gozunda wrote: » True but doesn't really answer why India didn't experience significant rates of infection in 2020.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » When new cases are announced daily do they tell you if those new cases are from vaccinated people? I mean lets say '' 547 new cases '' today, but all 547 cases are from vaccinated people who don't know they have it and never would know without a test. I just don't get why they keep making a big deal out of cases, same in UK, 8000 positive cases yesterday, but all 8000 are vaccinated and living it up down the pub. Who gives a fck. Vaccine does not stop you getting covid, but it stops you knowing you ever had it, as it has no effect once vaccinated, so why keep making a big deal out of cases.
landofthetree wrote: » 22% of the population are age 14 or under. You cant have herd immunity when the 22% who havent got the vaccine are mixing all the time?
tommybrees wrote: » ......... the minister of health in this country has more power at the moment because of emergency legislation powers than any other person in history.
Tenger wrote: » The vaccine will be rolled out to 12+ group by September anyway. (already done in the USA)
Tenger wrote: » Data shows that kids are less likely to be carriers. The vaccine will be rolled out to 12+ group by September anyway. (already done in the USA) Getting 80% of adults done (or at least 1 dose) by end of July will have a significant impact. More than the English King or the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland? Or are we counting Global history? Chinese emeperors? Kublai Khan? The Czars? Quenn Victoria? Etc etc
Micky 32 wrote: » Vaccines work. This will end at least in the sense that you’ll get to enjoy the things you once enjoyed doing before all this happened.
FintanMcluskey wrote: » You say that with a confidence previously seen when people proclaimed last Summer that normality would return when the vulnerable were vaccinated We are now further from normality than we were last Summer with no vaccines
Micky 32 wrote: » I do love the comparisons of March 2020 and December. A lot has changed since then. A lot of people have had vaccinations since. Or did you forget about the vaccinations? Especially the most vulnerable and old.
crooked cockney villain wrote: » I'm confused as to how it is now 25% of cases in the North but only circa 1% of cases here. I can't imagine they have significantly more travel to mainland UK than we do, in fact as Protestants were less likely to emigrate there would be less family ties on the mainland and thus surely per capita less travel there. .
SusanC10 wrote: » I really hope you are right on this. I just find it odd that despite EMA approval for 12+ that there is little to no mention by the powers that be of this age group getting vaccinated.
Melanchthon wrote: » ....... Tldr: how do we know more of the positive tests here aren't this variant.
Tenger wrote: » It's purely anecdotal but I read somewhere about a week ago that only 30% of our positive cases are sequenced for variants. Large pinch of salt with that info though.
Doctor Jimbob wrote: » I find the idea that we need a significant proportion of under 18s fully vaccinated for herd immunity disturbing considering that when schools were being reopened we were told that children were low risk for transmission and serious illness.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » Yes the landscape of protection has changed given vaccination. However the nature of transmissibility and potentially virulence has also changed. I think you’re arguing against things people aren’t saying. Nothing is nailed on and nobody is claiming it is. But it’s pointless dismissing the potential for a deterioration in metrics that slows reopening / reimposes some restrictions. It’s as silly to outright dismiss this variant as it is to outright claim we will be back in lockdown.
Micky 32 wrote: » Oh give over. No one is dismissing the variants and i have said we need to be cautious . . I was pointing out there is a difference comparing December and March 2020 using that as a metric for the doomsday predictions on here.. i have never argued with anyone that we should open up and let it rip tomorrow. I have always said it would be autumn before normality resumes and i’m standing by it. The narrative on here is if you read between the lines is the vaccines aren’t great back in lockdown by winter. The facts clearly paint me a different picture. Sleeves are being rolled up by the thousands every day .
LuckyLloyd wrote: » Again, your “reading between the lines” is leaping to a mad conclusion not actually in writing from posters, or the vast majority anyway. Which makes further conversation pointless!
tom1ie wrote: » With the elderly and vulnerable vaccinated, will it matter if cases start increasing like in the UK? The higher case numbers won't translate into hospital cases as the people most at risk are vaccinated. Plus we will be continuing the rollout of the vaccine program. Or am I missing something here?
fun loving criminal wrote: » I wonder did things look bad in India because India has a high rate of vitamin D deficiency? A quick Google shows that 70-90% of Indians are deficient in the vitamin.
ShineOn7 wrote: » That and poor nutrition, poverty in general and what are probably the most dense "everyone on top of each other" living conditions in the world It was a ticking time bomb
phormium wrote: » Actually I watched a programme in the middle of the night last weekend when I couldn't sleep that was reporting on Covid in India, the bulk of the cases were from the slightly better off areas of society, the slums/shanty towns where they are practically on top of each other remained relatively clear of it. Conclusion was that they had a much better immune system in those overcrowded areas due to the living conditions and while there were cases of Covid very little serious illness with it.
Turtwig wrote: » Population medically vulnerable to covid <<< population at lowest risk to covid. Even at very low risk the large size of the population pool is enough for there to be significant hospitalisations.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » At the end of the day vaccines or no vaccines, emerging trends in infections, hospitalisations and deaths will dictate policy.
wadacrack wrote: » Sinovac is still pretty effective, 67% or so. I did mention that vaccines will mitigate the risk too. This variant will transmit too quickly in the Uk to prevent a significant third wave. The scale of infection will be too high in spite of vaccination.
Hardyn wrote: » They did. I've seem some estimates that say 50% of their population may have been infected in 2020.
PTH2009 wrote: » https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0612/1227733-covid-19-ireland-vaccines/ 'There has been contact at ministerial level today between the Irish and British governments following the rising number of cases of the more infectious Delta variant in the UK. The case numbers are being closely watched by the Government and senior sources have indicated that small changes to the current travel restrictions between UK and here could be considered. Currently, people arriving here from Britain have to quarantine at home but they can exit that after five days if they get a second negative PCR test. However, that five-day period could be possibly extended by several days - but no decisions have yet been taken on the matter.Ministers are now likely to consult Chief Medical Officer Dr Tony Holohan on the issue.'
[Deleted User] wrote: » Indoor pubs etc. should be delayed until everyone is fully vaccinated (Tony will have no problem advocating this). Great weather currently for outdoor socialising anyhow.