jesus_thats_gre wrote: » Hmmm far too many parallels to be drawn there to be frank. Feel for the poor bollox to be honest. He is the product of placating and misleading fans.
MD1990 wrote: » strongly agree every signing Spurs make alot of fans on here autmatocally think there great Spurs lack creativity & are poor at the back & Bale will be a massive loss
Paulegend wrote: » yes i think rodgers has been great. he has us playing football. will he be a success i dont know but he has done much better with both the media and the fans compared to managers before him. when he was at swansea they where praised for playing the "barca football" and where said to be playing better football than arsenal. now we are playing better football than the "pretty football" arsenal.as io said i dont know if he will win anything with us but so far he has been great
djPSB wrote: » If we keep Suarez and sign Willian, I don't think fans can have can have many complaints about this summers' business.
Vicxas wrote: » Sounds like pool fans during the H&G era
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » 30 plus million, yes, without doubt. 15m or so, not overly. In the context of more players leaving than being signed or the wage bill continuing to be reduced, no. When we are spending 40/50/60m net, then it will be completely put to bed.
djPSB wrote: » Lads calm the fook down and watch this. Should ease the stress levels.
rarnes1 wrote: » It's a bit early to be lavishing words like great on our manager ffs. To become a great manager you need to be winning major honours, not fannying around in 7th spot.
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » No, I would agree with you. No real justifiable reason to complain. No major reason to be jumping up an down with joy though. With the numbers that have left the club, with the wage bill being reduced and us being neutral on net spend, a Willian type signing is pretty much an expectation.
Mr Alan wrote: » The usual suspects will pull this up as absolute tripe. Most will ignore it as its positive delusion. That's the biggest issue with this thread IMO. A post like the above should be scoffed at by all.
Grayditch wrote: » Feel bad for Arsenal fans in some ways, I think they're good supporters going through a rough time. But I feel worse for us and I'd take their CL spot off them if I could. I wouldn't wish that crushing feeling of an opening day battering on any supporters. Well... One or two groups
djPSB wrote: » I thought it was bad form on the fans behalf yesterday when they booed Cazorla after the game. Would expect better.
rarnes1 wrote: » I doubt many will be happy with just that tbh, infact I'd say most will be fairly annoyed if that was the case. A top CB is a must even before a wing forward imo. Shouldn't have to rely on Toure at his age. A CM is also a must if we want to compete for top 4/honours. Are Henderson/Allen good enough for 1st team action? Decent squad players that's all. Wouldn't get a sniff in Spurs/Arsenal/Chelsea + both Manchester midfields. A decent sub keeper should also be signed
Paulegend wrote: » just saying hwat he has been doing has been great he got overpayed fringe players out of the club. he sold andy carroll and actually got 18 fricken million for him ffs. he brought in players like sturridge and coutinho. the players look happy and he has to be praised for his part in the suarez affair. so as a manager he has been great. he hasnt won anything yet and may not but he has been a great manager for us in his time here. dimatteo won the champions league but i wouldnt call him a great manager by any imagination.
the players look happy
he brought in players like sturridge and coutinho
he has to be praised for his part in the suarez affair
Pedalstool wrote: » He's only 32, good grief I'm only 32 myself, practically a teenager!
Raif Severance wrote: » Our Fans wants us to Overpay for Players? You would have thought after the Crapton we've spent acquiring Duds like Carroll, Downing, etc. that they would be more appreciative of the Club, being more Smart about our Money. I guess not!
whatawaster wrote: » Some posters are just better ignored
rarnes1 wrote: » and yet you still quoted Alan