whatawaster wrote: » Harsh on Sterling
murpho999 wrote: » Well I think that this is a game that we could easily have drawn last year and we held on for the win, and that is progress. Albeit with a bit of luck with the peno save. Regarding Agger, I have said on this thread before that he is over rated and prone to errors.
murpho999 wrote: » All in all, I'm happy with how we played, thought we played with good style and purpose and they showed a great attitude. Pressure was on to start season with a victory and they have delivered.
murpho999 wrote: » All this micro - analysis here serves no purpose. I expect them to improve as season goes on.
Grayditch wrote: » Sterling looks very incomplete.
Mr Alan wrote: » Thought he was awful. Added nothing at all when he came on. I'm worried that his development was stunted last season.
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » We could have easily drawn the match today. They hit the crossbar and had a penalty saved in the last 2/3 minutes of the match. On Agger, I probably would have disagreed with you over the past year but really am starting to come around. I love the man though so I find it difficult to be impartial on him. Agree completely. How does an attention to detail not serve any purpose? That is what the difference between actually knowing what is going on versus wilful ignorance. Glossing over glaring issues is not the recipe for success!
Pedalstool wrote: » Seems to be a lot of dislike building up towards Sterling from folks in here. He's going to be a fantastic player. End of.
jesus_thats_gre wrote: » We could have easily drawn the match today. They hit the crossbar and had a penalty saved in the last 2/3 minutes of the match.
On Agger, I probably would have disagreed with you over the past year but really am starting to come around. I love the man though so I find it difficult to be impartial on him.
Agree completely.
How does an attention to detail not serve any purpose? That is what the difference between actually knowing what is going on versus wilful ignorance. Glossing over glaring issues is not the recipe for success!
Yawns wrote: » Not a lot of dislike building up from what I can see. He just simply had a bad game today and people are saying it. He was excellent first half of last season then lost form. Seems to have had a good pre-season but a disappointing first appearance in the league. I'm not going to start slating the lad or think he'll amount to nothing. I think we're all allowed to criticize a player after a poor performance and this is all that this is.
Pedalstool wrote: » He didn't have a bad game. He gave away one free kick. Aside from that he did fine in the 15 minutes he was on the pitch.
rarnes1 wrote: » Sterling was badly managed last year but after not playing the 2nd half of the season and a pre season behind him that shouldn't have stunted him. Imo however, he's not good enough yet to play for us bar an odd cameo. I was hoping he'd be loaned out tbh this season.
rarnes1 wrote: » I'm gonna inject a bit of positvity in here for a minute........ It took us 6 games to break 3 points last season
murpho999 wrote: » Remember last season lads we didn't get our first win until September 29th! So we're ahead on that score.
Pedalstool wrote: » In other good news Arsenal look a shambles.
Tusky wrote: » Wow. Everyone is being incredibly harsh on Sterling and it's unfair. He was not awful.