yourdeadwright wrote: » I can't see him stopping Dustin at LW , He will have to put to much gas into it & then Dustin will get him when he is tired,
eagle eye wrote: » So you are just not including what suits you and not Aldo, Mendes, Poirier and Holloway. You pick 26 as the younger age so as to avoid them. Lol.
Tazzimus wrote: » You've clearly never been on the receiving end of one. They are deeply, deeply unpleasant.
simongurnick wrote: » Any thoughts on how Conor will be prepared for the calf kicks this time round? Now, Dustin may not utilize them at all as it will seem very obvious, but at the same time if they are there for the taking, he will take them. One of the best ways to combat these kicks, is to deliver them yourself, so will be interesting to see if Conor uses the same tactice, a la Diaz 2. Stance will have to change for sure. Any thoughts?
Tazzimus wrote: » And that's why cups are so important. Those stabbing teeps he used to do suck the soul out of you, could usually see the effect fairly quickly after a few of them.
AbusesToilets wrote: » I'd like to see McGregor kick, period. Where were the stabbing teeps, or thigh shots? He looked so much sharper against Cowboy than he did vs Dustin.
The Nal wrote: Hes only beaten a much smaller washed up Alvarez, a washed up Cerrone and a punchbag in Nate through his peak years.
Deleted User wrote: » Brimage was a flyweight Holloway was a kid Brandao was a bum Poirier was an illegal punch Siver was a gimme fight Mendes was off the couch Aldo was a lucky punch He scraped a win in Diaz 2 Alvarez was a bum champion Cowboy was well past it There you have it. :pac:
Deleted User wrote: » MrStuffins is the biggest expert Only if u'on here, as far as I can tell.
Brief_Lives wrote: » Hi guys, I know you are all experts here, I am not. How well will Conor do against Dustin? has he put on enough weight, is he training correctly? Again, I'm a total amateur, but it's good to see an irish guy win on the big stage...
MrStuffins wrote: » As I said, Eddie won't go down as one of the GOATs, but if there's a higher title a fighter can achieve to be considered "top class" than being the UFC Champion then i'd like to hear about it.
yourdeadwright wrote: » My view of Eddie is that while he was always a good fighter but never top class,
Mellor wrote: » There was obviously a reasonably middle ground.
MrStuffins wrote: » The Alvarez revisionism is always just to suit the McGregor nay-sayers. And especially lads who rolled out of bed in 2015 when McGregor was fighting Mendes and had only "MMA for Dummies" to use to catch up on the history of the sport in order to pretend they knew what they were talking about. Dos Anjos was a man on a 10-1 streak (the lone loss coming to Khabib) and was the undisputed UFC LW Champion. There was no controversy, he beat the undisputed champ at the time (Pettis) systematically over 5 rounds (50-45 across the board if I remember correctly and so favoured was he that they put Pettis front and centre of the poster with RDA stood slightly behind him). He had also defended the belt. There was no controversy. RDA was the undisputed champ. Eddie Alvarez then beat him, he knocked him out. It was not a contentious stoppage, there was no dodgy split decision, it was as comprehensive as it gets. Round 1. There was no controversy. Will Alvarez go down as one of the GOATs? No. Was Eddie Alvarez the undisputed UFC LW Champion on the day that Conor McGregor dismantled him? Yes. Of that there is no doubt.
StringerBell wrote: » Do they? I can only speak for my own circle and it was more the talk of it was interesting in that if Eddie could take him down he would be in with a shot but it would have meant him fighting to a plan and not being himself basically - consensus being that he was just too easy to hit and someone with McGregors accuracy and timing would tee off on him.
simongurnick wrote: » If everyone is saying McGregor has so much money that he isn't motivated anymore, than why is he even taking this fight? You can say a payday but he could land a similar payday against a less dangerous opponent. Was listening to Bisping last night take about the pyschology of being knocked out and he thinks it takes big balls to make this rematch so quick. Interesting to see how it pans out next week but I like the fact he has toned down the media and not brought the kids along.
Mellor wrote: » Alvarez had just won the LW belt, the biggest achievement in his career. The condenses was that Conor was going to get wrecked by he bigger wrestler. Lads love the old washed up Hyperbole. Sure Dustin has only beaten a much smaller Holloway, scrapped past a washed up Eddie, abd bested a washed up McGregor. :pac:
FileNotFound wrote: » I think when Mcgregor was invested in the sport he was great. He fought those they put in front of him and did what needed doing. ever since he went off doing other stuff, reduced his fight rate - he just has not looked the same sharp dangerous guy. In fairness he took on bigger men in the division above and beat eddie and even diaz. No mean feat that few have achieved.
yourdeadwright wrote: » I don't rate Eddie never did but Conor performance to beat him has to go down as one of the greatest ever in UFC history , He came up a weight for a title fight and just dismantled him, There was no lucky punch or no caught him early or anything like that he literally took him apart for 2 rounds, Almost a punch perfect performance,
The Nal wrote: » Those 3 are true. Those 3 fighters have lost a dozen or so fights between them in the last 5 or so years. Well beaten in a lot of them vs average competition too. Hardly a great 5 or so years for McGregor. Diaz 2 the best of those McGregor fights. An all timer.