Ellsbells wrote: » I know I would hate and worry if I saw my other half flirting with someone. I think there is always an intent behind flirting as its possible to turn it on or off. Would you think it's acceptable?Mod Edit: Please see here for mod note.
Moonbaby wrote: » For me in order for it to be called flirting, there has to be an intent there. Chatting, jokey banter etc don't come under my definition..
chatterpillar wrote: » 'chatting her up'
Sorcha16 wrote: » I don't think there's room for ambiguity though. The Oxford dictionary tells us that flirting is to "behave as though sexually attracted to someone, but playfully rather than with serious intentions" In fact, since when has it ever been anything else?
Sorcha16 wrote: » What's interesting is that you'll dismiss the parts you don't like and handpick the ones you do.
Deleted User wrote: » There can still be many levels of it, regardless of what the dictionary says. And it's interesting that it states "witout serious intent".
Deleted User wrote: » Like I said, people appear to have different views on what flirting actually is.
Sorcha16 wrote: » That's not being flirty, it's being outgoing and sociable
Deleted User wrote: » I have a very flirty personality, it's not something I turn on or off, it's how I am, with everyone, women and men alike. I smile a lot, I am very chatty, I am very tactile.
g'em wrote: » Sorcha perhaps you've had some experiences in the past that have led you to hold such extreme opinions, perhaps not. I don't agree, I think both men and women can flirt without knowing they are. Having said that I don't think all flirting is innocent, but - naive as I may be - I'm quite happy for my fiancé to have a little flirt when he goes out. Maybe I'm a fool, but I trust him
g'em wrote: » I'll explain where I'm coming from: I detest the phrase "other half", I mean absolute hate it.
Ellsbells wrote: » Gem I am entitled to have a view without you calling it rubbish and on top of that I do have a healthy (and happy) relationship. Because I am happy with my fella I don't need to get attention from other guys. I get enough at home.
Sorcha16 wrote: » You've interpreted it wrongly, yes. My point was made against the poster's assertion that she knew with absolute, unwavering certainty what her boyfriend's motives were, without question. "I know him soooo well and I know he would never do x,y,z"
chatterpillar wrote: » I can't state with 100% certainty that he won't ever cheat on me - however it would be extremely out of character for him.
username123 wrote: » Unless I am completely missing what you meant by the immortal words comment?
Sorcha16 wrote: » You're missing the point of your own principle -I'm not implying that if you flirt you're likely to cheat but that if you have cheated, you're likely to have flirted.
username123 wrote: » You could just as easily argue that any man who has been sexually or romantically involved with a woman has worn aftershave for her at some point, whether or not his wife is aware of it - does that mean we should all presume aftershave wearing men are cheaters?
Sorcha16 wrote: » I'm pretty sure any man who has been sexually or romantically involved with a woman has been flirtatious with her at some point, whether his wife is aware of it or not
Sorcha16 wrote: » The immortal words spoken by aeons of woman whose husbands have been cheating on them. I'm not suggesting for a moment that your boyfriend has or ever will cheat on you but claiming 100% certainty in absolute terms about someone else's motives is just naive and smacks a little of immaturity.
Sorcha16 wrote: » I also disagree with your excusing your boyfriend as an 'awful flirt' because 'it's just part of who he is'. Flirting is a conscious decision made between two adults, not an involuntary bodily reflex they are both incapable of stopping.
username123 wrote: » Bit of a generalisation, Im sure just as many women whose husbands werent flirtatious have been cheated on!
Sorcha16 wrote: » The immortal words spoken by aeons of woman whose husbands have been cheating on them.