earlyevening wrote: » What about all the unsold Mercedes cars in the country? We could give them to single mothers too.
realies wrote: » Just asking, Who would decide what single mother lived with what single mother, and as most if not all single mothers are very young who would control the finances as in Bill payments,Rubbish collections etc, cant see it working to be honest.
Rabidlamb wrote: » The housing lists are backed up & a lot of pressure is being put on councils. I've had this solution for sometime now, it's a bit incendiary but this might be the time to roll it out.Single mothers who don't want to live with their parents & declare the father absent can share a house with another single mother in the same situation. Before you get all Kevin Myers on my ass think about it, it would cut down on the couples who commit welfare fraud by secretly living with their partner. It would halve the single mothers on the waiting list in no time & might prove a disincentive to those who still choose it as a lifestyle choice.
Rabidlamb wrote: » It would halve the single mothers on the waiting list in no time & might prove a disincentive to those who still choose it as a lifestyle choice.
irish-stew wrote: » Do we have that many aditional 4 bedroom houses going spare?
CreepingDeath wrote: » Phase out childrens allowance altogether, so the lower classes can't afford to breed like rats.
earlyevening wrote: » We could reduce unemployment significantly by employing cooks, gardeners, chauffers, handymen etc to help these manless single mothers. ; )
Rabidlamb wrote: » It's their choice whether or not they leave mammy, same as anyone growing up. Most houses will have an incumbent so let them decide from the 3 candidates near the top of the list.
chucken1 wrote: » So the mothers you seem to be talking abut are very young?? Im a bit confused....why are you not addressing the problems of older mothers?
mackg wrote: » Don't forget gigolos, they might be mothers but they still have needs!
El Weirdo wrote: » Rent Allowance/Supplement needs to be cut in order to make it more financially feasable for people to take offers of social housing. At present many families are better off in private rented accommodation with the state paying their rent than they would be in social housing paying €75p/w in rent.
Rabidlamb wrote: » You don't need additional, that's the beauty of it.
dublin daz wrote: » Sure we might as well just open up the convents / industrial schools. That would reduce the housing list by 100% While I don't agree with fraud, I think the family, in any form married or unmarried deserve to live off the state & all hardworking taxpayers.
Ricardo G wrote: » Its easier to spell MILF
chucken1 wrote: » Do you know I just discovered that :eek: We pay 70 a week out of 312 whereas a friend of mine in Dublin is paying 24 a week in a private rental. Something a bit odd there...
El Weirdo wrote: » Exactly. Many councils would slash their housing lists if they enforced the rules on refusing offers of housing, too.