liah wrote: » I don't get this case at all. The woman plotted to kill them, but didn't actually. The men who did kill them, however, only got the life sentence. Meanwhile the woman who only plotted but outside of that, did nothing, gets killed? Can someone explain this a little better? Why are the murderers not on trial? Why was her case of plotting murder worth breaking 100 years of no capital punishment? Why was HER crime so heinous that it was brought back? I'm clearly missing something.
LarrytheLantern wrote: » she was tried and found guilty by a jury of her peers. they were presented with the FACTS. we were not. we can only speculate and guess as to what those facts were/are. i have no problem with this verdict. Justice has been served.
ScumLord wrote: » Americans don't really believe injections or any other method of execution they use is really all that humane. It's well known the most humane way to kill any animal is through inert gas which causes no suffering. But Americans that support the execution don't want murderers and the like to have a comfortable death. They like the thought of the person suffering but don't actually want to have to see too much suffering.
PaddyBomb wrote: » Because any person I seen using the word "awesome" looked mentally retarded.
thebaz wrote: » do you get a choice how you die - I'd select firing squad - no feckin around with poison or fires - what do they use in Switzerland, at that place where you can die early ?
PeakOutput wrote: » no method is instant. after being shot in the chest or even beheaded you are still very much alive for at least a few seconds after it happens as far as i know lethal injection is started with a sedative so you are asleep or so out of it you cant feel or comprehend anything. it definitely seems like the most painless way choice if you ever had to make that decision
PeakOutput wrote: » as far as i know lethal injection is started with a sedative so you are asleep or so out of it you cant feel or comprehend anything. it definitely seems like the most painless way choice if you ever had to make that decision
sbsquarepants wrote: » I think my IQ is about 72 today, twice i read the thread title as "virgin executes woman" I blame arthurs day. Apparently the most painless way to execute someone is in a decompression chamber, don't think anywhere does it though.
Trekmad wrote: » That is what they want you to believe, but unfortunately anybody who has had the treatment isn't here to tell if that is actually true.
Death penalty stinks, its not justice its state sanctioned murder / revenge killing. Really wish the Americans ideas of justice and punishment would get with the times.
PeakOutput wrote: » they dont need to be here to tell us how it feels,science is pretty accurate about these things. the previous poster suggested that it was painfull because intravenous drug users suffer more due to a lack of good veins, im not an intravenous drug user so barring human error i fail to see how this method can be so painful its not revenge although im sure the family of the victims feel like it is revenge. it is the state trying to protect its citizens from the future actions of a murderer. once you deliberately and illegally take another human beings life you have no right to the protection of your life anymore and the state has every right to treat you as they see fit for the protection of the rest of society. weather this be life in prison or execution i dont care but the moment you went threw with murder is the moment you give up every other right imo
PeakOutput wrote: » its not revenge although im sure the family of the victims feel like it is revenge. it is the state trying to protect its citizens from the future actions of a murderer. once you deliberately and illegally take another human beings life you have no right to the protection of your life anymore and the state has every right to treat you as they see fit for the protection of the rest of society. weather this be life in prison or execution i dont care but the moment you went threw with murder is the moment you give up every other right imo
Carlos_Ray wrote: » Plus I don't see how the fact that she is more intelligent than the average woman is relevant to the issue....
SV wrote: » IBLin before liah
Uriel. wrote: » Lethal injection is (often) not a nice way to go. Crazy that the two hitmen weren't given the death penalty as well. I guess they provided the the evidence that convicted her.
LarrytheLantern wrote: » her sex ought NOT to be the issue, nor should her IQ level (unless she were deemed totally mentally retarded, which she were not). also the facts of the case are not in doubt, so it seems the only thing folk are arguing about is, should she have been executed or not? personally i do not like the death penalty, but there are certain crimes (ie crimes against children, &/or where unspeakable cruelty has been used), which if proven beyond all doubt (and it would need to be 100% imo) should attract the death penalty. where we are dealing with these type of crimes, then i would not lose a minutes sleep if the perpetrators were hung, poisoned, electrocuted or stoned, although personally i would favour hanging as it's the cheapest and we are in a recession.
Flojo wrote: » Exactly and why should tax payers have to pay for them being cold calculated murderers, rid the planet of the scum... also over crowding in prisons if a major issue! I just wish the justice system could be more accurate in who they execute to prevent innocent people being sent to death row, ie only choose it for people once they have the facts set in stone along with a confession maybe!
RMD wrote: » The US think they've a high horse on the moral matter of the death sentence simply because they do it in a "humane" way. There is no humane way in execution, it's barbaric. Stoning is horrible, but just because the US use lethal injection doesn't make them any form of authority on the matter.
Flojo wrote: » She actually did! "Lewis admitted organising the slaying of her husband Julian and his son Charles to claim their life insurance premiums."
Trekmad wrote: » Don't even know how to respond to that comment
goose2005 wrote: » Sounds clever enough to me. Couldn't she just have, you know, got the IQ test questions wrong on purpose?