Slow coach wrote: » She's married, so she's rated by someone. Ergo, she IS overrated.
ibh wrote: » Do you mean overWEIGHTED?? I doubt very much that she is 'rated' by anyone except her husband.
The-Rigger wrote: » Ah she is a fox
The-Rigger wrote: » I bet she is a saucy little minx too.
Dragan wrote: » J-Lo I would happily turn her down just to see the look on her stupid fat face.
Dudess wrote: » She's not fat. Yeah, Justin is very over-rated in the looks department. Scarlett Johansson was too when Lost in Translation came out, but she's gotten hot since. I must say I think Kate Moss is absolutely stunning, but too thin to be sexy.
Jessica Alba, there's just something about her that I don't like
dobsdave wrote: » The main blondie wan in Sex in the City.dont know the name or character.
Terry wrote: » She is fat. Too many Tacos and Burritos.
hopalong85 wrote: » Scarlett Johansson has always been hot, particularly in lost in translation.
Dudess wrote: » Nah, she was fairly goofy-looking in Lost In Translation. http://www.gazette.uwo.ca/2004/January/29/Pics/08C%20Scarlett%20Johansson.jpg And Girl With a Pearl Earring. But since then, she has started to make the best of her looks with make-up. And her bod is to die for. Plus, she has that sexy, smokey-voiced thing going on.
Sarah Jessica Parker. And yes she's woeful
chopperbyrne wrote: In Lost in Translation, Scarlett Johansson looks like this: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/s...ANSLATION1.jpg
Hail 2 Da Chimp wrote: » Amy Winehouse... I mean WTF...
Unpossible wrote: » She always seemed really old and hagged to me
Dudess wrote: » There's a difference between getting lots of media attention and being over-rated in the looks department. I don't think anyone would argue that the following are undeservedly considered gorgeous: