I'm listening wrote: » Think no one is disagreeing with preference, think it was over going straight from Reserve to full with a few extra classes, which is crazy. It's grand the way it is without the preference aswell, the Reserves will stand to ya during the process anyway, helped me a lot during the interview for the full time. If preference was to come in, in the future the Reserve selection process will have to move to the same lines as full time, I know people who have failed the application process for full time countless times and get the Reserves first time. Something wrong there!
Huxley Shallow Hedgehog wrote: » With all due respect to any fulltime member. I completly disagree that a reserve should not be prefrence over a normal member of the public just because they pass an alptitude test??. When the next drive eventually opens up your going to get every joe soap applying that never had an interest in joining in his life and trust me many people that are joining for all the wrong reasons will slip through the net AND will take many reserves places that have been given there free time for a couple of years all because they done better on a test? In my opinion thats ridiculous. And i myself do not see the reserves as a back way in i see it as a stepping stone and realise i (we) will have to go through the same process as everybody else. Why not give prefrence to somebody they know has the drive for the job and can do the job good than take a risk on somebody that performed well on a test and in interview?
Bosco boy wrote: » If all things are equal and it comes down between choosing a person who has not been in the reserve and a person who has been in the reserve then the person who has been in the reserve should have the advantage and be selected. The application process for a reserve should be as stringent as the full time one.
nice guy always wrote: » Reserves are just that....Reserves.
nice guy always wrote: » Right......i've sat and listened long enough. This is a place for discussion, not arguing. Everyone is entitled to their view. Mine is simple......I believe a Reserve should not get preference to a normal applicant. Last year I would have said the vast majority of Reserves were brutal.....but since two I know were sacked the rest we got were great works and great people with their heads screwed on. This changed my view. However, there are several great people who would make great polis who cannot commit to being a Reserve, hense why I wouldnt like to see Reserves getting preference. They like everyone else should be taken on their aptitude. A transfer course from Reserve to Garda would not work. Full stop. I also cannot see it ever happening. No Reserves here can say what they want about my VIEW but most Reserves here will know I fully back Reserves and what they do (as long as they are capable). Its not us versus them.........There is no them. Its us.....again however, Reserves are just that....Reserves. Now mod warning to follow....please stay tuned...This will NOT become a pissing match.:mad: If it does I will ban everyone......yes everyone and close the thread for a few weeks. Thanks for watching:)
lavman wrote: » YOU'RE BLUFFING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Story1970 wrote: » Reserves are Reserves blah, blah blah .... Attested Garda Reserve officers are members of An Garda Siochana and should be afforded respect in a similar manner to those who are full time !!!! On a side issue why would you mention that two reserve members were sacked ? when recent national news coverage related to misconduct issues concerning full time members ?
EGOSHEA wrote: » To be fair, out of some 14,500 members, it's more than likely that stories regarding anything to do with AGS will feature full-timers (including when they do well and help the public). Let's not turn this into a case of 'us versus them' - the reserve is a blip in terms of the numbers. I've also heard from some full-timers in my area that a small number of reserves are disasters. The truth will be displayed by dedicated reserves who don't hold their role against that of the professional service.
Bosco boy wrote: » your a member of AGS when you are on the full time payroll, if your a doctor and a reserve you are a doctor, if your a barman and a reserve you are a barman and so on and so on. Just cause someone was in the FCA dosent mean that they were in the army. If your a teachers aid you are not a teacher, if you are a nurses aid you are not a nurse, get the picture! If you cant get into the job full time then you dont deserve to be in it. it was a silly former FCA member who thought he was ex army who created this mess, thanks Michael but you got your answer in the last election!
psni wrote: » A reserve member has the same powers, immunities, privileges and duties as a person who holds the rank of Garda, however they only patrol in the presence of, and under the supervision of full-time members. .
psni wrote: » Immune from RTA while on duty. Privilege of protecting communities from scumbags.