bubblypop wrote: » I do agree with immigration control, as I outlined. Not sure about where the rich and politicians live? There are immigrants everywhere in our society.
bubblypop wrote: » This whole post is confusing and not because I'm awake or whatever I don't know why you think being white is evil. I agree no-one should be proud of something they had no act in. There are Irish born non whites, there are Irish born whites, there are Irish born non irish, there are non Irish born Irish, they can be for or against immigration, that's their own choice. are they racist? That depends on them. Of course there are borders in the world, I don't know anyone who believes in uncontrolled immigration! And if white people are the minority in the world, what does that mean? Or matter?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Ok, fair enough. I fundamentally disagree, numbers aren't weird. Society will collapse without proper immigration control, including eventually the areas where the rich and politicians live.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I'm neither pro or anti migration. Migration exists, and it's not going to end. The best we can do is ensure that it's managed in a manner that benefits the nation. As for being working class or middle class, I would say both groups have been heavily impacted by the last twenty years. As for Irish politicians, they don't all live in foxrock or similar posh areas. Many of their own communities will have been affected by migration.. the issue is more to do with whether they care, and/or take responsibility for the consequences of their decisions. I suspect it comes down to a lack of responsibility...
bubblypop wrote: » I don't have numbers. I think it's weird to have numbers. I think there should be visas given out to workers, depending on the need in this country. I believe EU citizens can live and work here, as per the law, but I believe they should have to register their residence somewhere. I believe that asylum seekers and refugees should be taken in as per international agreement.
Deleted User wrote: » Yes, agreed. In general, I'm pro-migration but it should be strictly limited and for the benefit of Irish society. It should never have been allowed get to 18%+ of our population and still rapidly rising. I'm from a working class area of Ireland and the changes to our community in the last 20 years have been over-whelming, it's deeply unfair on our children. My disdain for Irish politicians is because they wouldn't dare change their own communities at the pace they've changed ours.
[Deleted User] wrote: » The interesting thing about racism is that it only seems to matter when White people engage in it. Like, racism is commonplace throughout the world (I've been on the receiving end of it in Asia and Africa)
[Deleted User] wrote: » I've given that answer previously. How many do you think should be allowed in per annum? Do you want any caps? Should it be 30,000 a year into Ireland, 100,000, maybe a million? How many should be allowed into the EU every year? Should it be 1 million, 5 million, 10 million per year? I'd be genuinely interested in your figures. For reference I've previously stated that I'd be happy with Macrons proposal for France to be implemented in Ireland. He wants a cap of 30,000 non EU immigrants a year allowed into France, that would give Ireland a nett immigration figure of 2,000 non EU per year. We had 10 times that in 2019.
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » Its like being white is almost evil. if you are white and male then even worse. god fordid you are white, male and straight, then there is no hope for you. I have in the past seen people speak about "Proud to be Irish" for the record, I dont think anyone should ever be proud of being something they had no choice in. Thats akin to being proud of being left legged or right handed or proud not to be bald. Its like gay pride, or proud to be irish, why take pride in something you had absolutely no control over, In the words of George Carlin pride should be reserved for something you achieve, be it a wall you built, a painting you did etc, not because you come from a certain place on a map. However there is a human desire to protect what you are used to, your way of life, your culture, that is not a national thing or anything to do with skin color..its all about tribe or what you consider your tribe or what is familiar to you. There are plenty of Irish born non whites who are against the mass immigration, are they racist ? if we are all truly equal, and there should be no such thing as borders and people think we should be able to come and go as we please, then are white people not the minority then in terms of global population ? This confuses the woke people.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I think we need to carefully consider whether these numbers of migrants compose of those staying/working for a few years (temporary visas) or those who are aiming to become citizens. 30k migrants a year all of whom are eligible to become citizens would seriously affect the social fabric of Ireland. When I lived in Oz, they had a limit on the numbers who could gain residency for that year. That makes sense. Place a cap on the numbers who can gain residency, but also a cap on those who can gain citizenship. Place some value on having both statuses beyond the obvious gains of employment or benefits. Honestly, I'd be happy with a more stringent testing of applicants for citizenship. Temp visas for sponsored work positions can be handed out like candy, because people aren't entitled to much under such a scheme... however, we should be placing potential citizens under an investigatory period of say, ten years, during which they meet certain standards (employment, lack of criminality, etc) before they become citizens. And this shouldn't be open to students, but only those who can work.. let's have migrants who can actually provide something to the nation. That probationary period shouldn't include the time spent under a working visa. We are a first world nation with plenty of offer migrants wanting to settle here. Why the rush to accept those who won't contribute properly to the nation?
