El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Matt Carter was talking about it as a fact that he's still explicitly under contract to Mercedes. Hard to know what the truth is. All we can do is wait and see what happens.
pjohnson wrote: » Maybe Matt should tell Mercedes. They dont seem aware they have Ocon contracted to the company.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I'll leave them to it. We have conflicting information so all we can do is wait and see what happens.
Harika wrote: » I think it's hilarious that Russell, who hasn't even scored a single point in F1 in his third! season, is seen as the saviour that will threaten Lewis more than Bottas.
Frank Bullitt wrote: » We don't really, Ocon signed for 3 years with Alpine. That to me means no ties to Merc...at all.
Captain_Crash wrote: » Someone mentioned in this forum quote some time ago, last season maybe, that Ocon’s ties are with Toto and not Merc. Basically Toto is his managing his career and his drive is a separate deal! I’m guessing negotiated by Toto! This was alluded to in an episode of D2S last season when he was telling him he’s working on a seat for him so I’d imagine that’s the relationship!
flazio wrote: » He's scored 3. 2 points for 9th and 1 point for fastest lap in the Sakhir Grand Prix.
Harika wrote: » My bad, that was in the all conjuring Mercedes?
duploelabs wrote: » I would say Toto (the agent) negotiated a clause in Ocon's contract for a reduce release from his Alpine contract should Merc come calling
pjohnson wrote: » This is 90% the most likely scenario.
pjohnson wrote: » It seems you and Matt are the only two claiming theres a secret contract. Everything else says ties severed when he joined Renault.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » No it doesn't. It doesnt preclude other contractual obligations with Mercedes e.g. he can sign for whoever he likes but Mercedes can call him home at any time they want or at predetermined points like after the end of s season, or they have to pay a buyout payment but have the choice to buy him out. Who knows?
Frank Bullitt wrote: » That is complete conjecture on your part. I could equally say Ferrari could have the same sway, doesn't make it true. He has no contractual obligations with Mercedes, none.
duploelabs wrote: » Except the team boss is also his agent
pjohnson wrote: » For someone who "doesnt have a clue" you sure love repeating incorrect claims.
muckwarrior wrote: » I know he's not the first example of it, but it seems a bit bizarre that a team principal can also be a driver agent. How is it not a conflict of interests?
barryribs wrote: » https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/57476106 Pirelli investigated their own tyres and to the shock of absolutely no one, the found that their tyres were fine. Its hard to think of a worse tyre manufacturere in F1 without a tyre war going on.