Skeptical Resources for Conspircy Theories.

trentf wrote: »

read em all all hogwash of the highest order...see heres the point when you have as i have posted the video for the owner of WORLD TRADE CENTER number 7 saying 'so we had to pull the building, and they made that decision to pull' with his own mouth on video i don't think theres any skeptical magazine,article or person on earth thats going to debunk that now is there?

once again for you skeptics out there who seem to have a problem understanding common english words heres the video again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk

Problem #1, Larry Silverstein is not a demolition contractor, neither was the fire department chief, so why should we assume they’d be using slang demolition terms?

Problem #2, Silverstein says "they made that decision to pull", for instance -- the Fire Department. If "pull" means "demolish", then he's saying the Fire Department may not have decided to bring the building down if they couldn't contain the fire, but because it was beyond them, they decided to blow it up. Does this make sense?

Problem #3, Silverstein is suggesting that the decision to demolish the building was optional. It might not have happened. Does this fit with the idea of a convenient insurance scam?

Problem #4, why would the Fire Department willingly agree to engage in a multi-million dollar insurance fraud?

Problem #5, and since when do Fire Departments blow up buildings anyway?

Problem #6, and if it's so obvious that WTC7 was demolished, then why are the insurance companies not suing Silverstein for fraud?

Problem #7, and why would Silverstein admit this on television?