STB wrote: » Its nothing personal ! Panasonic may well be top class in your mind, but their basic operation in Ireland has to be questioned if not certified given their previous form. Feature set !!!! Dony you think that the basics should be available in your L model given they are advertised for Ireland! Look I only suggest you google Panasonic and boards.ie and you will understand my justification for only a "moron would recommend".....
tui0hcg wrote: » OK - but show me what basics are not available that Panasonic have advertised for this TV? Everything seems to work for me - DVB-S feed is fine DVB-T feed is fine it seems that the TV is operating as expected and basically doing its job of providing a combo set of TV feeds When I bought this TV I was also looking for a combo TV and after a small amount of research I got this and it is preforming excatly as it said on the tin. I was obviusly delighted that I could pick up Saorview and Freesat so thats all I expected
STB wrote: » MHEG5 is a minimum requirement for Digital TV in Ireland. It was a minumum requirement in 2008 when first published. Your TV was marketed for Ireland in 2010 ? And still doesnt have the basic digital TV requirements for this country. Other countries I am sure have !
tui0hcg wrote: » The TV is not certified or advertised to work with Saorview so I don’t see where the minimum requirement even enters the equationThe OP asked for a list of TVs with dual inputs and this is one of those TVsDont want to bicker as I see your point but I am only providing information on a TV that fits the bill for the OP
tui0hcg wrote: » The TV fits the bill for the OPI recommend it you don’t End of.
STB wrote: » Nothing personal. You have your view. I have mine and I hope I have backed up the reasons why. I am glad you are happy with your Irish marketed Panasonic TV despite it missing the basic requirements for Irish Digital TV enjoyment. Of course we have had this discussion before. MHEG5 isnt the be all and end all and if that was the only downfall then maybe it isnt the worst shortcoming compared with those in the past. Do be aware that the L model range are only now and next on the Satellite EPG which goes against the reasoning for the majority who buy combo TVs in the first instance ie Freesat software. Who would be a consumer eh ?
championc wrote: » Their BONUS was suddenly gone. Owners got upset that Panny wouldn't change firmware to do something for which the Panny's were never intended.
NewHillel wrote: » Silly me, there was I thinking that a Tv sold in Ireland should be able to pick up Irish TV broadcasts! Time was Panasonic would have been top of my list. No longer.
championc wrote: » Anti Panasonic threads all started after 04 Nov 2010 when 100% previously satisfied Panny owners suddenly wanted their TV's to give them access to something for which the product was never intended to feature and for which the feature in the product was also not bought for. People had bought LZ81's and G10L's (and others) and were delighted with them. Along came the Saorview "trial" and all of a sudden people had a BONUS of access using these TV's which were also able to pick up UK Freeview channels due to the MPEG-2 decoders on-board. So owners were celebrating having access to the Irish channels in glorious digital. Saorview was then "officially" launched on 31 Oct 2010 and the joy continued. Then, on 04 Nov 2010, the codec flag was changed from 0x01 to 0x16. There was no change in the transmission signals but the problem occurred when a "Freeview" set tried to scan looking for 0x01 channels and found none. Their BONUS was suddenly gone. Owners got upset that Panny wouldn't change firmware to do something for which the Panny's were never intended. Ever since, the Panny's have been slagged off by several people. I 100% agree with tui0hcg that the Panny's sold do exactly what they promise. We all know that with a bit of effort, Panny could make a perfect product - but that's not the point. Remember too that before the arrival of Sky and UPC boxes, the majority of sets sold in Ireland carried dual UHF and VHF equipped in order to cater for Cable customers. So certain features were sacrificed for the inclusion of the VHF. So I am quite sure that anyone who bought a Panny and who were unhappy with them would have bought them straight back to where they came from but in all honesty, you can't go trying to return stuff a year or so later when it was previously the greatest thing ever.
