wilfitz wrote: » Some are saying on here that to be the best you have to be in good physical condition. The best players win majors?? So I'm hoping that Shane Lowry wins a major and becomes one of the best no matter what his appearance or size be. Hope this helps with your confusion
FixdePitchmark wrote: » "Who is playing in the Heino at the weekend". :rolleyes:
slave1 wrote: » He got it, superb birdie, looks like a top 5 hopefully
bigtimecharlie wrote: » Shouldn't need qschool after this result.
Trampas wrote: » pga tour school
SSK wrote: » He isn't going to Q School after winning in Portugal got him into the HSBC next week.
Trampas wrote: » what has winning in portugal got to do getting us pga tour card. portugal only counts for europe
GreeBo wrote: » Not really, because the argument here is that he could be a better player if he lost some weight. No one has said that he isnt a good golfer, just that he is not being all that he can be. Winning a major doesn't prove that he wouldn't be all the better (and possibly win more) for losing weight. Some of the sports names given here help to show the difference between those who are willing to go the extra mile and those who aren't. IMO Not losing weight when you are clearly overweight shows a lack of drive to be the best you can be.
SSK wrote: » He prioritised breaking into the Top 50 over potentially playing for a card in the States. Best way to do that is by playing in the big tournaments over the next few weeks, starting with the HSBC next week. Edit - He should leap-frog Padraig in the rankings after this result, first time in forever that Paddy hasn't been the highest ranked ROI golfer.
wilfitz wrote: » No I'm afraid I don't agree with being clearly over weight shows a lack of drive. Obviously Shane's weight at the moment is not effecting his stamina towards the end of a long season with his recent performances. Everyone is entitled to there own opinion so I'm not going to go on about this anymore. I'm just happy to see Shane performing at the highest level.
GreeBo wrote: » Again I disagree, how can you say that he wouldnt have performed better if he was fitter and carrying less weight? Maybe he would have won today and won by more last time? I'd be pretty sure that, if asked, his preference would not be to be overweight.
wilfitz wrote: » Ok your right, I'm wrong lets forget about it because I'm wasting my time