gimmick wrote: » Need rid of Lambert, Ben Arfa and Moses, but only one can get the chop this week. The most obvious one is probably Lambert. I can afford Lukaku if I do that. Not sure what I would do if I dropped one of the other 2 yet, so they get a stay this week I think.
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Swiper talking about bringing RVP into his team? The hell happened over the weekend and hat have you done with the Swiper we know and love? :eek: I'm going to try and wait until thursday or friday before I really look at things again. The internationals will be done and dusted then too. It's amazing at just how quiet the place has been though since about Tuesday last week bar a few lads straying in for a while :pac:
frisbeeface wrote: » Really want to get Lukaku in my team but no idea which one of Sturridge, Giroud or Rooney to get rid of. They all have lovely fixtures. I was thinking Giroud as he has the worst form of the 3 but nervous getting him out before a home game against Norwich.
q2ice wrote: » For all those who like stats:Based on 2013/14 season so far...Team Clean Sheets Conceded Goals Scored None Scored Southampton 5 2 7 2 West Ham United 4 5 7 4 Tottenham Hotspur 4 5 6 2 Chelsea 3 4 10 2 Liverpool 3 5 11 1 Hull City 3 7 6 3 Manchester City 3 8 17 1 Everton 3 9 10 2 West Bromwich Albion 2 6 7 3 Stoke City 2 7 4 4 Aston Villa 2 8 9 2 Manchester United 2 9 10 2 Fulham 2 9 5 2 Norwich City 2 9 5 3 Swansea City 2 11 8 2 Newcastle United 2 12 9 2 Arsenal 1 8 14 0 Cardiff City 1 9 7 3 Crystal Palace 0 13 5 4 Sunderland 0 16 5 2Edit: Updated to make table sortable by clicking on header
Iused2likebusts wrote: » interesting stuff stoke and west ham failing to score in 4 out of 7 games. Stoke were much the same last year and despite west ham winning at spurs last time I'd see a lack of goals at both ends in their games going forward. 1 cs in 7 for arsenal is poor when you consider the fixtures they had however they have been far and away the most impressive attacking team to date.
bo-sco wrote: » The statistics would indicate that Man City have been more impressive attacking. Scored well over two goals a game, three more than Arsenal in all and probably have had harder fixtures.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » I was basing my opinion on their actual performances arsenal have looked like they have goals in them everytime Ive seen them. City seem to be great at home and poor away. The stats do tell another story and ye city have had marginally the harder games.
FutureGuy wrote: » Arsenal are far more likely to win 4-1 than they are 4-0. Regardless of whether they keep clean sheets in the next 2 or not, I'm shipping Kosielny out. I did Ward-Prowse to Januzaj and that's probably all I'll do right now.
Swiper the fox wrote: » I don't normally do long term planning as it never really works out for one reason or another. However my thinking defensively now is to leave Mertesacker in situ for the next two weeks- then I will replace him with a Chelsea defender(probably Terry) and double up on their defence(I have Luiz) for the following 7 weeks, that way even with rotation I'll be sure of having one of them play, I'm confident that there's goals in Luiz this year and we know Terry is always a threat.
Mr.Prodston wrote: » That's the thing with Arsenal alright. I need to make a defensive reshuffle with Kos and Hangeland out, I'm just not sure this is the week to do it. If Swansea's defenders happen to be fit come friday I may do Hangeland out anyway but Kos will not be far behind and I'm eyeing up Clyne next week for him.
Copper_pipe wrote: » Should I ship out one of Brady/Chester or both?
roryc wrote: » Chester -> Terry. Done.
L.A.D wrote: » A LOT of people will be on the Townsend bandwagon
IvySlayer wrote: » Ozil injured! Must come up with back up plan if it's bad