nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Unpopular Opinions.

acidskiffle

Probably been done before but without getting too extreme,do you have any opinions most people you know seem to disagree with?
I happen to think Bono is a sound lad.

Mod note: last time a thread like this was made a lot of people were banned.
If your opinion is too extreme you probably shouldn't post it.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Chazz Michael Michaels

kunst nugget wrote: »

But Fine Gael and Labour were offering just as many 'freebies' in their election manifestos before the recession. The problem was that Fianna Fail had been in power at the right time when the economy started to rise and so were able to ride the crest of the wave. Looking at the way Fine Gael are running things makes me think that, sadly, no other potential government would have done things differently.

Ok, this is straying rather far from the point. Even in the face of the impending crisis (2007) people still voted for the very party that ran them into difficulty. Why? Because this was the same party that kept the freebies flowing. The crisis was caused by the greed of ordinary citizens, free money, houses for everyone, two holidays a year, low taxes; they voted in droves for this and something had to give eventually. But no one wanted to know and kept voting for the party to continue.

People say they couldn't have seen it coming. No? Pick up a history book. It happens over and over.

kunst nugget

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

I didn't say that.

But Fine Gael and Labour were offering just as many 'freebies' in their election manifestos before the recession. The problem was that Fianna Fail had been in power at the right time when the economy started to rise and so were able to ride the crest of the wave. Looking at the way Fine Gael are running things makes me think that, sadly, no other potential government would have done things differently.

Chazz Michael Michaels

kunst nugget wrote: »

but to say that they were the only party promising the sun, moon and stars during the Celtic Tiger is completely untrue.

I didn't say that.

kunst nugget

Neeson wrote: »

Well it's important to look after yourself and do all you can to prevent illness.

You'd probably be better exposing yourself more to the dirt around you and developing a natural resistance to germs than spending your days wiping down and hoovering surfaces in public places tbh.

kunst nugget

Chazz Michael Michaels wrote: »

It is mostly the Irish peoples fault why this country is in this mess. Time after time voting in the party that gave away the most "freebies", only to be astonished to find that the money magically ran out.

Yes, because not one other party made outlandish claims of what they'd do when if they were in power and no other party ever gave out saying that the party in government hadn't spent enough money.

I have no love for Fianna Fail in any way, shape or form but to say that they were the only party promising the sun, moon and stars during the Celtic Tiger is completely untrue.

Neeson

kunst nugget wrote: »

Ah, come on… I'd be pretty fastidious about cleaning my hands during the day but that is taking it to a whole new level of germophobia. That's no way to live your life…

Well it's important to look after yourself and do all you can to prevent illness.

kunst nugget

Neeson wrote: »

Wipes aren't a big deal. People carry tissues in their pocket so why not wipes? You can get these small types of hoovers to clean up anything foul which might not be eradicated with a wipe. They are handy for cloth surfaces like seats on buses, taxis, the Luas, etc.

This is what i'm talking about:

Ah, come on… I'd be pretty fastidious about cleaning my hands during the day but that is taking it to a whole new level of germophobia. That's no way to live your life…

Neeson

kunst nugget wrote: »

I really can't figure out if you're joking or not. Do you bring a packet of anti-septic wipes and a mini-hoover with you everywhere you go?

Wipes aren't a big deal. People carry tissues in their pocket so why not wipes? You can get these small types of hoovers to clean up anything foul which might not be eradicated with a wipe. They are handy for cloth surfaces like seats on buses, taxis, the Luas, etc.

This is what i'm talking about:

Chazz Michael Michaels

It is mostly the Irish peoples fault why this country is in this mess. Time after time voting in the party that gave away the most "freebies", only to be astonished to find that the money magically ran out.

ferike1

The Irish language should just be left to its own devices. If it survives great, if not, that's life.

NegativeCreep

Neeson wrote: »

After building work you can get the house disinfected. But nowadays people have to go out wiping seats in restaurants and bringing mini hand hoovers to clean any mess left on the cloth-type seats you find on buses and taxis.

I have yet to see a single person do this. Are you Niles Crane?

kunst nugget

Neeson wrote: »

After building work you can get the house disinfected. But nowadays people have to go out wiping seats in restaurants and bringing mini hand hoovers to clean any mess left on the cloth-type seats you find on buses and taxis.

I really can't figure out if you're joking or not. Do you bring a packet of anti-septic wipes and a mini-hoover with you everywhere you go?

Neeson

HalloweenJack wrote: »

Well, sometimes you can see the waistband of their knickers stretching over the waistband of the pyjamas. Other times, you can see the lines of their knickers through their pyjamas so, in those cases, the question is answered.

