Daeltaja wrote: » Wait, it doesn't have temp control? That would have made it a tempting combination of convenience and reliability. I have invested heavily in a homebrew setup (probably close to 2.5k) and while I love the ~5hr brew day process, I am keen to find something cheap that allows me to 'set-and-forget' to test new recipes before scaling them up to 23L or so. Not that the Pinter is suited to that anyway.
boetstark wrote: » Got the pinter last month. For time and effort I don't like it. Results are hit and miss The area that it is left to ferment has to stay around 18 degrees. Any variance causes poor results. Space taken up in fridge for cold crashes and conditioning I live in Limerick. I am selling it for 60 euro, as new, used twice
FileNotFound wrote: » In fairness to the Pinter (as someone about to get one) it seems an entry level way to make homebrew with little mess or fuss. More entertainment than effective cost cutting - It will work out as the cost of about 100 bottles of fraziskaner for kit and stuff to make 20 pints, then almost a euro a pint (once shipping added) for follow on brews. Prob won't taste as good either but doubt its aimed at the serious homebrew market
FileNotFound wrote: » In fairness to the Pinter (as someone about to get one) it seems an entry level way to make homebrew with little mess or fuss. More entertainment than effective cost cutting - It will work out as the cost of about 100 bottles of fraziskaner for kit and stuff to make 20 pints, then almost a euro a pint (once shipping added) for follow on brews.
sharingan wrote: » Or to summarise: 10c per pint is doable with skill, yeast management, access to bulk buying of resources (bulk rates, AND skipping courier charges). You wont do it for all beer styles, and the beer will be low in strength. I have ignored other direct costs, such as finings, sanitiser, cleaning products, yeast nutrient etc. They wont add much, but its possible to forego them Raising this per-pint figure opens up the types of styles that can be attempted, the strength, and lets you put in more flavourful/indulgent options. 25c .. 50c per pint etc. We are still talking cheaper than the super saver veg section in Lidl. Even when you are being indulgent, your per-pint cost is a small fraction of the equivalent in the supermarket. And still way short of the consumable cost of the Pinter system (which in some cases is even higher than the equivalent supermarket product).
Bu(l)y buying everything from frugal sources (club yeast buy, malt direct, low amounts of hops) and avoiding postage costs: 25Kg malt ~22e 100g hopa ~5e yeast ~10e I use half the sack of malt to make 55L beer, so 26e so about 24c per 500ml. If I pitch onto a yeast cake, and I am not fussy about hops (use the freebies) : 10c per 500ml. ... I definitely have made good beer (reusing yeast, hop bulk buys) close to 10-15c per 500ml dispense.
Deleted User wrote: » I honestly don't see how what I've posted already could be seen as snarky in any way possible, but I know where you're coming from. I will be bowing out of this thread after this post anyway, so don't worry. I understand the concept pretty well, believe it or not. What I don't understand is you making a claim, being challenged, then refusing to provide anything to back that claim up and telling others you'll elaborate on your figures, but then refusing to do so. You are now getting all condescending towards me when I flagged that you haven't backed it up.........case in point: Childish, puerile nonsense. "not that there's anything wrong with that" is the hallmark of someone who thinks that, yes, there is in fact something wrong with that, in their eyes. Like a priest talking about gay people or something. Since YOU'RE so good at maths, please tell me how "close to 15c per 500nl dispensed" equates to 10c per pint? Not once in this thread has anybody mentioned 10c/Litre until now. Nobody has even shown how it can be produced for 10c per pint yet. Despite your protestations and your promises to elaborate, you are included in this group. It may well be possible, of that I'm certain. My point was that nobody has demonstrated it so far.
BeerNut wrote: » Seriously lads, tone down the snark. Ye're sucking the fun out of what should be an enjoyable hobby.
Bogwoppit wrote: » I’ll forgive you for not understanding the concept but please show me where my claims are ridiculed?
If you’re only using kits then you’re probably only at this a wet week so less of the arrogance would be appreciated (there’s nothing wrong with kits btw).
Since you’ve proven to be so good at maths already then surely you should understand that the cost of a pint will be based on a price per unit volume, from there it’s a simple dilution factor to get your cost below your target.
As I’ve said before, I’ve made beer for very close to 10c/litre, I have no desire to make it cheaper but I (and any homebrewer) absolutely have the ability. Yes, as stated before, the beer will not be very strong or be bursting with flavour, but it will still likely hold its own against a mass market lager.
Deleted User wrote: » Kits only, I've no experience with the full grain method. I'd be delighted to hear that elaboration, please.
Bogwoppit wrote: » If you don’t understand how myself and others have explained it then I’d be happy to elaborate. Actually, before I do, can you just let us know if you have any experience with home brew or not?
[Deleted User] wrote: » It most certainly has not been shown. The lowest we've gotten to is between 10c and 15c per 500ml. That is between 14% and 70% more expensive than the claim which was made and ridiculed.
[Deleted User] wrote: » 10c per 500ml = 11.40c per pint 15c per 500ml = 17.00c per pint Getting "close to" those figures implies that it'll end up costing even more more. I'm not saying it ain't cheap, but he was right to query the "10c per pint" claim when nobody has been able to back that claim up so far.
sharingan wrote: » close to 10-15c per 500ml dispense.
loyatemu wrote: » Even bottle conditioning you can turn out a decent beer in a 3 weeks; 10 days in the fermenter, 10 days in the bottle (quicker again if you're using Kveik yeast). Darker beers do benefit from longer in the bottle.
Bogwoppit wrote: » I ferment imagine a normal fermenter with S04 yeast, it’s fast and clean, it will ferment out in about 7-9 days, cold crash for a couple of days then into the keg to carbonate for 2-3 days before it’s ready to serve. If you use a pressure fermenter you can take 2-3 days off that too. Carbonation using bottled co2 is a lot quicker than bottle conditioning.
Garibaldi? wrote: » What is the alcohol content of this product? Seems very quick to make!
shtpEdthePlum wrote: » Tbf you have to leave homebrewed beer mature for a lot longer than two weeks. I would say three months is the absolute minimum.
winstonia83 wrote: » 10c a pint? No chance
shtpEdthePlum wrote: » That's a cool product, never knew about it. I'm still brewing the old fashioned way. How does it handle the carbonation without exploding? I don't want to spend money on new equipment this season, but it's definitely on my radar now. Is the finished product after two weeks as good as other longer fermentation homebrew you've had?
Bogwoppit wrote: » I regularly have beer ready in 2 weeks using corny kegs. Not that difficult really.
winstonia83 wrote: » Example needed
Bogwoppit wrote: » Absolutely yes you can.