Russian sentiment re their war on Ukraine, 'Why can't Ukrainians get on with us killing and raping them, with us stealing their kids and not resist. It'd be so simple, and it's really bad form from them to make this difficult for us. And HOW VERY DARE THEY attack our lovely bridge into Crimea, they KNOW this is how we get to our holiday destination - clearly a denial of our human rights. We'll just have to shell their city centres to learn them, but they very much brought this on themselves.'
Human rights are for humans, which russians are not.
That looks like an oil refinery judging by the structures involved and black smoke.
"That? It's nothing...it's just where I rested my knob on the table."
"Sure thing, boss..."
How'd that work out for Sean Connery's character?🙃
Spitting at secret service. See you in a couple years, tovarischka (or however you say it.)
I see you're still going, want to throw up some links to back all this scutter up?
They'll be fun to read.
A lot of them seem to be infected with the right wing Russian nationalism virus. The years of brainwashing by Putin have paid off - they genuinely believe they are a global superpower and destined to 'rule' the entirety of eastern Europe.
The mass of contradictions with them is that they can't comprehend that Russia is little more than a third world country with a failing military.
Plus plus...
Ukraine corrupt (no corruption to see here)
Ukraine nazis (no nazis in Russia, Wagner is just a good composer)
No NATO on our borders (hi Kalingrad & ps Finland is calling)
Watching the clips from Olga Skabeyeva's show this morning, I was expecting some kind of sadistic jubilation at yesterday's strikes, and while the speakers talked it up for all its worth, I detected a real sense of misery among them, as if they were finally running out of things to sell to the Russian people...
So Russia are trying to make it look like the attacks on civilian infrastructure is Ukraine is Ukraines fault now,incredible.
I cant believe how stupid and desperate they are
''There's none so blind as those who do not wish to see.''
Why not do your own impartial investigations into the matter, that is if you can handle the truth. It is never a good practice to shoot the messenger, but if the messenger is wrong lead him to the path of righteousness.
They are miserable because they know if the public turns against the NovoFuhrer they will bear a fair brunt of the anger as the "voices of Sauron"...
It does suggest some unease at what is going on. They must surely be aware that burning buildings and cars in the middle of a capital city in the daytime is not a particularly good look - it looked more like the aftermath of an attack by ISIS.....definitely not an attack against a military target.
Have you got a link please?
In the space of ten posts you've gone from "poor Ukrainians are being bombed and some of you talk like this is a game of Call of Duty" (fair point)
to
"NATO forces are every bit as evil as Russian forces", which is palpable nonsense.
It's almost like you're trying to slip your real agenda in under the guise of pretend humanitarianism.
...
Do you have any links/proof re: evil nato forces?
Looks like Russia is attacking utilities and energy infrastructure again today, likely trying to make life miserable for the ordinary citizen:-
As we already know, legitimate military targets my b****x.
"One missile hit a rock on the island", bet they showed that rock.
I thought you meant a different video. I'd seen that, but I don't see any hint of doubt or contrition there. The speaker said he wanted more such attacks.
If you mean the expressions on the other people in the video, they always have that expression on their face from the start of the war. I take that as a, 'I'll put on a performance when I'm speaking my own BS, but I wont bother when someone else is spouting their BS'.
EDIT - this is what I was thinking about - Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)
You make the claims, you back them up.
For some reason you seem unable to, I wonder why?
No doubt there's a vast amount of "evidence" available on Russian sponsored state media and TV (or maybe closer to home here in the conspiracy thread).
No that's not whataboutery, that's called 'both-siding', something which the moderators also pay attention to I believe.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/bothsidesing-bothsidesism-new-words-were-watching
Complete nonsense. It is not clear who the house was rented to but it is clear it was rented by an agent. It is not even clear from the reporting that they were even Russians, just people were witnessed speaking Russian
It appears that the rental company looking after Mr Zelensky’s property did not realise that the guest was from Russia as “no rental contracts have been signed with citizens of the Russian Federation,”
The villa did not surrender to the Russians because we have a warrant from the owner who categorically forbids us from doing so. We can hand over to someone so that they are of a different nationality: Europeans, Americans, and so on, - said Claudio Salvini
It is your own choice to continue on an idiotic path however. You can believe that Zelensky spent his summer personally overseeing the rental of the property if you choose and not that someone with an address in England rented a property in Italy from an agent in Italy
As we're talking about the Russian videos, note they'll throw in phrases like, 'This is obvious' - I wonder if this is a version of cognitive behavioural manipulation (may not be the correct term) - a verbal cue to manipulate the listeners thoughts.
Methinks you're some furriner if you don't understand the concept of whataboutery, something you're peddling here in the last day.
There are no atheists in foxholes. (Viewer discretion is advised)
Yes, these shows feel less like discussions and more like policy lectures - the speakers rarely pause for breath or elaborate on points they make. But I read somewhere that Russians had by the end of summer grown thoroughly fed up of the wall to wall political programming and wanted Gogglebox (or whatever they watch on a Saturday night with their bag of chips) on.
NATO is not an angelic organisation, but they do not deliberately target civilians over and over again as Russia does then celebrate it on their national TV channels. They do not deliberately drop bombs on theatres and train stations where hundreds of women and children are known to be sheltering. They do not take old men and teenage boys, tie their hands behind their back, shoot them and dump them in mass graves. They do not bomb temporary prisons holding enemy combatants. They do not deliberately target schools, hospitals and residential areas. They do not completely destroy entire cities that refuse to surrender to them, in the process murdering thousands of civilians.
Russia does all these things. And then is cowardly and spineless and cynical enough to deny it.
That's the difference.
See the guy at 40s jumping into a blast hole, based on the corollary of the the Lightning never strikes twice in the same place being applied to a shell never lands in the same place twice.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e050b53be62f0ae2404c620976170938.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eedacf599b4135dfd56d6fdbddcbd867.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c635d680d76ce16e490d61f21d7a1353.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5117ec177439400b1e5944f4d30acdda.svg)