Bambi wrote: » a) they were in a band with a sex offender for how many years and had no inkling what he was like, yeah fair enough if you believe that, I don't b) the f**ker was arrested ages ago and rather than disband straight away they hedge their bets until just before it goes to trial. Miserable morally dubious f**kwits
Bambi wrote: » The remaining members can agree to have all their royalties donated to charities but they probably wont because they're an utterly **** excuse for a band who had a kiddie fiddler as a singer.
Bambi wrote: » Never said they were guilty of anything other than being gutless c**ts who should be treated with contempt.
Cool_CM wrote: » Ever hear of the concept of innocent until proven guilty?
Lollipops23 wrote: » He's pled guilty though.
Dravokivich wrote: » A) You'd be surprised about how much you don't know about those around you everyday. As a band, they'd be 1 entity to whoever they have various contracts (Gigs, Merchandising, Recording), all which come with obligations. They'd need to have seeked legal advice prior to announcing a split, to determine any penalties and what would be the best approach for them out of it. You are truly something piece of work, if you think 5 other people who weren't involved should suffer due to this.
Deleted User wrote: » Mod Bambi I find it very difficult to believe you aren't trolling so drop it or you will face a ban. Everyone, please refrain from feeding the troll.
Bambi wrote: » I'm not trolling so there you go
Dravokivich wrote: » Cool_CM was discussing about the rest of the band, not Ian.
danniemcq wrote: » The reference was to the band not breaking up until recently though.
QuoteBoy wrote: » Ian Brady, Ian Huntley and now Ian Watkins. What's with the name Ian ffs?
Bambi wrote: » Fascinating, maybe you should explain this one entity presumption further, after all you work in the entertainment industry and have a firm grip on legal practice in the industry Don't you?
nacho libre wrote: » Watkins sent a text to one of the women saying: "If you belong to me, so does your baby." In another exchange with a second woman, she messaged Watkins images of her child saying: "She needs to know mummy and daddy don't love her." hmm. I feel for his parents if they're still around. How can he ever look them in the face after saying things like that
Foxhound38 wrote: » Why weren't the "mothers" named and shamed here? They are as guilty as this sub-human filthbag is...
Foxhound38 wrote: » I bought my girlfriend to see this wretch perform in the Ambassador in Dublin about a decade ago when we were teenagers - odd feeling... All of this story made me extremely angry and disguisted but that part of it in particular just made me feel sad... That poor child... Why weren't the "mothers" named and shamed here? They are as guilty as this sub-human filthbag is...
My name is URL wrote: » http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/live-lostprophets-ian-watkins-trial-6341204 Flipping hell. Lots of people elsewhere saying he's obviously sick but that just sounds like plain old fcuking evil
Bambi wrote: » a) they were in a band with a sex offender for how many years and had no inkling what he was like, yeah fair enough if you believe that, I don't
SimonQuinlank wrote: » Wonder what all his moronic fans,who were claiming this ''was a conspiracy against a musical god'' think now?
P_1 wrote: » There's wrong and then there's just plain depravity. Unfortunately it seems to have happened a few other times with members of 'Nu-Metal' bands. The mothers who let their kids be raped too, fcuking hell
dark crystal wrote: » I presume to protect the anonymity of the victims.