This question goes out those who took the 2 jabs? Will you you take it to get back to normality? Or are you sick of the government moving the goalposts constantly?
Double vaxed, got covid 4 weeks ago, so now not eligible for booster. Yes, if eligible I would take it. Omicron might make me eligible again.
Disingenuous bile.
First off , get over the Trump derangement syndrome, I think the users name here is tongue in cheek ...
also vaccines don't prevent transmission
The Vaccine protects YOU and only YOU.
People need to get this into their heads.
I'm well aware of this, why would I vaccinate to protect someone else, seems redundant to me
Vaccines reduce transmission.
You would take the vaccine to reduce transmission to lower the prevalence of the virus in society as a whole.
No, I took the vaccine so I don't get sick and go to hospital and / or die.
fair enough but a side effect is the societal benefit of reduced transmission.
had Janssen in may. rang chemist on Saturday to get a booster got a cancellation tommorrow Thursday.
Well in this aspect alone - they are doing a terrible job with 94% of adults vaccinated.
They have appreciably reduced serious illness and death. That's not really up for debate now and they've made a huge difference there and lives have been saved, but yes their results on transmission are not exactly brilliant at all. If 94% of adults were vaccinated against things like measles(the most infectious agent there is) or polio or smallpox transmission would fall off a cliff and would be found almost exclusively among the unvaccinated population.
I agree they work for serious illness/death prevention - but individual level, this crap that the vaccines is for everyone's safety and stops transmission needs to be dumped...
Are you saying that, by preventing you from contracting the disease, thus removing you as potential spreader of the disease, vaccines aren't reducing transmission? Never claimed it would stop, just reduce. "Vaccines would stop transmission" sounds like a strawman to justify not getting a booster.
Moderna booster also boosts. While it boosts antibodies 20 times, you still have just over half the protection you had against the original variant. This suggests that an Omicron customised booster might be wise.
https://twitter.com/laoneill111/status/1471165488071909378
But why is reduced transmission important at this stage? If as reported this new variant causes fewer health problems, should we not be allowing it to spread, given that majority of adult population are double vaccinated and if they do catch it will manage well and children cope with it well anyway. It doesn't add up.
That’s a valid point, but the experts are saying it’s too early to say omicron is milder or that it causes milder sickness.
Apparently it's important to stop large numbers of people catching it within a very short space of time (because it spreads so fast), which would mean an increase in hospital admissions in the short term even if it is less serious for most. Personally I am pinning my hopes on Omnicron spreading and displacing Delta, and the vast majority of people developing natural immunity, and then we might have a way out of this pandemic. Having said that, I did get the booster, with some reluctance - my GP offered it and there was no waiting around in a queue so it was easily availed of.
But to what extent does it lower transmission? 5% lower, 50%, 95% ?
No one can answer this and looking at the rates of transmission in our highly vaccinated country, I'd say its closer to 5% than 95%.
And that sort of reduction does not incentivise me to get the booster.
Why do you need an incentive? What are you trying to prove, or, what is it you're afraid of?
Any reduction surely takes pressure off health services.
And no skin off your nose.
Win win?
I'm not going on a vaccine merry go around for the sake it or to be seen to be a good citizen.
I'm double jabbed , I've good protection against the virus. I'm hearing no convincing message when it comes to getting the booster.
Actually there's skin off all our noses. Taxpayers are paying for the vaccines and lining the pockets of big pharma.
There's no evidence that the booster is required for young, healthy, double jabbed people.
Will another booster be required in 3 months? Where does it end?
I was unwell after both jabs, nothing major but don't fancy it on the regular. We've no idea what cumulative effect it has on the body - there are no studies on it for obvious reasonsm
I'm not anti vax, again double jabbed, but not a chance I'll be running up for my booster when I can see no benefit for it?!
Cool
Natural immunity is better really. Why would you be eager to get a booster if you got Covid 4 weeks ago?
Not getting it, experts from South Africa have enough data now to see Omi is mild
The vaccine does reduce massively reduce transmission, not complete prevention.
It's like saying you and Messi both play soccer, the details matter.
Got it today, as I'm flying back to Ireland via UK in a week. I would feel stupid if I got covid and was sick in bed for a week knowing I had the option of a boost that does no harm and decided not to take it.
SA may have sufficient data to comment on the short term effects of the variant on a relatively young population and that is all. We have sufficient data to conclude that the vaccines have relatively few side effects for the vast majority of the population and that they reduce the possibility of you catching a lethal dose of the virus. A vaccinated population collectively represents a lower risk to our healthcare services and workforce from an economic point of view. But literally no one knows the long term effects of having had COVID or the vaccines or if there even are any.
You all caught up now?
Got any data on these claims, or it is just a feeling in your waters?
So many falsehoods in such a few sentences. Poster is well know anti-vax CT spreader.
So... if you're blonde, are you more likely to spread Covid in Scandinavia? Second, 'it used to be.' Again, fake opinion. Vaccine reduces transmission as has been repeatedly explained here. That the vaccines were not designed to prevent transmission - no vaccine is - is a strawman
Can you provide a scientific peer reviewed link that shows reduction in transmission is negligible please.
Any reduction is a benefit to society.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w7.vanillicon.com/v2/713409f13dde445ace50a13a61a2d5fd.svg)
