Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Talk

1130132134135136

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭pad406


    No doubt it's a nice little earner! But as other manufactures ramp up EV production it will diminish and can't be relied on long term. 43% is an awful lot of eggs in one basket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭JOL1


    You are right that as others ramp it will not be as sought after …but there are a lot of ICE cars being manufactured and pace of shift to EV alone has slowed with other manufacturer and this revenue is growing for now. More eggs will go into the basket



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    I only spotted this today. Musk has said that there is a possibility that HW3 will not be good enough for unsupervised FSD (that's level 5 autonomous driving that doesn't need a driver or a steering wheel)

    If that is the case, Tesla will upgrade HW3 cars with FSD for free

    Let's hope it is not good enough so! 😊 My car originally had HW2.5 but was upgraded by the previous owner to HW3 (for free). Recently I got upgraded to the newest gen cameras (for free)

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 302 ✭✭pad406


    Very true, none of his eggs are disappearing tomorrow or the next day :)

    What I haven't been able to see is how big is his chicken coop? How many credits do they have to sell, are they selling 10%, 50%, 90%. Be interesting to find out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭JOL1


    I cant be sure how much of their total available are sold, I suspect its also a demand led dynamic depending on who wants/needs to purchase. There is commercial sensitivity about who buys.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭felonious_Gru


    To the Tesla model Y owners here , what kind of service did you do and at what mileage?

    Bought a Y in March 2023 and have thirty thousand km on clock, haven't done any kind of service bar replacement of two tyres , would air filter need replacing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,816 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Won't need to do anything servicey until next year.

    https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_eu/GUID-E95DAAD9-646E-4249-9930-B109ED7B1D91.html



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    every 2 years I’d change the cabin filter.
    every 2 years is clean the brakes. That involves removing the pads and wire brushing the calipers, pads and greasing relevant parts. Very DIY.

    Obviously keep an eye on suspension and wearing parts such as bushings etc

    You can change the air con gas every few years just as any other car. Same for brake fluid.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    There's been a few YT posts about this for a while, there are also doubts on the brand spanking new hardware not being up to the job, last few weeks I've started getting the cameras blocked messages and that takes assisted parking and FSD off the page

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Musk has pretty much given his word that if any of the hardware is inadequate for unsupervised FSD (level 5 autonomous driving demonstrably safer than humans), then he will upgrade it for free to hardware that can. Obviously only for cars where the owner or previous owner has purchased FSD for

    Obviously we are only at a beta version of supervised FSD now, and only in north America. The software in use in your car or mine at the moment has nothing in common with the software used for that

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    We can trust him 😉

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,413 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The reality is he's not trustworthy nor is his word. You'd be gullible to take what he says with any sort of conviction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    The HW3 thing was a clear promise. He would be in a lot of trouble if he reneged on that. Possibly even legally. I doubt that will happen.

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,413 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Promises are meaningless unless followed paper. You've as much access to the ramblings of the man as I do. He's a known liar.

    I wouldn't take any promises he makes on twitter or elsewhere related to giveaways for his vehicles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    I don't take it all as seriously. FSD didn't cost me a cent. But there are thousands of very patient "believers" out there who paid the full whack for it - some many years back. If Musk would renege on above promise, you can bet this patience would run out very quickly and a class action suit would follow

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,413 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    And they still don't have fsd.

    But sure look here we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 584 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    I would undoubtedly place you in the category of Musk/Tesla/FSD "believers" despite how frequently you mention you brought Tesla to court many times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Oh I believe Tesla will have self driving cars soon enough alright. In fact they already do (beta software) and the progress in the last year has been astonishing. But I am not such a believer that I would fork out €7,500 for FSD on my car. I was looking for it on a car alright, but it didn't cost me any extra. With a bit of luck the FSD beta will come to Europe next year, maybe even to RHD countries

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Promises don't fix blocked cameras due to humid Ireland, per recall 2024_23366 if a pillar door camera is obstructed or blinded then no FSD will be available (and maybe not AP or assisted parking). My car has HW 4 and both AP and Assisted Parking are unavailable at times due to blocked cameras (99% of the time humidity related). Car will be fine during the Summer but for the next 6months the message will be daily.

