The BBC has shown that this ghastly place was overrun and liberated on January 27th 1945.
Where did I day that?
He's talking about the 1946 investigation, they said they found no mass graves.
And anything not found yet in 1946 clearly does not exist, right?
My bad, that was another clown.
I believe the author stated the reason for that was the 1946 investigations lasted only a few days
Or is it you're implying that subsequent investigations which identified mass graves are wrong?
I'm only aware of the one investigation in recent decades, were there more than one?
Rather than engage in continued pedantism with regard to the referenced investigations in 1946 and 2010 - ie referring to the range of methodologies / discoveries made. Perhaps you would answer my question first. Thanks
So again
Are you implying that subsequent investigations which identified mass graves are wrong?
No.
I'm just wondering how the 46 investigation could have missed mass graves?
Was there more than one 'subsequent investigation'?
No what?
You've forgotten your question already?
The question quite clearly was "No" what?
So you can't even put the word "no" into a sentence. Well there's a surprise
Not even the new Camp Commandent of Treblinka Franz Stangl, when interviewed denied the existence of Treblinka as a death camp or the mass graves there
"...I first saw the Totenlager [death camp] in Treblinka. I remember standing there next to the pits full of blue-black corpses. It had nothing to do with humanity—it couldn’t have; it was a mass—a mass of rotting flesh. (Christian) Wirth said, ‘What shall we do with this ...?’ ”
But sure ask detailed questions and in return give monosyllabic answers
You're fooling no one
Omg 🙄
You asked: Are you implying that subsequent investigations which identified mass graves are wrong?
My answer: No.
Now, Was there more than one 'subsequent investigation'?
Nazi comes from National Socialist....
Never forget what the far left did to millions...
Of course the allies were "obsessed with winning the war". What else would you expect?
If the allies had sent 1000 bombers to Auschwitz they would have had to fly over Germany and half the planes would have been shot down.
Whatever education system you went through, the fact that your understanding of history appears to have been formed by memes is a terrible reflection on it.
Despite the title 'National Socialist German Workers Party' the Nazis were a far right revolutionary party whose first actions after gaining power was to suppress the Communists and Social Democrats.
Yes Marxists and leftists were responsible for the deaths of millions, chiefly in the Soviet Union during and before WW2. This tends to be forgotten due to the focus on the Holocaust in the West and this extends to an almost exclusive fascination with the Jewish victims of Nazi Germany. Jews were the number one target but there were others.
The nazis were left wing 😅
Some f*cking amadáns on this website 🤦♂️
Never forget what the imperialists did to millions.
If they called themselves the Ostrich Party, would you be claiming that birds were responsible?
This has to be one of the most stupid arguments from the far right.
I'd suggest you use the time you're spending on boards to learn some basic history instead.
I did... I just looked at some american history. In WW2 america was still racially segregated. Black soldiers weren't allowed to do certain roles and were treated as second class citizens.
I just find it ironic that Nazi Germany wouldnt have been defeated without millions of soldiers from a racist country....
It really makes you think.
Not sure what any of that has to do with the idiotic meme history you were trying to share here about the Nazis being left wingers. Laughable. I'm not a left wing type, but why lie about this sort of thing?
I bet in WW2 the average American GI would have thought the same way to the average German soldier...
Germany and America were both deeply racist societies that deeply believed in racial superiority......
It's almost as if the term "far right" is a bit more nuanced than people here think.
So nuanced that Nazis are left wing? I think you're better off holding your hands up to that absolute horse sh!t than trying to muddy the waters.
Why would anyone have Hitler as their avatar? Seriously?
For sure, but had the Allies realised just how monstrous Auschwitz was and the stain it would leave on humanity, they would probably have made more of an effort. I was reading that a large bombing raid on the place was technically very feasible by mid 1944 (it should be added of course that millions of Jewish people had already been murdered by this point).
Looks like it was taken from that graphic novel (cartoon) Maus which I believe is an anti-Nazi work.
Obviously if we are judging political parties from a hundred years ago to modern standards they will be "right wing"...
A hundred years ago there wasn't a welfare state and we were still hanging criminals....
Why do you keep raising complete red herrings?
The Nazis were not left-wing. No amount of word salad on your part will change this fact.
You're doing much of what you're accusing him of, by having such a black and white view of the topic. Nazis certainly had some policies that would of been considered left wing at the time, but they were also traditionalists, mainly of the Pagan or Christian variant. Glock is right in saying that the Allies would of held similar views on race, as did most of the Western world. I'd personally be of the view that the Allies really didn't care too much about what was happening to the Jews, as they didn't seem to care too much about what was happening behind the Iron Curtain to Soviet citizens, as we know that the Allies betrayed anti Soviets who were once loyal to them, to appease Stalin. Those wars were fought for power, not compassion or empathy like Hollywood would like you to think.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