Deleted User wrote: » I'd be genuinely interested in your figures. For reference I've previously stated that I'd be happy with Macrons proposal for France to be implemented in Ireland. He wants a cap of 30,000 non EU immigrants a year allowed into France, that would give Ireland a nett immigration figure of 2,000 non EU per year. We had 10 times that in 2019.
Wibbs wrote: » As I say we have enough homegrown social problems and they don't come cheap socially or financially, so why import more? Some misplaced form of charity? Charity, as the saying goes, begins at home.
bubblypop wrote: » How many do you think we should allow in?
Deleted User wrote: » By definition if we stop 1 person entering Ireland we have "controlled" immigration. It's just another tactic you use to stop discussion. What we have is mass immigration and no there isn't a dictionary definition of it but the numbers per head of population have us right up there on a worldwide basis.
decreds wrote: » This. I'd love to know the root cause, i'm leaning towards social engineering in western culture think feminism, wokeness etc. Our children are now being brain washed. I like to picture these people as trolls living at home and under 18 but the sad reality is some of these people will somehow become politicians someday. While most will just claim benefits and blame society while self declaring as "artists" or some sh1te like that.
[Deleted User] wrote: » By definition if we stop 1 person entering Ireland we have "controlled" immigration. It's just another tactic you use to stop discussion. What we have is mass immigration and no there isn't a dictionary definition of it but the numbers per head of population have us right up there on a worldwide basis.
bubblypop wrote: » Where is the uncontrolled immigration? Not in Ireland, because we have controlled immigration.
decreds wrote: » The posters making outlandish claims like "there's no illegal immigrants in Ireland" or "all immigrants add value". They can also be identified by the thrash and baseless claims they spout and debate purely on emotion and display next to no capacity for logical thought. You have a search engine, type "what does woke actually mean" and hit enter.
decreds wrote: » This right here, if a political party approached uncontrolled reckless immigration that we are suffering from this point of view they would have my vote and over half a dozen within my family alone.
bubblypop wrote: » What bleeding hearts/woke posters? What does woke actually mean?
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » never mind a leg, they have not got even the fact rights,. they make a claim, based on nothing, then when asked to back up said claim they deflect. They then change tactics and make outright ludicrous claims, and when they are dispelled,deflection mode comes to the fore again. That is not counting the outright lies posted, things like "there are no illegal immigrants here" or how illegals not paying tax, and depriving the Irish of jobs is a supposed benefit for us, despite our own irish people made to wait longer for housing. some people seem almost ashamed to be irish and despise any semblance of irish culture or heritage.
decreds wrote: » bleeding hearts/woke posters .
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Undocumented are not EU citizens, they are unlikely to be earning high wages. That is what was mentioned
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » so why are the people coming here...illegally as well ? They come because they can manipulate the system....simple as that, and people like seem to think that is fine
bubblypop wrote: » But we don't deliberately import persons who will be on welfare?
Justin Credible Darts wrote: » They come because they can manipulate the system....simple as that, and people like seem to think that is fine
My first post on the thread wrote: Because it doesn't work out too well long term and this is repeated in every European nation that tried it, or were forced into it by their history of colonialism. It doesn't work out too well for the immigrant population, even many generations in and unrest on the back of disenfranchisement is a given to kick off. It nearly always also depends on the demographics involved. Those who look the least like "natives" get the worst end of the deal.
bubblypop wrote: » Do you see all the replies to you? All talk about low paid or unskilled migrants. Or illegal immigrants. Because that's what they automatically think when anyone mentions immigrants. In their heads, immigrants are a drain on our society. And they will try to justify that belief. Even though you didn't mention anything about that.