    Another HD upgrade will be required with heated cameras

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Sounds like a case of hardware developed and tested in sunny dry California / Texas with no consideration for poor climates. A retrofit of heated cameras all around sounds like a good idea. And not expensive either.

    According to ChatGPT, the Tesla Model S cameras are heated already. That's possibly the reason I got the recent free upgrade:

    image.png

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,184 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I still stand by my earlier comments that full on level 5 FSD (where insurance is from the OEM and not a liability placed on the occupants of the car) is not possible without radar and lidar.

    V3,V4,V5 whatever will not be able to offer the above, so I would still stand by the assertion that HW4 like HW3 before it will not be able to offer level 5 autonomy FSD.

    If you watch the US based videos of FSD (which I do on occasion) it is doing quite well but I wouldn't trust it without a driver, let alone without a wheel. If you look at waymo self driving cars, they are levels above FSD and even they are not fully ready (still in beta mode, geo locked). More importantly, if you look at tesla fan youtubers like Kim Java in the US who also have used the waymo cars, they generally are of the same opinion that I expressed, the waymo cars are head and shoulders above Tesla. Tesla FSD is a great driver aid, but it is neither Full, nor Self, nor Driving. Ironically, it is akin to the original autopilot - the airplane one - in that it can do most boring things itself but it can never fly a plane on its own without a pilot or a wheel.

    If I were a betting man, I'd bet that a non Tesla company will be first to mass market of a car that actually offers FSD. OEMs on both sides of the pond - GM in the US and Mercedes in Germany - are closer than Tesla are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Quoted for the future, I'd say you will be proven wrong on pretty much all counts. Humans do not need lidar and radar either to drive pretty safely.

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,184 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Humans have more senses than just vision. You don't drive with your other senses disengaged. Happy to be quoted for posterity of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,413 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    There isnt a government or insurer on earth that would allow vision only vehicles out loose on the roads. Youve been given ample reasons why even from a basic hardware limitations this wont happen but ignore the basics everytime,

    At absolutely BEST situation Tesla will get some level of clearance for specific limited cities / streets US only and the vehicles will be under tesla insurance.

    That aint FSD, its basically Trams in 2024 with a tad more freedom.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,184 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I can't see them even getting to what Waymo already have.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,267 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    You're repeating this again, the regulations from UNECE are all about functional domain design and do not regulate based on the technology in use. If vision only can meet the operational domain requirements, then it will be allowed, if it can't it won't. The regulators so far have not shown any sign of regulating on choice of technology.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,413 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    your assertion keeps on being that video processing is an acceptable baseline for moving vehicles in the public domain. Its a laughable notion. Im repeating it because its laughable, and frankly to continued themed push for 8 years on this subject is driven solely by investors and not insurance or regulational acceptance.

    Video cant pass muster and wont.

    As mentioned above Waymo is further ahead on these capabilties.

    I get amused each time you target me for pointing out the limitations of the hardware in what is vastly more sensory environment. Id be equally amused that you assume even if this stuff got past some elon heavy US State, that it would get beyond EU regulation. (hilarious at this point),



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,733 ✭✭✭maidhc


    You are not doing yourself any favours in this particular argument. There is no good reason not to use all the technology to make a vehicle safer. To do otherwise is going down the morally ambiguous Ford Pinto route. Humans are only ok when it comes to driving safely, cameras are generally rubbish even for basic tasks and ai is years (maybe never) away from coming close to having real reasoning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66,721 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Au contraire! The error in your logic is that using all technology makes things safer. This is not the case. Use more sensors than one and you will get conflicting reports from them.

    The comparison with the Pinto is preposterous. That was about not keeping a fatal flaw in the design secret as to just pay out for victims burnt to death was cheaper than a recall.

    My ads on adverts.ie:

    Victron stuff for sale, Multiplus-II, Quattro!

    https://www.adverts.ie/member/5856/ads



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,267 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    No my assertion is that your theory that regulators will suddenly switch from their technology agnostic regulation to a regulatory regime that is based on the technology used rather than the functional domain the technology operates in has no basis in fact.

    Do you have any evidence at all that regulators are planning to switch? You've not been able to do so previously, I assume by bringing it up again you've now found some evidence that the regulators are changing their approach.

    The fact you mention the EU, when it's UNECE that's in charge of the vehicle safety regulation makes me think it's not something you have much knowledge of.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement