We've seen Zelensky near the battles, at least one visit to Bakmut (which was madness frankly), and he arrived in Kherson not many hours after the Russian departure. Where's your man Putin been in comparison? Nowhere near anything like that.
Zelensky looks like crap, and I'm at all surprise by that. With the amount of stress he's been under this year, I'll be surprised if he'll retain any hair by the end of this, if the blood-pressure doesn't kill him first. This is a guy who seriously needs a holiday, which he and all of Ukraine will hopefully get a chance to do upon Russia being defeated.
Do you really need to ask this question?
It's quite obvious the orc propaganda is being pushed by the putler regime.
Note the part too: the weapon that may prove most decisive in the country’s fight against Russia’s invasion is the humble 155-milimeter artillery shell It shows all this talk by Russians of wonder weapons and the like, is just that, talk. What Russia has/had are huge stockpiles of dumb shells and those are what has helped them take what they have taken. It'll also be what lagely decides the outcome. Though modern non Soviet type battle tanks in numbers would be extremely helfpul, if not decisive. Still "old school" but far better than anything Russia can field. The problem is numbers.
The difference between the orcs and brave Ukrainians, these people are willing to fight for what is right.
Zelensky's a coke fiend!! is the Russian version of the pro Ukrainian putin's's dying of hair faulure/is dead already and has been replaced by a mute Siberian called Yuri. Long running and daft and trotted out all too regularly. So not a shock to see it again. I missed it. 😁
What exactly should the gardai be looking for, and under what grounds?
You've raised a pertinent issue there
Life is absolutely insignificant to Putin, compared to the grabbing of land
If you let a dog steal a piece of your chicken he will come back when he is hungry again for more. If you kick him hard in the anus he will stay away
Just post the links to back up the many claims in the short number of posts you've put up, we can then discuss them in a civilised manner.
Always the same
Predictable, monotonous, fragile
Obviously highly impressionable too
Wow... Just...Wow.....
I didn't know Australia was in Nato....oh, it's not. Well so much for that angle, I guess you'll have to try another. How about Nazis, we haven't had that one yet.
The wagner bot farm (troll farm) in St.Petersberg has seemingly come online in a big way recently with intelligence and equipment from China.
Edit: Of course it shuts down concourse from any genuine ordinary joe soap russian when you've computers in a factory in St.Petersberg flooding social media.
..
Russia has stunned NATO with the amount of missiles it has used in the war, many years of westers MIC manufacturing capacity launched month after month with no let up.
NATO has been far more "stunned" by the amount of artillery shells involved. Though it has long been known Russia as part of her military doctrine held huge stockpiles of same. They still operate the quantity has a quality of its own doctrine.
Hypersonic missiles are more of a "wunderwaffe" and like those in WW2 were either too small in number or not nearly so effective in reality that their effectiveness is far more as a propaganda tool and I have found Russians and their supporters do talk a lot about such weaopns. The latest I've heard directly is Russia has only used their outdated kit and just you wait and see. Plus talk of "secret cities" in Russia developing and storing all these wonder weapons.
Put it another way; how many has Russia used in this war? What they have used were air launched glide types and only a tiny handful and even here confirmation is dubious. There were videos of these in action, but the fact there were proves the vids were of non hypersonic missiles. You're not getting an iphone vid of anything motoring at Mach 10. Their hypersonic cruise types are not close to being in service. They've had to go to Iran for missile supply which doesn't sound like a nation of advanced missiles.
What does NATO, or more specifically America have? Hard to say. They were open about hypersonic systems both manned and unmanned, but went quiet about it, nigh on overnight. Though one project got nearly a billlion dollars allocated a few years ago.
They've done this sort of thing before. Stealth being the obvious one. Much scuttlebutt about it in the 70's, then silencio, until F-117's and B-2's got wheeled out. Ironically much of the stealth theory was Russian, but they didn't or couldn't develop it, or just didn't see the utility/cost benefit. The US generally has so much spare cash down the back of the sofa and an extensive and well dug in "black project" setup to allow for more oddball stuff.
Put it another way; when The Beatles were breaking America in black and white on the Ed Sullivan show the yanks put this in the air on the quiet. They even had a drone of the type.
It's actually Russia's "dumb" old style artillery that's the bigger headache by far. This war is an old style and horrific slugfest on the ground. Beyond propaganda wunderwaffe are generally only of any use when they're no longer a wunder and it's often the case other platforms take over. EG the SR71 above was later essentially sidestepped by spy satellites and its role became much narrower. Stealth is kinda similar. The stealthiest stealth platforms are not as popular these days, instead pretty stealthy, or stealthy enough is the way of things.
Oh and BTW ICBM's are hypersonic. It's how they work and America and others have plenty of them. If Russia were hitting western European/NATO cities we're in full on WW3 and all bets are off and game over for the northern hemisphere, but one thing is sure Russia would also be a cratered graveyard of radioactive corpses.
These grunts should have their IQ's tattooed on their foreheads
Forget being woke
Lack of empathy is tantamount to stupidity, denseness, dullness, impeded cognitive agility, etc.
These people never managed to drag their carcasses off the baseline of awareness
Have they mentioned what aircraft?
Royal airforce only fly F35's and Eurofighters.
Tornados were retired.
Planning for the future
They sleep very well because the "intelligent/empathic" area of their brain never evolved.
No that's not what you claimed
"I'll explain so you can understand, NATO troops are on the ground,
Very silly of you to play that game.
I'd rather be a "safe women and children bot" than a "murdering Russian bot"
Your comment is very revealing though.
How do you sleep at night supporting murdering rapists?
Noticed it happens more when Russian forces make gains e.g. previously in LNR/DNR and now that they are creeping forward in Bahkmut. Must make a bingo card for this.
These f16's will be a total game changer for Ukraine. Imagine having strike capability anywhere over orc occupied territory?
Possibly.
I always think that in relation to ATACMS that the US should 'deny' them the missile but secretly give some to Ukraine, where they are used to target key ammo dumps and command centres behind the lines, in one fell swoop.
Can you imagine the damage they can do to Russian morale and logistics if they can be unleashed in such force in a 24-48 hour period.
The Gardai should be looking at some of the activity in places here and the likes of Mick/Daly and all the others who are promoting orc propaganda.
Who are these people who is funding them. These are all reasonable questions that need answering.
Opinions and indeed propaganda of any stripe are only effective in echo chambers. If they're talking nonsense the echo chamber will agree with it. It has to or it'll be removed. It's only when they're exposed to wider debate does their position become challenged and some sort of reality established, which in turn informs the wider debate. It's precisely why I consider current Russia a busted flush. It allows little or no debate that goes off script and prefers, even insists on official fanstasies to bolster its worldview.
Sadly even the interwebs has gone this way and why IMHO platforms like forums where you can't avoid "other opinions" have died off, to be replaced by platforms that allow upvotes, ignores or blocks to stop challenges to the narrative, personal or societal. But I digress...
Ah now Russia is breaking out the soviet rreserves to bomb apartments blocks including anti carrier weapons. Russian missiles are severely depleted.
Russian losses already mounting hugely before their new offensive even begins officially.
All commentators I've seen have poured cold water over their ability to use their 500,000 newly mobilised troops be make a decisive impact on the war. They may well capture some territory, but to think they can do something that they weren't able to do last year doesn't make sense, given that most of their experienced soldiers have been killed or wounded and they are suffering shortages in supplies in ammo, shells and other gear.
The last thrown of the dice from Putin and his regime, because what else can he do if and when this new offensive fails? Call up another 500,000 men and give it another go?