Otherwise, I'm guessing you just assume people don't wear knickers but you've nothing to back it up with.

I've no doubt some of them wear knickers, especially during the winter months. But you'd see some without any under-layer during the balmy summer months.

HalloweenJack

Neeson wrote: »

But you don't know what the day wearers do and nobody else does unless they pull off their pants. Therefore people worry about the potential spread of infection.

Well, sometimes you can see the waistband of their knickers stretching over the waistband of the pyjamas. Other times, you can see the lines of their knickers through their pyjamas so, in those cases, the question is answered.

Otherwise, I'm guessing you just assume people don't wear knickers but you've nothing to back it up with.

MaxSteele

John Lennon is more famous for crap life slogans than being a decent musician.

The Inbetweeners is muck. A load of socially awkward dorks making **** jokes about getting fanny and whatnot. Load of poo IMO. Film was just as bad too.

Neeson

kunst nugget wrote: »

I'd be more worried about builders inability to keep their flabby arses in their jeans than pyjama girls in that instance...

After building work you can get the house disinfected. But nowadays people have to go out wiping seats in restaurants and bringing mini hand hoovers to clean any mess left on the cloth-type seats you find on buses and taxis.

Quorum

Neeson wrote: »

It's not hygienic. If a woman was sitting in a café with pyjamas on she may spread infection. No underwear and feces or urine stained onto pyjamas and the risk of that being spread onto other members of the public.

Let's face it, this isn't why people don't like it.

kunst nugget

Neeson wrote: »

But you don't know what the day wearers do and nobody else does unless they pull off their pants. Therefore people worry about the potential spread of infection.

I'd be more worried about builders inability to keep their flabby arses in their jeans than pyjama girls in that instance...

kunst nugget

HalloweenJack wrote: »

I don't think it's strictly a thing for people on the dole.

It's where it originates from and thus why it seems to enrage people so much.

Neeson

HalloweenJack wrote: »

From being in several relationships and spending the nights with girls, I know that the only time I've seen girls not put knickers on was when they were sleeping naked.

But you don't know what the day wearers do and nobody else does unless they pull off their pants. Therefore people worry about the potential spread of infection.

HalloweenJack

Neeson wrote: »

Do you ask every girl that question?

From being in several relationships and spending the nights with girls, I know that the only time I've seen girls not put knickers on was when they were sleeping naked.

kunst nuggest wrote:

It's basically telling everyone you're powered by the dole.

I don't think it's strictly a thing for people on the dole.

Neeson

HalloweenJack wrote: »

In my experience, I've never known a girl who doesn't wear knickers under her pyjamas and I'd find it odd that some do.

Do you ask every girl that question?

DesperateDan

Neeson wrote: »

It's not hygienic. If a woman was sitting in a café with pyjamas on she may spread infection. No underwear and feces or urine stained onto pyjamas and the risk of that being spread onto other members of the public.

You're one of those people that doesn't like touching door handles aren't you

kunst nugget

Neeson wrote: »

It's not hygienic. If a woman was sitting in a café with pyjamas on she may spread infection. No underwear and feces or urine stained onto pyjamas and the risk of that being spread onto other members of the public.

I reckon it has absolutely nothing to do with that. Going around wearing your pyjamas all day is a general fück you to society. The person is basically saying to everybody that they don't have to bother their holes getting dressed like normal people because they don't need to work. It's basically telling everyone you're powered by the dole.

HalloweenJack

Neeson wrote: »

No underwear and feces or urine stained onto pyjamas and the risk of that being spread onto other members of the public.

In my experience, I've never known a girl who doesn't wear knickers under her pyjamas and I'd find it odd that some do.

Also, just because someone isn't wearing pyjamas doesn't mean they don't have the same kind of stains on their clothes.

Neeson

HalloweenJack wrote: »

What's with all the hate for people wearing pyjamas?

If that's how they want to dress, so be it. I see a lot of people wearing stuff I wouldn't wear but I couldn't give a crap about them 'cause it's not me.

The people getting their knickers in a knot about what other people wear are just control freaks.

It's not hygienic. If a woman was sitting in a café with pyjamas on she may spread infection. No underwear and feces or urine stained onto pyjamas and the risk of that being spread onto other members of the public.

HalloweenJack

What's with all the hate for people wearing pyjamas?

If that's how they want to dress, so be it. I see a lot of people wearing stuff I wouldn't wear but I couldn't give a crap about them 'cause it's not me.

The people getting their knickers in a knot about what other people wear are just control freaks.

Jimoslimos

e_e wrote: »

Tea with milk is fecking vile.

FYP

Milk on its own is gorgeous though!

MJ23

Tea with brown Sauce is Delish

e_e

Tea with milk is fecking vile.