me it is more important that: 1. The victims of this terrible crime and their families are protected from further suffering, that we can be compassionate enough to remove this band's albums from general sale to that aim. OR 2. 5 lads who have already made a substantial sum of money continue to make more money from songs sung by one of the most evil and committed wretches the music business has ever seen. I'd rather live in a world where a victim is more important thanks, you go ahead championing the rights of those poor lads to make money off the work of a monster. Knock yourself out. Can they not start a new group, join other groups? Once the trial is over maybe we can start a feed the Lostprophet's 5 campaign or something. Honestly, are you joking?
Napper Hawkins wrote: » Gotta laugh at the former LP fans deleting the band from the playlists etc. They got into an awful band due to having awful taste in music and now that the singer has been outed as a nonce, suddenly the bands music can't be listened to anymore? Shows how fickle you were in the first place. I watched Ian Watkins and the Lost Prophets rise from zero with their self produced first album to become what they did, all the while looking at Ian becoming more and more of a typical, teenrock spa who sees himself as untouchable. The ever more silly succession of trendy emo haircuts and the increasingly poppy (in fairness, it's not like they were slayer to begin with) music and his general douchey, vain demeanor all served to make me hate him and his ****ty band of awful. Then this happened. It's poetic, almost.
JimBrady wrote: » Yeah because a one year old getting raped is almost poetic. What the **** is wrong with you
Dravokivich wrote: » NO, perspective is in regards to all those involved, not looking to push guilt onto those who weren't. Your perspective is skewed and misguided. Not mine. And that does not mean I'm inconsiderate to the victims. It means I'm not looking to blame those who had no input on the entire issue.