Ah it was taken down. Can anyone describe what was in it please
I did. I couldn't see it! I searched "conor and dee VIDEO" "conor mcgregor" and "dee devlin" and it didn't bring anything up.
I would disagree strongly with that statement re: older people. Don’t know how old you are or your parents but with age also comes wisdom of experience. It may have been a legitimate issue say up to 15-20 years ago - talk of what the person was wearing and what that represented or how they might have “led on” someone -
but today, all people are far more aware of the issues around sexual consent, the inability of someone to provide consent when highly intoxicated etc
Your parents are likely very well experienced with such matters having lived through a time when issues of sexual consent were trivialised and fault and blame directed towards the victim. They will have friends or indeed even personal experience of such matters.
As a result they are probably more likely to not be sidetracked by “red herrings” or secondary issues that don’t take away from the primary issue of consent .
I was a jury member in a criminal trial a few years ago- the only person on that jury who had “doubts” of the persons guilt was someone in their 20s -the youngest member of the jury everyone else who were mid 30s-60s could clearly read the “red herrings” we were thrown
Id actually prefer a jury of 50+ year olds than a jury of 20+ year olds personally for this case.
I believe it was taken down. All the absolute cesspool, toxic posts left on there and he managed to get this taken down. Money talks.
I’ve no idea how the jury will go with this case- there’s a lot of evidence to weigh up. It’s rare we get so much detail on a civil case where the lower bar of balance of probability is used as the decision making tool.
I think the delivery of how the testimony was spoken from each contributor will be an influencing factor- something armchair observers, which we all are, won’t have heard. End of week 1 for me still remains very strong testimony and evidence -yes, there’s definitely now a lot more for the jury to consider as we approach the end of the trial .
However, the key focus for the jury will still be around what happened in the privacy of the bedroom - between two people. I don’t envy the jury on this case - it’s going to be a tough discussion
All over Twitter if you search
HIs legal problems are just beginning I suspect.
Based on what's I've read I'd vote guilty for Mcgregor. It all sounds dodgy as hell and she seems to be consistent with her story. It's a shame it isn't a crinimal case.
He might as well be retired at this stage. He he is found guilty here I can't see it stopping him fighting as this isn't a criminal case. Bear in mind the UFC and boxing is no stranger to criminals, rapists and woman beaters. With the new found love of Saudi by the UFC and boxing they'd never have a problem sanctioning a fight anyway though..
What is in the video with Conor and Dee?
That's a fairly ridiculous comment to make…………on many levels.
I mean just imagine the money she would make leaving him along with the outpouring of sympathy. She would be the Ultimate Z-lister until she finally succumbs to I'm a Celebrity fame where she bonds with a reformed Philip Schofield.
IInfairness Dee actually looks worse than mcgregor in all of this, which is something 😆
She's so helpless, being chained up and all.
Classic
what happened in the video?
She toes the line or else.
Those videos doing the rounds on social media which him a Dee in a rental property are embarrassing for them. Some fellas were recording them through the window. What sort of relationship has poor Dee found herself in.
Id say an open relationship would involve using condoms with other partners?
right eh , nothing got to do with what I said.
I don't think a lot of guys understand this. Sorry to be a bit graphic but…
In order for a tampon to get wedged at your cervix, you'd have to insert something (a vibrator or something) and wedge it up there yourself. You couldn't do it with a finger or an applicator. And while you can't feel a tampon if its inserted in the right place, I can tell you right now you'd painfully feel it if you pushed it so that it went sideways at your cervix. You'd also be at acute risk of toxic shock syndrome as the tampon would be in for more than eight hours. Finally, you'd find it very difficult to insert the tampon at all if you weren't on your period. You'd have to use lube to get it up there - and none of the reports mention lube being found on the tampon or inside her vagina.
Why - when your body is covered with bruises and you're alleging a rape - would you even contemplate doing that? Anyone who has ever had a smear test will tell you that having any instruments inserted to remove the tampon would be extremely uncomfortable.
It's like saying if someone was alleging that they were raped with a broken bottle "oh but they might have taken a knife to themselves and done the damage". Come on. Listen to yourselves.
The area being inside her, not exactly where the tampon was - it’s not that big an area where they can pick DNA from different areas!
McGregor gave evidence that there was no tampon and no obvious period when he was with her. And that the room was bright so he would definitely have seen it if it was there. So there’s no evidence it was there at the time. ‘He said/she said. ‘
The mate said there was one bruise on her arm and she was worried how her boyfriend would react when he saw it. So that’s where the defence re the bruising comes in. (Although I find him the least believable of the 4 main characters). I think a big negative for her case is all 3 others involved said that at the end it was the plaintiff who wanted to stay and party on
I believe that the plaintiff fully believes everything she is saying is the truth and that McGregor is capable of it. But she was very drunk and can’t remember most of what happened that day, so maybe she is mis-remembering. Not sure how I’d vote if I was on the jury. Maybe his notoriety may count against him
It wasn't inserted it was wedged into the top of her cervix
I thought it was said his semen/dna was at the tampon area which had to be removed from her cervix with forceps.
He is a meal ticket
A golden goose
Imagine all the young wans out there which hitch themselves to some scummer
None of them strike gold
Well there is question on the various forms when trying to enter the US about drug use. So yea technically he shouldn't be allowed in.
Maybe it wasnt inserted when they had sex.
I don’t know a single woman that would have sex with a tampon inserted, I’d hope this is a key piece of information that will help her case.
I dont think this is a men v women point of view. it is a young v old point of view. People my parents age would think if you go to a guys hotel you are clearly after sex but they are from a different era and more old fashioned, I wouldnt see things the same at all or most people my age, thankfully. you can often end up in a hotel room, air b&b, college house etc with members of the opposite sex but that doesnt mean anything, you may end up in bed together or you may not even have a kiss. it is victim blaming to say otherwise.
He is clearly having sex with other women without using condoms, putting dee at risk of stds, skummy behavior to say the least and she is a doormat to put up with it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/d38dadd4e9049f636f3a15f844846484.svg)