Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card. Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » We also have a handful of youngsters in that squad with very little experience and as I said Ally can't motivate in fact I believe he may be losing the dressing room as some of his team selections are strange Oh and money doesn't make you a better player
RoryMac wrote: » Signing top SPL players does though, players you wanted to sign while in the SPL in the case of Sandaza & Black. Either way hard luck tonight I had hoped we'd meet you at some point in the competition so it's a pity that's not going to happen.
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » Remember we are a div 3 side or is that only when it suits you. I also believe its time for Ally to go. Not because of tonight it has been obvious for a while he can't motivate
bobmalooka wrote: » Super caley go ballis....only messing. Is super Ally goosed at this stage or will Green stick with him? Personally I think he'll say all is good because he wont want to upset the Shares issue and thats Greens ticket to making big bucks.
lubo_moravcik wrote: » He's not really indecisive about super Ally though, didn't he say both of them would he there to lead the team/club into the CL?
Dempsey wrote: » charles green will say whatever gets the best reaction from the fans or what keeps the majority onside. sacking a manager you declared that you wanted to give a 25 year contract will cause a period of instability and investor confidence goes through the floor. i think his ipo will be lucky to generate 10m either way tbh
Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: » He may have said that but no one is niaive enough surely to believe if results are not going right Green won't make changes. Not even you can think that Lubo
bobmalooka wrote: » Super caley go ballis....only messing.
lubo_moravcik wrote: » Des, if I posted that pic would I get an infraction for trolling?
Des wrote: » Hardly trolling to post a funny back page, is it? :rolleyes:
Eli Manning wrote: » As an investor I don't really think that the performances will mean a whole lot if you're really thinking of the display of the team atm. You'd have to think that in under 5 years Rangers will be challenging for titles in the SPL again and that's without the potential fast tracking of forming a bigger SPL. I don't think there is any doubt that they will win Division 3 this year IMO. Also Charles Green is only going to hang around as long as it's worth his while and obviously he considers that in the short term this is the best path for Rangers to take. A lot of investors are already being expected to be repaid for backing Charles Green and I think that's where the problem for Rangers will lie in the future. However, I don't think either sacking or keeping McCoist is going to make a big difference to the IPO. Rangers is a club than is nearly guaranteed to be in the SPL in the next 3-4 years and maybe earlier. They are investing in the future and what is considered to be an almost guaranteed return. My only problem would be that I don't trust Charles Green but I trust him as long as he's there.
Des wrote: » you better report me then.
Des wrote: » lubo, are you under the impression that I mod this forum, or had something to do with your previous banning?
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » lol at Commentator saying it was not penalty. Bless..
Pompey Magnus wrote: » ICT should have been down to 10 though....very poor call from the ref.
lubo_moravcik wrote: » What's going on here then? "Charles Green is the subject a new tax inquiry- separate from the Zeus investigation!!"