STB wrote: » No. Totally untrue. The threads started a LONG time before that. It started with the PZ81 range released for HD Freesat and DVB-T in 2008/9. I suggest you search before jumping to Panasonic's defence with complete nonsense.History Panasonic released their first HD combo TV range in mid 2008. Combo means a DVB-T and DVB-S tuners. These combos have an MPEG4 processor on board to decode the HD broadcasts from the Satellite tuner via Freesat (MPEG4 broadcasts) and a DVB-T tuner which to the spec meant they had the capability to decode MPEG4 broadcasts via DVB-T . And they did initially when RTE first broadcast MPEG4 (from day 1) but with an MPEG2 data descriptor. When RTE changed this dvb descriptor in early 2009 people soon discovered through this forum that the software on the Panasonic combo TVs were deliberately crippled to disallow the reception of anything not flagged 0x01 which is MPEG2 broadcasts even though the hardware can decode (and did) MPEG4 broadcasts. This was through the fault of deliberately short written firmware. People have taken to hacking these TVs through the use of hotel files given that no solution was offered to these purchasers in Ireland by Panasonic. Secondly there was NO RTE Trial. There was a DCMNR trial with BT which finished in July 2008. In August 2008 RTE started broadcasting DVB-T MPEG4 broadcasts and gradually started kitting and rolling out the main TX sites around the country. Initially these broadcasts did use the 0x01 descriptor. It changed in 2009 to 0x16 which is a flag for SD Advanced Codec of MPEG4. These were not defined in the 1st Panasonic Freesat HD Combo range of Pz81/LZD81. A few lines of code. Then LG released a range of Freesat Combo TVs in April 2009 (LF7700). LG didnt employ shortcuts in the firmware and the TVs work fine with Saorview and have the full suite of DVB-T flags defined. Then Panasonic released their 2nd range of Freesat Combo Tvs in mid 2009 - the G10b/15b range which again had shortcuts in the firmware for DVB-T reception in Ireland. People have taken to hacking them via the onboard hex editor as no other solution has been made available. Then Sony released a Freesat Combo range (W5810) and like LG didnt employ Panasonic's narrow interpretation of what the TV should and shouldn't decode on the DVB-T side. It is only NOW in the TV you bought (the G20b) that the consumer doesnt have to second guess what Panasonic have or havent employed as shortcuts. And the reason for that ? The full list of service descriptors MUST be defined for the terrestrial tuner for Freeview HD whih uses the MPEG4 processor and requires the full list ! Bonuses indeed! Bottom line. Panasonic were the only manufacturer of Combo TVs NOT to define the full list of services in their DVB-T/DVB-S Freesat range. As a footnote to all of this given the uncertainty employed by manufacturers in how they ship and pre-program TVs with certain standards (or not) of countries published standards, RTENL had to introduce a certification process. This is where manufacturers submit their suitable products to Terracom for bench testing and can then be sold with Saorview certification badge, if they pass. Walker where the first to get certification in 2010. Since then an additional 16 other manufacturing TV brands have received Saorview certification. Panasonic is not among them.
1.2. Document History Version Date Status Comments 0.1 09-11-2008 Draft Initial draft document based on Teracom ACD 2.0 document 0.1b 11-11-2008 Draft Comment 0.1 draft – Teracom comment; Per Tullstedt and Petri Hyvärinen 0.1c 17-12-2008 Draft Amendments to 0.1b draft - Marcus O’Doherty 1.0 19-12-2008 Edition 1 Final amendments to 0.1c draft – Marcus O’Doherty 2.0 24-10-2010 Edition 2 NorDig 2.2 update – Deasún Mac Giolla an Chloig
joceadaigh wrote: » In my opinion Panasonic have nothing to answer for in regards TVs sold in Ireland prior to their Range under development from 2009, and probably released in 2010. That said I do believe in future proofing technology for the good of consumers. I also believe that legislation should have been passed soon after the publication of the first edition of the document that at a specified date all TV sold in Ireland should include these minimum requirements, and any TVs lacking this be bundles with a set-top-box. I also think that if the release of a firmware update for certain TV sets is feasible the National Consumer Agency should take up this issue. I think the Authorities responsible have made a huge mess of the digital switchover and I don't think Panasonic are to take the blame for that. Can anyone tell me can a firmware update add mpeg4 capabilities to a DVB-T Mpeg2 (freeview) TV? As an owner of a FreeviewHD PVR and live in an overspill area i would always advise people to consider a FreeviewHD appliance over Saorview... But my original post is really looking for DVB-T2 and S2 TV...
joceadaigh wrote: » 1. Can anyone tell me can a firmware update add mpeg4 capabilities to a DVB-T Mpeg2 (freeview) TV? 2. As an owner of a FreeviewHD PVR and live in an overspill area i would always advise people to consider a FreeviewHD appliance over Saorview... But my original post is really looking for DVB-T2 and S2 TV...
Sam Russell wrote: » It should be a basis for a campaigne for an upgrade of the UK D-Book to align with the Nordig 2.2 standard with the Freeview HD standard so that full interoperability is achieved, as was promised by the Memorandum of Understanding signed by our then Minister. The DCNER should be the body to take up the cudgel. There will be many UK viewers affected (in NI) and a small change is all that is needed. We know about LCN, Summertime, etc. Unfortunately, existing equipment is likely to be excluded. I will not hold my breath.
STB wrote: » My understanding is that there is a working group of DCENR and UK DCMS which are looking at among other things, interoperability issues for NI.
STB wrote: » 2. You are in an overspill area. Others in Ireland not in overspill areas will not require the DVB-T2 tuner. (I hadnt actually noticed the T2 tuner requirement, so my initial answer should be treated as such).
My understanding is that there is a working group of DCENR and UK DCMS which are looking at among other things, interoperability issues for NI.
joceadaigh wrote: » There is no guaranty that RTENL or anyone other future bradcaster/authority will not change to T2 some time in the future. I understand it is unlike in the near future, but it only took the UK 12 to change. I think it was a mistake on RTENL/DCENR not to adopt T2 from the beginning... but that's in the past. A commercial wing to saorview may find T2 preferable.
The Cush wrote: » Not much happening in this area according to Saorview: Brian - http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=76015283
STB wrote: » Then Panasonic released their 2nd range of Freesat Combo Tvs in mid 2009 - the G10b/15b range which again had shortcuts in the firmware for DVB-T reception in Ireland.