urabell wrote: » ... over a wetser with no personality...
Links234 wrote: » this might shock you to find out, but there's no real objective standard for attractiveness, and different people will find different people attractive
brummytom wrote: » Speaking as a less attractive person: No, I'm not attracted to fellow facially-unfortunate people.
miss no stars wrote: » Put Cara Delevingne next to someone who's short, fat, has bad skin, a big forehead & chin, crooked nose, pokey eyes and a measly mouth and tell me there's no such thing as an objective standard for attractiveness.
Neeson wrote: » That CD one looks very manly. Too much so for my liking.
mutley18 wrote: » She looks like my brother.
miss no stars wrote: » Put Cara Delevingne next to someone who's short, fat, has bad skin, a big forehead & chin, crooked nose, pokey eyes and a measly mouth and tell me there's no such thing as an objective standard for attractiveness. Sure, people will have differences in who they're attracted to visually, but overall some people ARE more attractive than others. If no such difference really existed, people like Cara wouldn't be rolling in it.
Links234 wrote: » had to look up who that was, http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Cara+Delevingne+Samsung+Galaxy+Features+Arrivals+Rpt56pZPWA6l.jpg see to me, she's not particularly attractive. it's the ultra skinny model thing, not a draw for me at all
urabell wrote: » So you're not really attracted which is fine, have you ever found yourself playing tonsil hockey with a girl of her type in a nightclub? I just don't understand why people hook up with someone they're not physically attracted to.
Deleted User wrote: » We take all comers.
Alter-Ego wrote: » She looks a bit like a junkie that spat at me a few years ago on abbey street.
Muise... wrote: » and goers, eh? Know what I mean, know what I mean?
urabell wrote: » there's not a hope in hell some fat bird would be allowed to be torn apart like this
jaffusmax wrote: » You don`t look at the mantelpiece when you`re poking the fire!
Links234 wrote: » :rolleyes:
miss no stars wrote: » If your brother looks like this he could make a lot of money:
Using computer graphic techniques, opposite sex facial stimuli were generated from subjects’ photographs. Experiment 1 showed a correlation between attractiveness and similarity but the effect can be explained by the attractiveness of average faces. Beyond this, there was a trend for individual subjects to rate opposite sex images with a similar face shape to their own face as more attractive than other subjects. Experiment 2 allowed subjects to interactively manipulate an opposite sex facial image along a continuum from a self-similar shape, through an average face shape, to a face with opposite characteristics. No significant preferences for self-similar or opposite characteristics were found. Preferences for average faces are stronger than preferences for self-similar faces.
bnt wrote: » You do know that sociologists do research on this kind of stuff, right? Example: Computer Graphic Studies of the Role of Facial Similarity in Judgements of Attractiveness From the Abstract: (emphasis added)
Preferences for average faces are stronger than preferences for self-similar faces.
urabell wrote: » Thank you for the honesty, that being said actual ugly people are as rare as hen's teeth, a few aesthetic improvements and an attitude change will sort most people out. We're all gonna make it it the end friend