Grayditch wrote: » And what happens after that?
Mr Alan wrote: » It's important to keep re-iterating this IMO. Otherwise the goalposts will be moved in an effort to heap praise on management/FSG.
Francie Barrett wrote: » I'm calling it now. Jordan Rossiter will be the best central midfielder that the academy has produced since Gerrard. It's frightening just how good this kid is and he's only 16.
“Jordan Rossiter has trained with us a few times. I like the look of him. He’s got a bit of character and steel that me and Stevie have had – When he was 15 he was playing for the U18s, which is a tremendous accolade for the lad. He’s a great talent,” Carragher told the Liverpool website.
Mr Alan wrote: » Then we finish 6th/7th without ever really challenging for the CL.
mike65 wrote: » Liverpool lead 3-2. But Utd have the upper hand, Liverpool are running on fumes
Mr Alan wrote: » He's talking about Cissokho recapturing that form. Kinda like when we bought Joe Cole & hoped he'd recapture his previous form.
mike65 wrote: » Jordon Ibe Jordan Lussey Jordan Rossitter Jordan Henderson
spockety wrote: » I like ya Alan but sweet jesus I get tired just reading your posts these last few months. ;-)
5live wrote: » Wow. You are starting to sound paranoid. I cannot recall one poster on this or the last thread that wasnt of the opinion that 2 to 3 starters were required to improve the first team. Perhaps you can point me in the direction of such a post? To a man here, we will criticise or praise FSG/the management when WE decide it is needed and NOT when you decide. We are capable of making up our own minds on the evidence we see from day to day and not for fear of being denigrated by you . If our opininions dont suit you then tough titty. Deal with it and move on.
seanwhite20 wrote: » Guess he won't be going to FC Vatican so!
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » Ironically, Alan and co are being harangued out of here for having their own opinion. It is the nature in which their posts are being dismissed that has Alan posting in this nature. Consider what Alan and Lloyd have been saying regarding the current owners ambitions and willingness to invest in players and also the managers ability to turn things around. Do you see now why Alan is asking the questions that he is asking? If the players that are needed are not signed, what does it mean? Is then ok to question the owners or the the manager? The excuse of "the right players weren't available" excuse will can't wash this time around.
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » Ironically, Alan and co are being harangued out of here for having their own opinion.
whatawaster wrote: » Seriously, would you quit this? They are not
Chucky the tree wrote: »
T-K-O wrote: » By the same token, guys are entitled to wait until the window closes before lambasting the club.
Turtyturd wrote: » Does Fabio's performance buy him a bit of time with his detractors, especially when you consider Shelvey looked like um....a footballer at that level.
G.K. wrote: » When people ignore the context of stats, which I believe to be an incredibly powerful tool, or use stats badly, I rage. The sample size of games without Suarez must be tiny. He'll have played in just about every game he was available for selection. I imagine the games he didn't feature in included the easy EL games last year, and the dead rubbers at the end of last season. In the tough games which ye lost, he was typically playing. But there haven't been a lot of those style of games where he didn't play. That alone utterly devalues the statement which is supposedly 'backed up by the stats.' The sample sizes would have to be equal for that stat to even remotely have use. I remember a similar one about Modric a few seasons back.
