dd972 wrote: » just guessing that it may have been junkie types fighting among themselves as the most likely scenario, apparently there was some altercation prior to the incident, certainly hope it wasn't a tourist
Laneyh wrote: » I guess it's possible and just symptomatic of modern times it is a bit sad that upon witnessing something like that they reach for their phone not to call for assistance but to take a photo. I can see how it would happen in some situations but I think people should still be able to regulate themselves a bit or will we have hospital staff tweeting from A&E before too long ?
Taco Chips wrote: » The traffic coming down Dame St at that junction is definitely not slow. It's a sharp turn that many cars and buses seem to always take at speed. Standing at the pedestrian crossing on the footpath, buses often come with inches of making contact.
Carroller16 wrote: » Ye this caused chaos in town traffic wise.I would have been at the scene at about the time it happened if I wasn't delayed leaving work.
rainbowdrop wrote: » It's already happening! I actually blocked a guy I went to school with from my facebook over this. He is a doctor in an A+E department over in the UK, and was constantly putting up status updates about patients he was treating. Things like 'Oh God, Friday night shift, all night dealing with drunken fights and stupid girls who have sprained their ankles cos they are too drunk to walk in heels' or 'stupid bitch of an old woman whining at me because of waiting times. Not my fault ffs' Now, fair enough he is human and is entitled to an opinion, but it's HIGHLY unprofessional of him to be posting on social media about it. He's supposed to be a doctor! Back on topic, I don't usually post in these 'RIP' threads, but that guy this evening must have died a horrible death and the media were all over it before his family were probably even informed. Vultures! And the nit-picking/point scoring/thanks whoring going on in this thread is a disgrace.The poor guys body is barely cold ffs RIP
Madam_X wrote: » I was on Dame Street once opposite the Central Bank when this idiot who was walking backwards (it's unbelievable how some people are self absorbed enough to do that in a busy area) knocked me onto the street into the path of a bus that was absolutely bombing it. I got out of the way thankfully but was stunned at the speed of the bus.
Hippies! wrote: » The people that take photos of such tragedies have absolutely no respect whatsoever, disgusting scummers as far as I'm concerned with the sole intention of showing it to their mates for a laugh and a shock most likely :mad:
Monty Burnz wrote: » That's within the 30kph zone too. I wonder do the buses adhere to it?
WindSock wrote: » People taking pictures at the scene apparently. Ffs, what are they going to do...put them on Facebook and Twitter.
Run_to_da_hills wrote: » Only this Monday one of Rupert Murdoch’s sensationalist rags flaunted a shocking front page picture with the headline "Pushed on the subway tracks this man is about to die.... DOOMED".NY Post report.
Pottler wrote: » What happened?? Was he ok?? Did Rupert himself decide to publish it??? Will the world end soon?????? Do you have a big axe to grind????????:D
pithater1 wrote: » I highly doubt it. Used to cycle down Dame Street daily and the buses wizz right past you
Conchir wrote: » I think it might have something to do with the Bystander Effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect Basically, it's the theory that a passerby is unlikely to offer help in an emergency if there are other passersby present. So, most people there would have just froze, until this one person thought to cover up the body. This theory I think is more to do with intervening in an assault or something, but I think the same principle might apply here - no one reacted because there were others around.
Hippies! wrote: » I know, I remember an incident in London a few years back where a guy was under a bus dying with people around him taken pictures instead of phoning for an ambulance. :mad: It's one thing I really hate about technology.
Deleted User wrote: » I personally don't think the bystander effect applies. They're still chossing to interact with what happened on some level rather than leaving it as "other".
Conchir wrote: » That's a good point. If they hadn't taken photos at all, maybe it would apply. However, I think something along those lines would explain why it took as long as it did for a person to react and cover up the body. Not strictly the bystander effect, but the same thinking behind it - someone else will do it.
Monty Burnz wrote: » They bystander effect has already been mentioned - I guess when there's a crowd around, everybody always assumes that someone else will call the police, will do something. And probably the fear of doing the wrong thing is magnified if you are doing it in front of a crowd. Far easier to stand amidst the crowd at a safe distance and hope someone else takes control.
brummytom wrote: » Jesus. RIP. Now how long before the usual brigade call for the death penalty? They may have wanted to seriously hurt him, but shoving someone and them ending up in that sort of state can't be want they intended.