eveie wrote: » also it is scientifictly documentated and agreed that from the monent of conception there exists a human being, if you dont deny that they you must believe the world is flat.
eveie wrote: » as i stated before its in scientifictly proven that from the moment of conception there exists a human being, therefore the taking away of life from this human being is wrong, no one can argue with that. i think alot of women are pushed into situatuions, no body can see where im coming from. i wouldnt say this subject is black and white for me, im not here putting down women, for Gods sake im a women myslef, ive sympathy and empathy for women in this position and you know, you dont know me or know what ive gone through so maybe you shouldnt judge me, as i havent judged anyone here
eveie wrote: » il hold my hands up i was completely wrong about ireland being the only european country that doesnt have legalised abortions,
eveie wrote: » as well as the MAP theres a aborticafacient
eveie wrote: » pill called 486,this pill has killed 18 women worldwide,
eveie wrote: » yet the head of the I.F.P.A refuses to acknowledge this,
eveie wrote: » where is his concern for womens health? woemn dont seem to understand that the majority of these organisations were set up for profit, they are making millions from terminating pregnancies every year, they dont really care for you, if they did they'd give youi proper support and wouldnt violate your body.
About IFPA The IFPA (Irish Family Planning Association) is a national voluntary organisation and registered charity which has been pioneering reproductive health and rights in Ireland since 1969. The brave women and men who founded the Association were concerned with changing the social and legal environment in Ireland so that family planning information and services would be available to everyone.
eveie wrote: » i am not for one minute condeming any women who chooses to have an abortion i am however saying that abortion is wrong (would like to say something else but im not allowed to here)
Thaedydal wrote: » Why because they just do not want to be pregnant and give birth to a child.
Nerin wrote: » Easy there thaed,check your quote,
eveie wrote: » i am not in the slightest bit impressed that you think that ive used scare tactics! it is true and documented that there IS a direct link between certain types of cancer and abortion. also research carried out in sweeden and findland has discovered that a women who has had an abortion is 6 times more likely to commit suicide. they are more likely to be drug abusers etc. the major issue people have with for instance "youth defence" is their use of graphic pictures that show aborted babies. people seem to have a major issue with this? why? many people have lost a loved one through a car accident and find it very distressing to watch a advertisment showing the effects of speeding etc yet they dont kick up blue murder about it. and as we all know some of these advertisments are very graphic,and in fact they use scare tactics to try and prevent us from drink driving/speeding.now i will say there is a time and a place for this and i do not agree with many of the things that they do. if you were to show a child these pictures they would ask "what happened the baby" if a child can reconiose one of these beings as a baby then why cant we? i take great offfence in Thaedyal saying that i am scare mongering, i want an apology. anything i have stated here is facts, i am not altering them in anyway. when a women comes face to face with a crisis pregnancy do yo really think she is of the right mind frame to make the right decision, that is why its called a crisis, we do things in a crisis that we would never consider otherwise. unless you have evidence to show that what i said is a lie then you dont have the right to tell me im scare mongering. this really annoyes me, if women knew the side affects of abortion i believe many would choose not to have one.
eveie wrote: » just because thousands of women are choosing abortion does not make it right, if thats your logic we could say that drug dealers should be allowed become legal.
irishbird wrote: » None of them have ever felt sudicial, got breast cancer, split with their partners or regreted their decision.
ntlbell wrote: » My daughter is coming up to this age and as much as it would tear my heart out if she fell pregnant at that age as long as her life was not at risk I would want her to have the child.
WindSock wrote: » That aside, how come the overwhelming majority of Women (and Men) I talk to in this country seem to think that abortion should be legalised here, yet the referenda keep turning out No's?
tallaght01 wrote: » I think there's a little bit of a stigma attached to being anti-abortion. It's, ironically, a bit like saying you're a feminist.
tallaght01 wrote: » I personally think the thread is pretty civilised, compared to real-life conversations between the 2 sides of this debate.
tallaght01 wrote: » I'm no expert in this area, but I'm pretty sure that all the GOOD data shows no association between abortion and breat cancer.
eveie wrote: » i am well aware they do not provide 486 but that is something their interested in and when questioned about the 18 women dying as a direct consquence of it they chose to ignore the question.
Despite impressive gains in safety in recent decades, pregnancy remains risky business. From early in pregnancy until some weeks after its conclusion, pregnant women are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared with women who are not pregnant. This review summarizes recent national data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including vital statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics. Ectopic pregnancy is substantially more dangerous (38 deaths/100,000 events) than either childbirth (nine) or legal abortion (less than one). The three leading causes of maternal death today are pregnancy-induced hypertension, hemorrhage, and pulmonary embolism. Although comprehensive data on pregnancy-related morbidity are lacking, about 22% of all pregnant women are hospitalized before delivery because of complications. Women of minority races have much higher risks of death than do white women, and the same holds true for older women and those with limited education. For most women, fertility regulation by contraception, sterilization, or legal abortion is substantially safer than childbirth.
irishbird wrote: » you know that and i know that but eveie said it was proven
rainbow kirby wrote: » You keep going on about 18 women dying as a result of taking RU-486 for a medically-induced abortion, yet you make no mention of women who die as a result of pregnancy complications or in childbirth as a result of carrying a child to term.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8178896
JC 2K3 wrote: » What referenda?