Mantis Toboggan wrote: » Where are you seeing that it was the 5th club?
Pogue eile wrote: » I am familiar with the case and the individuals involved, one of the clubs wasnt even in Tipp! Cashel will regret this big time and there is already a massive divide within the club over it and they havent even lined out for them yet.
Deleted User wrote: » I think this is a lazy assumption about young players. We'd have had an exodus a long time ago if this was the case. Plus if it was a case of moving for medals, they could do a lot better than Cashel who has more traditionally been an oval ball town aside from a purple patch in the 80s/90s
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » I'd heard boherlahan were sounded out but what were the others? Hopefully the lads can get back to playing hurling, fancy Cashel to be competitive in the west this year.
Pogue eile wrote: » One other mid tipp club and one in the south, the other was a Limerick club.It's one thing saying that it will be great to see them back playing, but what about the 5 Cashel lads who have given all their career to their own club and will now be cast aside for 5 outsiders, are the Brownes/Ryans mor. e important because they have represented Tipp?
1373 wrote: » It’s not lazy, it’s the way it is now. My own club have had players come and players go , it’s not a big deal anymore. Only difference here is the numbers involved. If a fringe player left our club,while disappointing, it would be accepted. If an inter county player asked to transfer, I don’t think it would be so smooth
Pogue eile wrote: » One other mid tipp club and one in the south, the other was a Limerick club. It's one thing saying that it will be great to see them back playing, but what about the 5 Cashel lads who have given all their career to their own club and will now be cast aside for 5 outsiders, are the Brownes/Ryans more important because they have represented Tipp?
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » But players transfer all the time, I myself transferred twice before hanging up the hurley. Clubs I joined were delighted and weren't too worried about one of their own having to sit on the bench.
farmerval wrote: » Very few goal chances, the Waterford half forward line was missing in action a lot, their full forward line never got going, never got a service, .
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » As bad as Waterford were today I'm happy to be avoiding them, they really missed prunty, Barron and de burca. Clare are decent but if we're going to be serious contenders then we really should be able to beat them with a few to spare. Hard to know if the week turnaround is a good thing or not. Something tells me that match will have benefitted them alot.
farmerval wrote: » Normally you would have said before today's game that whoever won the preliminary round would come on for having the game. With the league finishing so late and both of today's teams finishing the league well, you would have expected two really sharp teams, instead they both looked like they hadn't played in weeks. The Tipp team will be interesting, should indicate what way management are thinking. You'd possibly expect; Barry Hogan Barrett at 2 Paidi at 3??? Barry Heff at 4 Brendan at 5 Seamus Kennedy at 6 Ronan at 7 Midfield Breen and Flynn Half line Dan Mc Noel McGrath Jake Morris Full line; Bubbles Jason Forde John McGrath Assuming that Niall O Meara is not fit. Leaves Seamie on the bench, could as easily be John McGrath Brian McGrath and Eoin Connolly and Craig Morgan defensive subs Willie Connors, Paddy Cadell as midfield subs Mark Keogh, Seamie, Paul Flynn, Dylan Quirke as forward subs. (I assume I am forgetting someone)
Deleted User wrote: » Liam Devanney moved to The Sars from Borrisilleagh. its nothing new.
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » This would be my team for Clare - 4 midfielders - two defensive 2 holding 3 - 3 - 2 - 2 - 2 - 2 formation Hogan - don't mind which one Barrett - Paidie - Heffernan Brendan - Kennedy - Ronan Dan - Caddel Breen - Noel John McGrath - Seamie Conners - Forde
Pogue eile wrote: » Would agree with a lot of that. For me Barry is miles ahead of Brian in pretty every facet of his game and should definitely get the nod. I would start Flynn ahead of Cadell - Cadell was briliant for one half of hurling and was septic for at least a game and a half - I think he will be a big player for us but is just not ready yet, needs to work on his weaker side and his speed of hurling. Great attitude and ability though and will be a very important player for Tipp. I would definitely start Bubbles as well, we are so much better when Bubbles is on form, so Bubbles in for Conners for me - whoever starts midfield will not last the full 70 mins anyway so Conners is a great man off the bench. I have seen a number of people raise concerns over Padraic Maher v Shannagher and I have to say I don't share those concerns at all. Yesterday the Clare half back line were given so much room and space that Conlon had 30 secs every time to look up and pick out Shannagher, Shannagher was marking a rookie FB who was only there because of injuries and Shannagher scored a grand total of zero, he came closer to hitting himself than hitting the target.
Tipp 77 wrote: » The big decision is who picks up Tony Kelly. I'd have Barry Heffernan sticking to him like glue. Paidi could take Shannagher then
formerlyET wrote: » Would it be worth shoving Dan on Conlon and tell him to stick to him like glue?
Mantis Toboggan wrote: » No, we just need to make him defend, get him turned and running back, that's where we'll look to expose him imo.
formerlyET wrote: » Yeah, you're right. Constant running into corners. But I'd imagine with the amount of forwards Clare bring back to plug space, Clare will come up with something to have Conlan free to pick up ball and not mark anyone. Might be worth having a plan B.
Pogue eile wrote: » Conlon wont be able to afford to do that with the likes of Noel McGrath and Seamie around, Waterford were too rigid and refused to deviate from their running through the lines approach - the best way to counter a deep lying half back line is to pop over handy points from distance.
formerlyET wrote: » True, but the wide count will have to be a lot better than it was in most of the league games. That said, Clare probbaly won't set up like they did against Waterford - they might adopt a running through the lines game. With Tony Kelly out around midfield - in a free role and O'Donnell in at full forward.