Just bear this in mind if you are thinking of lending them your vote at the next election. Their guy going around putting up Mary-Lou posters has 23 previous criminal convictions.
Plenty of other parties to vote for if you want to vote against the government.
https://www.independent.ie/news/sinn-fein-election-worker-jailed-for-robbing-chronically-ill-pension
Was probably putting up the posters without the knowledge or permission of the party or Mary Lou.
He's only putting up posters.... Scumbag yes, running for the election, no.
I'm not a shinner, but if you really think this is going to change the mind of anyone, well I have some magic beans to sell you.
Anyway, isn't Leo currently under investigation too?
What does his support for SF have to do with his crimes?
I’m sure there are criminals, murderers, etc., who support other parties, but that doesn’t make a catchy thread title.
Just because a scumbag supports SF doesn’t mean SF supports him.
Won't change the minds of the criminal or welfare classes but might very well change the mind of that nurse of primary school teacher voting for them due to housing.
Unlikely. Those people will be too intelligent to fall for whatever it is you are trying here.
I'd say people with housing issues have made up their mind who they are not voting for already.
Ah yes, the old political trick of mud slinging... Stones and glass houses and all that craic. Here's a good one...
Link in OP no longer valid. It has been replaced with this commentary
bit of a stretch here, plenty of reasons not to want a thing to do with the shinners without this kind of stuff tbh
That article, and the defendant’s account of events, is the funniest thing I have read in a long time.
A criminal mastermind for sure
He just might be the next minister for justice.
"A Sinn Féin spokesperson said: “This was a despicable crime and we welcome that this individual has been convicted.”"
Don't think they can say anything else. It's the Indo that's making it an SF headline when it's really one about a criminal - and I suspect all parties have supporters who commit criminal offences. Yes he was acting for the party at the time, but it's really a story about a criminal act and not a political party
Considering he has 23 previous convictions the amazing thing is that he only received a 9 month sentence.
Is it any wonder that crime is so prevalent.
Sick robbing arseholes like him are sticking two fingers up at the pathetic justice system.
I’m surprised he still has his kneecaps intact.
Is he a "good republican"?
Seeing a false equivalency, like this, makes me less likely to vote for the other main parties to be honest. It immediately reminds me of all the criminal acts their elected politicians have gotten up to and which their supporters can, so easily, brush under the carpet.
None of the crimes were terrorism related or for the financial benefit of SF so probably not.
There is a big difference between an article about, say, a man who used to work as a security guard in McDonalds back in the day who was later done for punching a randomer, and a story about a security guard in McDonalds who was done for punching a randomer while working for McDonalds.
The accused's criminal record had previous 10 convictions under the Road Traffic Act, one for assault, three public order offences, four drugs charges, and possessing a weapon, failing to appear in court and criminal damage.
If those are the people being sent around by any organisation to do any work that involves interaction with the public, people are entitled to ask questions.
If he was acting in the course of employment when he did what he did, the employer would be vicariously liable. I would say that, if the issue was pushed, the party could also be vicariously liable here.
In addition, the article says he was hanging the posters with another man ......... the other man apparently wasn't arsed enough at seeing his buddy attack a man more than double his age (34 v 78) to try to stop him.
Well the false equivalence would be pretending that other parties "cover up".
Haughey for example was a thieving gangster. I doubt - although I could be wrong - that you will find FF heads who will swear blind to you that he was innocent (even though I don't think that he was ever convicted). If you mention Haughey, I don't think the FF heads will go into victim persecution mode like you'll see whenever a SF person is mentioned, or the reflex "whaddabout" reaction
What party was your man Lowry in before they kicked him out that time? Wasn't he up to no good as well? Was he FG maybe?
Meh... ffg are thieving billions from us every month...
Link doesn't work??
So I take it you agree with the SF election worker's actions?
It might be a step to far for you to admit that it might have been even a little out of line.
See post #11
He was actively working for the party when he committed these crimes , its laughable to suggest that its not relevant
his past crimes ? well who knows one of them is for possession of a weapon apparently, thats about as sf as you can get crime wise right ?
yes there are criminals in other party's but the amount of murderers and bombers fraudsters smugglers and assorted thugs that have sf links is a real and valid cause for concern
obviously sf like to use their terrorists work for them at election time ,
Dublin SF link to planned IRA raid - Independent.ie
So if I commit a crime does that mean the company I’m currently working for endorses me and my crime?
if your injure some one while working for a company then yes the company would be liable
tbh the fact that you are still arguing the point is a disturbing glimpse into a fanatical brainwashed mind or a professional political poster .
I didnt check but did you post that " Im not a sf supporter but line yet ?
Even if it wasn’t done on company time?
Even if it was, the company could hardly be held liable. By that logic any crime I commit on company time would be the liability of the company, including crimes I commit against the company itself.
When I was down home at my folks place before the last GE I saw that some of the local "hard men" were handing out fliers on behalf of SF. Maybe that seed of populist nationalism was always there with them, but some of these lads were the sort who would have been the go-to if looking for a 10-spot of hash, or the type to avoid if not looking for a random beating outside the chipper about 20 years back.
Not a Valley of the Squinting Windows sort at all, but there is an element amongst SF activists that needs to be looked at in more detail.
Come on, give him a break. He fell or a ladder for all we know.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1a8522b26abe4367117071263a70671.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5dc0c82bb5d5c9e7a358d7971a18240f.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/v2/0c95fbacfd3f8db330cceee65321bca3.svg)