coffee_cake wrote: » Did you jump from 120 to 140? Id do a single at 130 if that's close to your max
new2tri19 wrote: » Yeah 120 straight to 140, I've been following Alf's advice of working up in sets of whatever your max rep attempt is going to be . So after a set of 5 at 120 I was thinking I'll make 5 at 130 but it might hinder my attempt at 140. My max is 150. 140 for 5 was always going to be hard ., None of them came straight up .
Alf Veedersane wrote: » It's still probably too big a jump on a set of 5 but I get it. That said, I'd probably have gone for 130x5 and gauged on that. Its sufficiently within what you've done for 4 that you should be able for a heavier set of 5. If that ended up with you doing 130x5 and then 135x5, is that worse than just doing 140x5? But I know what it's like to want to jump to a number based on previous numbers. But just don't lose sight of the fact that you don't need to be chasing numbers on top sets. Sure, you want them to be on the money but take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Your progress will be driven be volume. If you tested in a week, doing 140x5 or 130x5 followed by 135x5 isn't going to be the biggest factor for what you might max on. Going to a top set let's you feel a heavier weight but the volume is what's building the foundation. So don't get too caught up in that top set and let how it feels guide you...taking jumps that are that big make it hard to gauge by feel. Its still early days and in the longer term, I think it would serve you well to take smaller jumps coming to the heavy weights so you understand the difference of how X weight feels for a set of 5 and how it feels at 10kg heavier (for a deadlift) because it just let's you understand the difference in feel with more accuracy for you and that will stand to you.
new2tri19 wrote: » Yeah your right 100% and I needed to hear that thanks . If I'm totally honest I had 140 X 5 in my head as my target before I started the session . Need to change that mindset of constantly chasing PB's I should of just done 130 X 5 then 135 X 5 that would be 10 lifts instead of the 5 I did. Sets of 5 RM are tough especially at the heavier weights even with chalk my grip started to fail on last rep at 120 it was just hanging on my fingers . I used straps for 140 lift . I'm getting near my absolute max I'm putting everything I've got into these lifts . I had in my head earlier next week will I go for 145 X 3 or 150, now I'll scrap that and do 120-130-135-140-145 and be happy to stop anywhere along the list. I keep making the mistake of viewing the pb lift as the beneficial lift bit it's the volume sets on the way up that I should be concentrating on. Thanks
new2tri19 wrote: » That was one of the reasons I felt I had to get a true 5 rep max because the working sets are 90% of that number so if I had of stopped at 130 for 5 would of been 117 instead of 127. But I get your point thanks
Alf Veedersane wrote: » If you felt you hadn't enough to go for a heavier set of 5 with 132.5/135/137.5/140, so be it. You'll do more reps with 117 than 127....they're both in a range where you'll be doing a lot of work in (117 is 72% of projected max, 127 is 78%). Your top sets aren't going to be an absolute max anyway. Most people leave a rep or two in the tank on their top sets because it doesn't need to be an absolute max for it and the back-offs to be beneficial.
new2tri19 wrote: » When I picked this program it looked fairly idiot proof, it's amazing how many little tweaks in mindset/techniques / weight selection are needed to get the maximum benefit from the program . I used to wonder why people would pay for a.coach but it's fairly evident that there is lots of things that new lifters just don't see and/or intuitively get correctly . Everyday is a schoolday as they say . Thanks again
Dtp1979 wrote: » Squat 7 days a week?????????
Dtp1979 wrote: » Jaysus that’s a fair workload. That’ll serve you well in strength training, young Ronnie Coleman
new2tri19 wrote: » :D Ronnie Coleman ! It used to be alot more training I was looking at some memories on Facebook from 2019 and it's frightening how thin I was at around 59-62kg , doing 2-3 hours cardio a day no breakfast , ate very little meat because it upset my runs , was drinking oat milk because milk would give me heartrun and I'd run at least once a day . I was probably on 1200-1500 calories a day and destroying myself . No idea of protein if I got hungry I'd eat cereal bars all quick carbs.
new2tri19 wrote: » Weight and measurements Starting weight 78kg - finishing at 77kg , I expected a bigger weight increase tbh considering I started supplementing with creatine as well . .
Patsy167 wrote: » Should that be 87kg as the ending weight?
Dtp1979 wrote: » God I hope it wasn’t the abwheel challenge that hurt you!! Good thing summer is coming. Suns out......Biceps 7 days a week.
Dtp1979 wrote: » https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zDurZ3SS8NE