No doubt his licence will be suspended and he won't challenge it. Surprised he didn't partner with a witch doctor!
He partnered with Dr. Pierre Kory of the Eastern Virginia medical school and president of the Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance. The current evidence that Ivermectin has a strong safety profile and has known anti-viral properties means his licence is as safe as houses. Witch doctor? ha! - you should go back to your mud hut.
In case this hasn't been posted in some time.
And it's still a load of nonsense
The same doctor promoting the same treatment as this 'doctor'
Is this **** being peddled as well as the Anti-Vaxxers, who prey upon people who are unsure or afraid of taking a vaccine.
It's easier or 'safer' to keep the status quo, in their minds, so they gravitate with these 'doctors'
Piollaire Versus the FDA. Yeah, I think I'll go with the FDA. BTW, you okay with injecting bleach too, just checking?
Maybe you should look at why doctors across the US are ignoring this FDA document and are prescribing Ivermectin. Don't let me stop you with the bleach.
Wow. You've really drank the Kool-Aid haven't you!
Who is listening to a nutjob like that? Try to distinguish the likes of her from thoughtful people of science.
The doctor you mentioned in Ireland is cut from the same cloth as her. If there's thousands of doctors recommending their patients get vaccinated and 1 saying not to, take this worming tablet instead, after the hydroxycrap and zinc didn't turn out effective. Hey at least he didn't prescribe bleach. Then again that doesn't need a prescription.
YouTube algorithms have a lot to answer for.
It's the same posters who are completely against a tested safe vaccine but continue to push the horse paste as a solution to ending this pandemic.
I'm not saying this poster and these doctors are dangerous. But their actions actively take lives.
How someone sleeps soundly peddling this stuff is beyond me.
I don't necessarily accept his other views but they are logical and reasoned unlike your one. I respect someone who is independent and goes against the herd mentality. It is of course up to you if you want to pass up on an effective therapeutic for you and your family if a worming tablet is not good enough for you.
Ha! From where I'm standing everyone else is glugging it back!
We're talking about Ivermectin here as a therapeutic and not as a replacement for vaccines.
So you accept the views you believe in, yeah that's a little more dangerous than following a herd mentality.
A certain doctor once said "In one video from 2013, the doctor attributes medical conditions such as endometriosis, fibroids, and cysts to “spirit husbands”, demons that have sex with women while they sleep.
“They are responsible for serious gynaecological problems,” Dr Immanuel said. “We call them all kinds of names—endometriosis, we call them molar pregnancies, we call them fibroids, we call them cysts, but most of them are evil deposits from the spirit husband.”
She definitely goes against the herd mentality, so you respect her. A president suggests bleach as a cure, he went against the herd mentality, you respect him also. Plenty of serial killers have gone against the herd mentality..... shall I go on?
Please please don't
And do you agree vaccines work and are safe and have done your part by getting jabbed to end this pandemic?
I believe that in decades to come they will marvel at the amount of disinformation that was allowed to freely propagate during in these, relatively, early years of the internet. Two things in particular I think are pivotal:
I hope that in years to come the free reign that the social media companies have enjoyed up until now, will be as anachronistic as cigarette advertising is today.
It's off topic but the vaccines are very effective at stopping serious disease, hospitalisations and death. However breakthrough infections and those who haven't been vaccinated for whatever reason could benefit from this inexpensive therapeutic.
And have you got double jabbed to ensure we got out of this sooner rather that later.
You obviously presume that I haven't, think what you want - I'm here to talk about the merits of Ivermectin.
With like zero evidence to back it up!
a little too close to the bone was it?
No it was just pompous
There is 2 medicines, A and B, both off patent, can be made by anyone, both cheap, both been used in medicine for years.
Medicine A went through a peer reviewed study, was found to be effective and is now being used, B also went through numerous studies but the results were inconclusive or the study was biased in some way, B is not being used and no major company is running further studies even though they could make a lot of money from it if it's effective.
Do people understand why medicine A became recommended and medicine B didn't?
Incidentally, it would be great if Invermectin was proven to work, all the Pharma companies and the generic manufacturers would start making it.
Well this shows you haven't paid any attention to the Ivermectin debate at all.
I'm actually surprised that there's still an active Ivermectin thread given that the original study, that supported its use, has been thoroughly debunked. I guess this is one of those things that some people will hold onto, despite no supporting evidence.
Now this is blatant misinformation - one study in Egypt was withdrawn and there are still 50 odd others that still stand.
Take Poster A - this poster has no idea how the economics of generic drugs work. There is no Poster B
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eedacf599b4135dfd56d6fdbddcbd867.svg)
