Flinty997 wrote: » Isn't Taiwan China cough cough...and an Island. Vietnam is whole different story.
Deleted User wrote: » Maybe thats because the ruling party in Ireland changes every few years. China has had the same one for 72 years. The CCP is a relatively small number of people. I think it is reasonable to refer to the actions of the CCP, not the 1.1 billion people they rule.
Deleted User wrote: » Do you refer to India's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) when talking about what India has done? Do you do the same with the US with regards to their two parties? I doubt it.
About 15% of China’s population has been vaccinated against COVID-19, as of Sunday
25% of eligible population has received at least one dose of Covid-19 vaccine....10 per cent of the eligible population had received a second dose of the vaccines.
Flinty997 wrote: » So how is China getting on. Better than us.https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ireland-just-surpassed-china-in-the-number-of-confirmed-covid-19-deaths-how-on-earth-did-that-happen-2021-04-21 Whereas in Ireland,https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/almost-25-of-eligible-population-has-received-at-least-one-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-1.4545673
fvp4 wrote: » The idea that China is a total fortress is just not true. I work with 3 guys in China, and it’s clear they are out and about and living their lives as normal.
Deleted User wrote: » My only source of first hand information is in Shaghai, but there life is back to normal. Everything is open. They are faster for implementing restrictions. If the CCP decided they needed another lockdown, it would start at, say, 3pm that day, and they would have no qualms announcing it at 2.30pm. Here, Michael Martin would announce it on a Monday to start at midnight on Thursday. China had hotel quarantines last March. It took us a year to implement them here.
Deleted User wrote: » What exactly is your problem with me referring to the CCP?
I don't follow much news in India. When the US does something yes, I might refer to the actions of Biden or his predecessor, what was his name again? Yesterday was the Queens Speech in the UK. It wasn't the speech of the people of the United Kingdom.
Flinty997 wrote: » Fair enough. But they've had surges, they've had breakouts. So its not gone. Its still around.
On one one hand we say they keep having lock downs, but on the other side we are told they are back to normal, and none knows anyone who has ever had Covid. Massive schools not one case. I'm not saying it all can't be true. But its weird and inconsistent.
Flinty997 wrote: » They had people having gigantic pool parties in Wuhan back in Aug. They Lifted their lockdown 9 months ago. That's all pre vaccine. So they did all this without vaccines. Which is amazing.
archer22 wrote: » What's all the "CCP" nonsense here The name of the country is "The Peoples Republic of China" or PRC. Those who keep calling it the CCP obviously have an agenda not an opinion :rolleyes:
[Deleted User] wrote: » Because it's a stance that directs a bias. By focusing on the CCP all the time, as opposed to the PRC/China, you lose neutrality, due to all the negative associations linked to the CCP. I find it reinforces the pushing of an agenda. ...
[Deleted User] wrote: » Its not in the least bit amazing. They totally locked down in the one city at the epicentre. They have huge internal restrictions on travel. They tightly controlled external travel. Also this claim that the virus could only have been fully defeated with vaccines is not true either. It won't in fact be defeated with Vaccines, we will need boosters every so often. There will be breakouts and china had some.
Flinty997 wrote: » Who claiming the virus would be fully defeated? The idea is that lockdown and containment is a stop gap until you get herd immunity with a vaccine. That brings the number of cases down to a manageable level so you can exit lockdown and resume normal activities. It's not that the virus disappears. China opened up before the vaccines. That's what people are reporting here, that is all back to normal in China and no sign of any cases. The opposite happened here first lockdown worked well, but as soon as we relaxed it exploded and it's taken almost 6 months to get back to where we were. We needed the vaccine to get there aswell. Chinese didn't. Amazing really.
DaSilva wrote: » I think it is because our lockdowns were done to mitigate disease, we ended lockdown when case numbers were very low. On the other hand in China they used their lockdown to eradicate the virus (at least until it gets reintroduced). So they identified all cases by doing mass testing of entire cities that were under lockdown, and when cases were 0 they opened up. I don't blame you for not believing it or being suspicious, it is hard to imagine that is possible, but it seems it is, because it would be very hard for them to conceal an epidemic in their big cities.
DaSilva wrote: » .... in China they used their lockdown to eradicate the virus (at least until it gets reintroduced). ....
thebaz wrote: » or you could see it as a way of not blaming the Chinese people for accusations of negligense or misinformation, but the CCP have questions to answer, given damage caused to rest of world. How virus originated is a legitimate and important question, since we dont want it to happen again.
Flinty997 wrote: » Well on one hand we say it's impossible to have 0 cases, then we flip and say China has 0 cases. Regardless of what China does or said. This thread on its own constantly contradicts itself.
archer22 wrote: » In fairness you will never see anybody in China or anywhere in East Asia putting up a Marquee to have an auld hooley during the Pandemic and stating they are happy to accept the consequences!. The "consequences" would be Tanks driving over it, not a contribution to the local poor box
[Deleted User] wrote: » How so? I can't recall of anyone who said that they believed the statistics released by China regarding their numbers. ....
archer22 wrote: » So your're assuming the government of China caused the pandemic I thought the generally accepted source of the pandemic was a wet market in Wuhan. Unless you have some proof the market was owned and run by the Chinese ruling party otherwise your point is moot.