Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » I'm not reading into it or anything, I just think it's funny. Especially when there were years and years of people denying that Rangers had so much of the main stream Scottish media eating from their palms. It was their own downfall in the end so I'm not complaining.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » No but it will be interesting to see where he got them from or were they illegally obtained. Also what do they prove other than a journalist was sucking up to someone to get information. Pretty pathetic in all honesty but no doubt all sorts of accusations will now be stated
BhoscaCapall wrote: » These Jim Traynor/Craig Whyte texts & emails are hilarious http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/succulent-lamb-rack/4144 Shame they are published by proven bigot Alex Timmy Thomson and therefore wholly discredited.
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » 'You guys'? i presume you mean celtic and rangers fans, well most of us arent getting het up about it but CSF and a celtic fan do seem to be and they are in a minority
Madam wrote: » It never ceases to amaze me what you guys get all het up about:rolleyes:
PauloMN wrote: » Not singling anyone out mate, I know you were posting on the match, but there's pages of pointless crap in this thread about attendances.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » The only time I posted was to point some things out to a certain person other than that it was to say I don't care what people say about figures I am however very interested in how ours is next season. Other than that I posted updates on the match
PauloMN wrote: » Last time I dropped by here, all the talk was about the number of people in the stadium. Same today, what's going on? Are people really that into attendance figures? And are people seriously trying to compare the attendance figures of the two clubs when their respective situations are polar opposites? It's possibly the single-most stupid discussion I've ever read on either thread, and there's been some pretty stupid discussions on both threads over the past few years. You lot will be comparing the length of yer lads next ffs.
CSF wrote: » Cringe.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » It's ok mate we all make basic reading mistakes sometimes.
CSF wrote: » Who ever refers to total attendances? Jesus you are obtuse.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Aha I see the source of you confusion now. When I said "total" I meant total, rather than average. Other words would be 'sum' or 'aggregate'.
CSF wrote: » Google average attendance figures and see which ones you find.
BhoscaCapall wrote: » So the games that bring in the most people can't be included in the totals. Fair enough. Attendance today was only 6k compared to Rangers' 35k. So embarrassing!!
CSF wrote: » When has ticket prices ever been factored into the average attendance table?
CSF wrote: » Champions League games are never included!!!!
BhoscaCapall wrote: » Oh, like excluding CL games? Fact is, with all cherry picking and fact twisting removed, Celtic have had more in the gate in both numbers and £s. I stress the word fact.
CSF wrote: » No, it factors in when it suits Celtic for it to factor in.
dooferoaks wrote: » Probably of little/no interest to most but Corby's Rangers Club has closed its doors, unlikely to re-open. One of the biggest clubs outside Scotland, apparently took 600 to the UEFA cup final in 2008. Huge Scottish population in Corby and both the old firm have a big following down there. Story HERE Went past it a few times, and its a decent sized place, Corby was supposedly one of the places in the UK to buck the trend with the recession but seemingly not in the pub sector.
