Deleted User wrote: » So, why should people be allowed to discuss anything at all?
Deleted User wrote: » Unhappy with the direction of the thread, contribute, and steer it in the direction of your own bias...
DaSilva wrote: » I haven't told anyone their opinion is allowed or not, nor have I said what should be discussed in this thread or not, I simply gave my opinion on how discussion seems to be so often more concerned with underlying politics than the pandemic itself. Sorry that this has triggered you. I'm only unhappy that I am still discussing this weird meta-argument with you, where you unironically seem to be opposed to me sharing my opinion in this thread. I'm done with this little side track now personally.
Hodger wrote: » I just finished watching this sky news Australia report on China in relation to covid its an interesting watch.
Deleted User wrote: » SkyNews Australia, and most of the other Australian media stations are incredibly anti-China... going out of their way to post every kind of story that relates to China headed towards war. Australia has been engaging in a propaganda wave for the last two years... So, I'd take any report from them with a hefty pinch of salt.
archer22 wrote: » Australia for some strange reason considers itself to be the Pacific superpower :pac:
nc6000 wrote: » I thought this was interesting in relation to claims China may not be telling us the whole story re the origins of Covid.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/10/anger-as-chinese-safari-park-kept-leopard-breakout-from-the-public-for-nearly-a-week
archer22 wrote: » Now that's what you call desperation!
nc6000 wrote: » Desperation? I'm just making an observation that Chinese authorities mightn't be the most forthcoming with information.
MikeSoys wrote: » will be interesting if CCP makes a move against its next weakpoint (or beachead) that is Taiwan,
thebaz wrote: » havn't posted or read a Covid thread for a good while - has ther been any further update on how the virus started in Wuhan ?? Is it still considered an accident from the wet-market or an accident from virus centre or what ? Am actually surprised the media are not asking similar questions, I find it so hard to understand also how China did not get a second wave, given what happened in Europe, India and U.S. and Brazil.
nc6000 wrote: » I haven't seen any recent update or further investigation into the origin of Covid. You're probably asking in the wrong place too with the number of pro- China posters in here.
Deleted User wrote: » And there is a conspiracy forum if you want to discuss Covid-19 made in a lab. This thread is about how China is getting on, and the poster you were responding to can't even get their heads around why they haven't experienced the same waves, when it's primary level stuff.
thebaz wrote: » I am that poster , is it so far fetched that it escaped from a lab in Wuhan , given ther is such a lab ther ???
and given the CCP were so slow and not exactlty transperent to the WHO fact finding mission into virus origins.
And no I cant get my head around the fact that the virus only really effected one city in China, and that ther have been only 91,000 cases in China and 4,600 deaths from Covid, given virus originated in China, and the massive number of cases in most other country's . Not so ****ing Primary.
thebaz wrote: » I am that poster , is it so far fetched that it escaped from a lab in Wuhan , given ther is such a lab ther ??? and given the CCP were so slow and not exactlty transperent to the WHO fact finding mission into virus origins. And no I cant get my head around the fact that the virus only really effected one city in China, and that ther have been only 91,000 cases in China and 4,600 deaths from Covid, given virus originated in China, and the massive number of cases in most other country's . Not so ****ing Primary.
DaSilva wrote: » I think their last weapon against covid is one that nobody has anywhere else in the world is their surveillance state,
Deleted User wrote: » Their installation and operation of surveillance is limited to particular cities (1st tier).. not the whole country. In the 2nd tier, installation and monitoring is far behind that of the primary cities, and even then, considering the sheer sizes of Beijing and Guangzhou, actual coverage would be limited to particular districts. Most of China doesn't have that kind of technological focus. It's still very much done by the police on the ground, and even then, there's never going to be enough to provide the coverage that many here seem to think is common. No.. China's advantage is that it's still very much a community driven society, where gossip and passing of information is commonplace. Word spreads on issues... very quickly if you're in the loop, so people would know quickly if someone was sick. Considering how dense Chinese cities/towns tend to be, communities know each others business quite well, and a word to the local police would be easily done.
Deleted User wrote: » It is when there is zero evidence, beyond a variety of opinion pieces. When you can produce some solid evidence that it happened, then, it steps out of the conspiracy theory category.