A handy analysis by the author and a tweet from George Conway interpreting what Mazar's letter said: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/february-14-2022
Excerpt (Conway's tweet quoting Mazar's letter):
“‘decision regarding the financial…statements’=they are false because you lied
‘totality of the circumstances’=the D.A. is serious
‘non-waivable conflict of interest’=we are now on team D.A.
‘not able to provide new work product’=sorry we’re not going to jail for you”
In addition. Conway's tweeted that Mazar's has probably turned over more than .5 million documents to the AG: https://twitter.com/gtconway3d/status/1493371637600858112
DNS traffic records are not confidential. There was no infiltration or spying. But easy for Fox to deliberately manipulate tech illiterate Americans. How are you falling for this rubbish?
White house servers are most certainly confidential.. You don't think traffic in the white house goes out over a public WAN do you ? lol
Was he in the White House?
Please highlight the section in Durham's filing where he states white house servers were hacked?
Yes. The Durham report alleges Trumps computers were spied on twice- Trump tower and The White House. It is a criminal offence to monitor traffic on a priviate network.
Trump used his private personal phone frequently and refused to get his 'armoured' government issued device, how 'Internet safe' do you think he is?
“Alleges”
After a 3 year investigation.
Those are an interesting couple of points there, one that the information Sussman supplied was correct so who cares and the second the Danchenko information again was correct, so who cares. Wasn’t Nixon just trying to steal real information from the DNC too?
The fact that a rumour overheard by one person sometime drunkenly a party can became headline news for years should really cause one to ask questions. Or that the Steele dossier that rumour originated from was funded by the DNC. The process of verifying information went out the window.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/steele-dossier-analyst-arrested-igor-danchenko-1253151/
Here's a relevant quote from the NY times article debunking all the noise from the GQP and the clapping seals here:
The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.
Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.
“What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, both lawyers for Mr. Dagon. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”
Further:
In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.
After Russians hacked networks for the White House and Democrats in 2015 and 2016, it went on, the cybersecurity researchers were “deeply concerned” to find data suggesting Russian-made YotaPhones were in proximity to the Trump campaign and the White House, so “prepared a report of their findings, which was subsequently shared with the C.I.A.”
A spokesman for Mr. Durham declined to comment.
66% of Democrats think Hillary should be questioned over Russia allegations up 22% source: A+ rated pollsters TIPP.
These new allegations of espionage against Trump will ruin her chances of a 2024 run and shows just how dysfunctional the Democrats are right now. This is a great bit of news for Donald and republicans going in to midterms and beyond.
What report? When was it published? Please post the link.
Half to laugh at the efforts to ignore what is going on with Trump and to try to spin about someone who hasn't been in politics in 6 years.
Real eyes closed, fingers in ears type stuff.
Moved on from Durham, have you?
And all they have are claims and allegations. It's embarrassing.
The funny thing about all this is that there was never any need for anyone to work "undercover" to link Trump to Russia. Trump was openly inviting Russian interference in the 2016 election ("Russia, if you're listening). The FBI would've been neglecting its duties to protect the US if it hadn't been keeping an eye on what was going on there. It's quite hilarious that after everything Trump has done and said, people are STILL harping on about Hillary Clinton and 2016. Truly and utterly pathetic.
Are you more connected than the rest of us on US politics as you are claiming it will ruin her chances of running in 2024 when afaik there has been 0 indication or even chatter of her running.
There has been talk of her running. None of it from her though and all from Fox and other outlets even further right.
Tucker Carlson had a rant about it recently. Some of their other anchors have been wailing about it too. It's as if they are struggling for a boogeyman to distract from their Messiah 🤷♂️
What’s the source for that? For all we know you made that in MS paint. It looks like it.
I think MSPaint would have been a better source, it's the New York Post:
Most Democrats want Hillary Clinton investigated for any role in Russiagate scandal: poll (nypost.com)
The 66% is also from a subset of Democrats:
That includes two-thirds — or 66 percent — of the Democrats polled who said they have been keeping up with the case.
Hilary derangement syndrome > trump derangement syndrome
Ah apologies I didn’t realise it was coming from the mouth of the bastion of truth and the media group of total transparency. Thanks for setting me straight.
It's as if they are struggling for a boogeyman to distract from their Messiah
Pretty sure this belongs in the Biden thread. 🤣. Trump is still getting more posts than him!
Accuse others of what you are yourself accused of as they say or something like that.
Do you find it surprising that a thread about a corrupt, unhinged traitor would get more attention than one about a guy quietly going about his job?
Cause that's what matters, eh?
Juvenile stuff.
Sooooo, source for that graph? Is it trustworthy or have you swallowed it whole because it tells you what you want to hear ?
That’s not a good thing.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/86b2bf519a78c14958c9040117dc4dc1.svg)
