Sure he's said that if Ivanka wasn't his daughter, he'd be dating her. What an absolute creep.
its all out now - stormy owes trump 660,000 dollars in legal fees from failed defamation case (plus appeals) plus 10% annual interest plus 3 court orders ordering her to pay .. a super credible witness lol
“I will go to jail before I pay a penny,” she tweeted
https://x.com/StormyDaniels/status/1590539124272173057
What did she say that isn't true?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt31169602/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
I'm aware of only one documentary called Stormy about a porn actress called Stormy Daniels.
you can ask the california court that, the fact is there are 3 court orders that she has to pay trump over half a million dollars plus 10% annual interest - she is not a credible witness
Someone has been watching "Lie to me".
... and someone who has six businesses go bankrupt leaving creditors unpaid and who has given different valuations for their properties to revenue and the banks is a credible witness?
Trump lies constantly, why didn’t he go to Barrons graduation?
I asked you.
Can you answer?
How much will Donald owe, if the house of cards called Trump Inc., comes under pressure due to bond/cash requests, the main mortgage owners will scramble for the door and it's every man for himself as the look for lifeboats.
It's not on yet. He's booked as a keynote speaker at some event in a different State that evening, as I think recent polls seem to indicate it could be closer than expected. Theoretically, he could still have enough time to attend both, or at least the start of the graduation, but yeah it wouldn't be surprising if he doesn't attend the graduation now.
Gollf tomorrow at Bedminster, it's his day off.
Why isn't she a credible witness?
You are deflecting to the court - apparently you have no idea what it's about, but are claiming she is not credible. This seems to rather render you patently uncredible.
Luckily the case doesn't rely solely on her. We have plenty of other evidence. Trump no longer, after denying it, claims she is lying about the sex. He isn't, again after repeatedly lying about it, even claiming a payment wasn't made.
He isn't even claiming, again after repeatedly lying about it, that she wasn't paid off in order to keep it quiet.
So regardless of your own opinion of SD, the facts are that Trump slept with a porn star while his wife was recovering after recently giving birth to his child, and then he used his financial power to try to hide the truth. Lying repeatedly to save his own skin. And you think that makes him credible. Not just as a witness in a case. Credible as a man.
As it happens today, I was listening to a podcast on fake forensic "sciences". Not finished it yet so I'm not sure which one will win the prize for most bullshit. I do remember Lie to Me though, it was one of the first things that came to mind.
He hasn't not yet, it's on the 17th. Barron is graduating brunch time down in Florida while Trump will be attending a fundraiser in Minnesota that evening. It's unclear that he won't attend both events yet.
His hand picked Judge does it again
Would love to see Smith take the option to get this case out of her hands, clearly it's too much for her to wrap her head around. Let's see how it plays out. I don't think a judge he appointed indefinitely delaying a cut and dry case even legal experts on the right say he is "dead to rights" on is going to do much, if not the opposite, to sway independents and moderates to vote for him, and we already know the MAGA base is smaller than the base of never Trumpers.
As pointed out here...
I don't think it's of value at appeal.
The core of this case is that Trump was desperate to keep this out of the news before the election.
The fact that it wasn't just "Man was unfaithful 10 years ago" (in 2016) but in fact, it is a story about sexual coercion and other weird and unsettling behaviour, like saying the woman he was about to have sex with " reminds him of his daughter" makes his determination to keep this hidden from Voters all the more believable.
MERCHAN: I understand that your client is upset at this point, but he is cursing audibly, and he is shaking his head visually and that’s contemptuous. It has the potential to intimidate the witness and the jury can see that.
BLANCHE: I will talk to him.
MERCHAN: So, I am speaking to you here at the bench because I don’t want to embarrass him.
MERCHAN: You need to speak to him. I won’t tolerate that.
MERCHAN: One time I noticed when Ms. Daniels was testifying about rolling up the magazine, and presumably smacking your client, and after that point he shook his head and he looked down. https://www.mediaite.com/crime/judge-tells-trumps-attorneys-to-control-their-client-he-is-cursing-audibly/
Am I getting this right, porn star I.e person that has sex with people for money ,has sex with person, and then after not getting a movie deal after threatening to reveal that person, threatens that person, he pays her to not reveal, and she reveals anyway to make more fame and money,am I getting this right .
No I don't think you do. For starters a porn star isn't a prostitute, they are paid to simulate or perform sex, alone or with other paid actors, for movie productions, she was pressured into sex because of an imbalanced power dynamic, and I don't know where you get that she threatened him: where are the assault charges? And he wanted to keep it secret to get more fame and money and power.
Porn stars get paid for having sex with people on camera for money ,nobody forced her to have sex with Trump, she's a grown woman, who being a porn star, would be the most wise in the business, she tried to sue him before for deformation and now she owes 600.000 Dollars, which she has not paid, no sympathy here ,she's just another gold digger, I doubt there's many high range politicians in this world that haven't paid a brass, sorry if the truth hurts
So Trump is within his rights to buy her off so that she does not ,(just before the election and right after the Access Hollywood tapes ) tell the public and to do so in such a way that he falsifies his business accounts by putting through the payments as "legal fees"?
And because Stormy Daniels is in your eyes something of an accomplice and nothing like a victim then Trump is less criminally liable for his actions than he would be otherwise?
This trial is about Stormy Daniels rather than Trump,perhaps.
....
Whether you have sympathy for her or not is entirely irrelevant.
She is giving evidence that he had sex with her and then tried to silence her.
You seem to accept that as true.
these aren’t truths just your opinion. And she never sued him for “deformation.” Truths lolol
That’s surprising Nikki Haley got a quarter of the primary vote since I haven’t even seen her name in the papers in weeks.
In the interest of keeping the thread on topic lets just ignore a certain "am I getting this right" individual.
If her name is on the ticket its valid and people when voting could be looking at her name versus a certain other name when it comes to crunch time and going "hmm, how bad could she be..?"
