BlackandGold wrote: » they'd have to sell it for me for that as it was clearly marked as €43!!!
Gauge wrote: » Sorry to single this part out but the retail worker inside me is screaming- no, they wouldn't have had to sell it to you at that price.
lgoring21 wrote: » the amount of profit they are makin on the clothes is unbelivable....add a couple of 00's at the end cause it has a tiny hilfiger flag on it...a lot of the times i have bought a few bits and bob designer and the quailty isnt great on them... if i buy penneys i dont expect it to last forever.... if i buy in brown thomas i expect it to last forever:D:rolleyes:
BlackandGold wrote: » If it is advertised as that, surely it's not sticking to the rules of advertising? It's completely false and misleading. Yes I know a John Rocha coat would cost more than that but still. It's not MY fault they put the wrong price on it. And it wasn't another tag or label that was stuck on top of it by someone else - that's the way it was printed.
BlackandGold wrote: » Nice or not, £75 for a t shirt?!!! OMG!!!
tribulus wrote: » In relation to the OP, I don't mind spending extra if it's worth it in terms of quality/fit but I certainly wouldn't pay extra just for the label.
Lia_lia wrote: » I've never (bar my debs dress) payed over €100 for an item of clothing/pair of shoes. About 80% of my clothes come from sales. I just don't feel the need to buy expensive designer labels! And I don't understand this wearing a dress only 1 or 2 times thing. A lot of my friends are like that. I always get loads of wear out my clothes. I also try to buy clothes that I know won't go out of fashion in 3 months.