buzzerxx wrote: » NPHET stands for "No Pubs, Hotels, Entertainment or Tourism." #DisbandNPHET The lies will be permanent.https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10222263630592047&set=a.1750128025376
Dohnjoe wrote: » Cases are rising again, so they've made a decision based on that. Do you believe there is some conspiracy behind this, if so, what is it?
MEGA BRO WOLF 5000 wrote: » Cases! Nooooooo.. those bloody cases killing everyone.. how about actual figures like the number of people in ICU..and trust me on this, they're not young and healthy.
King Mob wrote: » That's kinda the point though. If pearcider and other conspiracy theorists aren't able to point to any kind of time, either exact or inexact, that shows that their claims aren't actually based on anything. If they had special insight or secret information, then they'd be able to point out a specific time frame. If however they were just making **** up, like all the previous claims of this in years previous, then they'd keep the time frame vague and open to avoid having to admit they were wrong. Pearcider won't answer because he can't provide an answer. He can't provide an answer because the conspiracy twitter cranks he's listening to don't provide an answer. They don't provide an answer because they're making **** up to sell to the gullible.
pearcider wrote: » You only have to look at the debt to gdp ratios of the US - or Ireland for that matter. All fiat currencies (and the governments that back them) eventually return to their intrinsic value. Zero. No I don’t have particular insight or information. I just know my history. It is all freely available to the interested observer. Of course the main stream media don’t report on it. Sure they will report on the symptoms of the malaise affecting us but not on the actual causes. See for example the hullabaloo about the investment funds buying up housing estates in Kildare. This is just an example of the Cantillion effect which the central banks governments are themselves wholly complicit in. But there is no real news anymore it’s all fake.
King Mob wrote: » Ok. So when will this happen? At what point will you accept that your prediction was wrong? If you don't have any insight or information, what's the difference between your claims and just plucking stuff out of the air? What makes your prediction different from all of the exact same predictions that have been made for years now?
pearcider wrote: » It’s not a prediction it’s a mathematical certainty.
pearcider wrote: » We are in the endgame for the worlds financial system and the elite know this.
PuddingBreath wrote: » see ya'll summer 2022 for a scoop in the pub following our third "booster" jab or in 2023 following our 8th injection ?!
buzzerxx wrote: » Why do you ask? Do you condone this new sick covid measure on dying children?
pearcider wrote: » It’s not a prediction it’s a mathematical certainty. We are in the endgame for the worlds financial system and the elite know this.
Gortanna wrote: » https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-covid-vaccine-lockdown-scotland-school-cases/#comments "Wearing face masks and social distancing should continue after July 19, a World Health Organisation (WHO) expert has warned. Dr David Nabarro, Special Envoy on Covid-19 for the WHO, said while he accepts keeping the restrictions will make people angry, his advice is to keep restrictions in place. He told the BBC's Radio 4 PM programme: "We do have to be prepared for the inevitability that viruses will continue to be a problem for us. We're going to have to really seriously contemplate continuing to practise some degree of physical distancing, some degree of mask wearing, some degree of hygiene, some degree of protecting those who are most at risk, as long as there are these nasty viruses around, whether or not we're vaccinated." Viruses have always been, and will always be around. If Dr David Nabarro gets his way then mask wearing and social distancing will be permanent. At least in the UK. But we were told and assured that they were temporary measures.
[Deleted User] wrote: » https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-news-covid-vaccine-lockdown-scotland-school-cases/#comments "Wearing face masks and social distancing should continue after July 19, a World Health Organisation (WHO) expert has warned. Dr David Nabarro, Special Envoy on Covid-19 for the WHO, said while he accepts keeping the restrictions will make people angry, his advice is to keep restrictions in place. He told the BBC's Radio 4 PM programme: "We do have to be prepared for the inevitability that viruses will continue to be a problem for us. We're going to have to really seriously contemplate continuing to practise some degree of physical distancing, some degree of mask wearing, some degree of hygiene, some degree of protecting those who are most at risk, as long as there are these nasty viruses around, whether or not we're vaccinated." Viruses have always been, and will always be around. If Dr David Nabarro gets his way then mask wearing and social distancing will be permanent. At least in the UK. But we were told and assured that they were temporary measures.
Dohnjoe wrote: » If the virus persists to a certain level and variants keep emerging, why wouldn't we use measures to reduce it? There's a jab available for seasonal flu every year because the flu is seasonal. Does that make sense to you or no? If no, what don't you get?
robinph wrote: » I don't think you understand the words that you are reading. SOME measures will continue for SOME time in SOME situations while there is still a risk from viruses. Yet you are twisting this into the person you are quoting as being part of a plot to make us all wear masks forever more for some unknown reasons.
[Deleted User] wrote: » He's saying viruses in general. Viruses will always be around. Ergo, the measures have to be permanent.
Gortanna wrote: » He's saying viruses in general. Viruses will always be around. Ergo, the measures have to be permanent.
[Deleted User] wrote: » He's saying as long as there are 'these nasty viruses around'. Not just covid. He's moved onto viruses in general. Variants will constantly emerge. If measures are going to be used for variants then they have to be permanent. Actually, speaking of the flu, Neil Clark has written about the possibility of a flu lockdown: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527627-winter-lockdown-flu-uk/Permanent mask wearing and social distancing for viruses in general means the end of hospitality (it's probably too late in a number of countries) and many businesses.
We're going to have to really seriously contemplate continuing to practise some degree of physical distancing, some degree of mask wearing, some degree of hygiene, some degree of protecting those who are most at risk, as long as there are these nasty viruses around, whether or not we're vaccinated."
Gortanna wrote: » He's saying as long as there are 'these nasty viruses around'. Not just covid. He's moved onto viruses in general. Variants will constantly emerge. If measures are going to be used for variants then they have to be permanent. Actually, speaking of the flu, Neil Clark has written about the possibility of a flu lockdown: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527627-winter-lockdown-flu-uk/ Permanent mask wearing and social distancing for viruses in general means the end of hospitality (it's probably too late in a number of countries) and many businesses.
runawaybishop wrote: » Ergo my ass. Your leaps in logic are astounding. Its his opinion that they should be permanent, but as we know they are not. Also more selective quoting from you, what a surprise. The experts have said it will ultimately be a political decision, and many ministers have pointed out that they cannot wait to ditch their masks.
[Deleted User] wrote: » At least you acknowledge that he wants them to be permanent. A handful of ministers have said they want to ditch them, but the new Health Secretary, Sajid Javid, has refused to rule out them continuing to be required after the 19th of July.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » He's not on about hospitality though, "in some cases" means hospitals, care homes, etc. You're saying hospitality is pretty much over yet bars/pubs/restaurants etc are booming here in the UK. From.your own link
King Mob wrote: » But you admitted that you can't explain why they want to make masks permanent. There's no reason for why they would want to. You have agreed this is the case. So why do you keep saying that they are going to be permanent? Why do you have to keep misinterpreting articles to support a conspiracy theory you've admitted was nonsense?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5d62a35d50b8dba45150b8451b6cb1b3.svg)
