nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

GavRedKing

Old thread here : http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056303530

Play nice everyone.

Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card.

Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

TheBuilder

Great goal from Black

CSF

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

So the games that bring in the most people can't be included in the totals. Fair enough.

Attendance today was only 6k compared to Rangers' 35k. So embarrassing!!

Google average attendance figures and see which ones you find.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

2-0 Little nice build up play

BhoscaCapall

CSF wrote: »

Google average attendance figures and see which ones you find.

Aha I see the source of you confusion now. When I said "total" I meant total, rather than average. Other words would be 'sum' or 'aggregate'.

CSF

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

Aha I see the source of you confusion now. When I said "total" I meant total, rather than average. Other words would be 'sum' or 'aggregate'.

Who ever refers to total attendances? Jesus you are obtuse.

TheBuilder

3-0 Shiels

Broxi_Bear_Eire

3-0 Sheils another good build up

BhoscaCapall

CSF wrote: »

Who ever refers to total attendances? Jesus you are obtuse.

It's ok mate we all make basic reading mistakes sometimes.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

4-0 Little gets his second

CSF

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

It's ok mate we all make basic reading mistakes sometimes.

Cringe.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

CSF wrote: »

Cringe.

Think yourself lucky we have to put up with that all the time

PauloMN

Last time I dropped by here, all the talk was about the number of people in the stadium. Same today, what's going on? Are people really that into attendance figures? And are people seriously trying to compare the attendance figures of the two clubs when their respective situations are polar opposites? It's possibly the single-most stupid discussion I've ever read on either thread, and there's been some pretty stupid discussions on both threads over the past few years.

You lot will be comparing the length of yer lads next ffs.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

PauloMN wrote: »

Last time I dropped by here, all the talk was about the number of people in the stadium. Same today, what's going on? Are people really that into attendance figures? And are people seriously trying to compare the attendance figures of the two clubs when their respective situations are polar opposites? It's possibly the single-most stupid discussion I've ever read on either thread, and there's been some pretty stupid discussions on both threads over the past few years.

You lot will be comparing the length of yer lads next ffs.

The only time I posted was to point some things out to a certain person other than that it was to say I don't care what people say about figures I am however very interested in how ours is next season. Other than that I posted updates on the match

PauloMN

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

The only time I posted was to point some things out to a certain person other than that it was to say I don't care what people say about figures I am however very interested in how ours is next season. Other than that I posted updates on the match

Not singling anyone out mate, I know you were posting on the match, but there's pages of pointless crap in this thread about attendances.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

PauloMN wrote: »

Not singling anyone out mate, I know you were posting on the match, but there's pages of pointless crap in this thread about attendances.

Yes there is but there is pages of pointless crap about a lot of things in this thread. Surely you must have wondered why we don't post as much in here. Its a pity but some people never get tired putting the boot in for any excuse so instead of banter you get ill feeling its just not worth the bother. I can go to my local and enjoy the banter with all the tic fans so coming in to this thread is becoming less and less of an interest. Same goes for the Celtic thread I am sorry to say

BhoscaCapall

So if Charles Green releases press conference 238473 mentioning Celtic, and we have a laugh at his crackpot fabricated statistics once again - is that putting the boot in or is it banter?

Just so we know where the line is.

Coillte_Bhoy

Madam wrote: »

It never ceases to amaze me what you guys get all het up about:rolleyes:

'You guys'? i presume you mean celtic and rangers fans, well most of us arent getting het up about it but CSF and a celtic fan do seem to be and they are in a minority

Madam

Coillte_Bhoy wrote: »

'You guys'? i presume you mean celtic and rangers fans, well most of us arent getting het up about it but CSF and a celtic fan do seem to be and they are in a minority

Lol OK I believe you;)

BhoscaCapall

These Jim Traynor/Craig Whyte texts & emails are hilarious http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/succulent-lamb-rack/4144

Shame they are published by proven bigot Alex Timmy Thomson and therefore wholly discredited.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

These Jim Traynor/Craig Whyte texts & emails are hilarious http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/succulent-lamb-rack/4144

Shame they are published by proven bigot Alex Timmy Thomson and therefore wholly discredited.

No but it will be interesting to see where he got them from or were they illegally obtained.
Also what do they prove other than a journalist was sucking up to someone to get information.
Pretty pathetic in all honesty but no doubt all sorts of accusations will now be stated

BhoscaCapall

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

No but it will be interesting to see where he got them from or were they illegally obtained.
Also what do they prove other than a journalist was sucking up to someone to get information.
Pretty pathetic in all honesty but no doubt all sorts of accusations will now be stated

I'm not reading into it or anything, I just think it's funny. Especially when there were years and years of people denying that Rangers had so much of the main stream Scottish media eating from their palms. It was their own downfall in the end so I'm not complaining.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

BhoscaCapall wrote: »

I'm not reading into it or anything, I just think it's funny. Especially when there were years and years of people denying that Rangers had so much of the main stream Scottish media eating from their palms. It was their own downfall in the end so I'm not complaining.

As long as your happy then

Its the simple things

Jelle1880

http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/opinion/item/3359-thomson-should-blog-off

BhoscaCapall

Got the "obsessed" defence in there in the first line hahaha

Jelle1880

And guess who goes out of his way to prove it.

For a war journalist Thomson doesn't half spend some time talking about Rangers.
He blogs about Rangers on pretty much a daily basis, I think 'obsessed' isn't that far of.

BhoscaCapall

Is it actually possible for anyone to criticise Rangers in any way and not be either a) obsessed with them or b) a bigot or c) both?

Jelle1880

Nobody called him a bigot apart from you, coincidentally.

And how else would you describe someone who seems to spend his every waking hour writing his little blog pieces about 1 single subject ?

BhoscaCapall

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Nobody called him a bigot apart from you, coincidentally.

And how else would you describe someone who seems to spend his every waking hour writing his little blog pieces about 1 single subject ?

That's lying James Traynor would be proud of. I've seen numerous articles from him on stuff like Syria, Belfast riots, and Israel over the past few months. I guess he's obsessed with all these things too.

Classic deflection from you as usual. Ignore what is being said and just loudly call everyone obsessed, as if it makes a difference. Surely someone spending so much time studying your club would be quite an informed source of information?

Jelle1880

And it's a fact that Thomson spends far more time blogging about Rangers these days than his so-called 'war corresponding'.

'Ignore what is being said' ?

Did you miss the link I posted, where Traynor completely demolishes Thomson's blog ?

But I guess that's classic you then, the same soundbites all the time.
And all the time the sheer irony of your usage of the word 'obsessed' escapes you.

Once again, classic you.
Maybe you can come up with another 'sarcastic post' which seems to have become a bit of a favourite of yourself.

It might stop people from seeing through the nonsense you post (or so you'd believe).

edit: I do find it funny though that you all of a sudden choose to believe Whyte.
After all, that is Thomson's source.

So if he claims that this is the 'negative story' that would break about Rangers then colour me unimpressed.

Pompey Magnus

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Did you miss the link I posted, where Traynor completely demolishes Thomson's blog ?

Just to be clear, do you actually believe Traynor's claim that he was instrumental in bringing down Whyte and that he was basically acting like a double agent where all his suck-up articles were simply intended to lull Whyte into a false sense of security?