daviddwyer wrote: » Havent read through all the thread but how in the name of god did a bank lend to this man in 2004... he would have been 64 years old. i thought all mortgages had to be paid in full by age 65. If this man had been a developer NAMA would have came in and bailed him and all his other properties out - just like they did with all the other builders who didnt pay the mortgages on any of their propertiesif you are not a banker or a developer in this country - you are screwed
Deleted User wrote: » I think the couple are at fault in this, but i question the fact the bank can get 6 - 7 garda out there for that, and i cant get the garda to my house after a robbery.
vikingdub wrote: » # That is your opinion and speculation, not proof of what happened. I am looking for links to reports of the court case and details of how and when the repossession order was granted. By the way a number of poster here seem to be confusing this couple with the O'Donnells who owe €72 million.
jimmurt wrote: » Do you have an alternative? If the bank gave you a contract to get these people off their property, how would you do it?
danger mouse wrote: » Putting aside all the comments about how wealthy these home owners where and frankly i couldn't care less if they where oil barons.But personally I have a huge problem with the fact that these men who where not Garda, where able to removed these people from a property with impunity. I feel personally like it was an assault and this aspect of the case makes me feel sick. If anyone else wants to misquote me and think I'm supporting the couple can read my posts again and you will see I'm not. I'm just angry and worried that these so called "bailiffs" can come along and drag someone off their property. That is my thoughts on this matter and im not gonna say much more.
hondasam wrote: » oranbhoy67 wrote: » the girl filming it seems to be having an orgasm She sounded like she was in pain to me.
oranbhoy67 wrote: » the girl filming it seems to be having an orgasm
evilivor wrote: » They are united by a love of camping…
bensweeney wrote: » Somehow I dont feel sympathy for the D4 elite!
JoeGil wrote: » Someone needs to explain to them that campaigning for a property magnate doesn't fit in with what they are supposed to stand for.
Larbre34 wrote: » I hear the Occupy Dame Street gentlefolk have indeed staged a sit-in at the Dublin City Sheriff's office in Temple Bar. Someone needs to explain to them, in words of one syllable, that the Sheriff with jurisdiction over 'County' Dublin, i.e. the 3 Councils excluding the City, therefore including Killiney, is based in Ballyboggan Road, Finglas. :rolleyes: F*ckwits.
smash wrote: » "Minister Gilmore said that he will make contact with the couple to see what can be done." If he helps them out, there will be murder!
Duckjob wrote: » I hope Gilmore falls flat on his gee over this. He's a "see which way the political wind is blowing and follow it" spineless sh*te-hawk.
prinz wrote: » Did I hear it correctly on the radio this morning that the mortgage was €2 million, or the house was bought for €2 million or something? If it was any pity I had for them went right out the window.
bullvine wrote: » Anybody got a link to the old man's interview on Newstalk?
HeidiHeidi wrote: » I thought I'd heard that, but then decided I must have imagined it :eek: Occupy Dame Street? Or did I imagine that bit
Ghost Buster wrote: » Its actually a 'non home ownership' tax. A tax levied on those who rent or are over 18 but live at home and so are not contributing via house hold charge, water rates, septic tank rates etc.
ejmaztec wrote: » Another obscure tax, Nose-hair Tax I believe is today's effort.
Deleted User wrote: » I wonder if they paid the household tax
mathie wrote: » What other news is be unveiled today that these actors are bumping off the front pages?
