PeterPan92 wrote: » Did you read what I said? The unions don't want teachers to be vaccinated before vulnerable people. They want us moved to group 9, for crowded settings. That's it.
shtpEdthePlum wrote: » I made a conscious decision to leave the teaching profession just as the pandemic started. It was partly because i wanted a change of career, i had done it straight out of college and wanted to try new things. A big opportunity came up so i jumped at the chance. Mostly it was because a huge majority of people in this country (including some among my friends and family) absolutely shat all over the profession. It's hard to do a demanding job if people personally resent you because of it. Anyway good luck to the poor children currently growing up with fewer and fewer capable, experienced educators. This is genuinely how dictators prevail, they turn the public against the education system, defund it as a populist maneuver and the resulting population is left easy to manipulate.
jusvi2001 wrote: » No wonder why teachers are loosing public supporthttps://m.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/independentie-poll-results-revealed-majority-supportvaccine-prioritisation-for-gardai-but-not-teachers-40285891.html
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Meat factories along with bakeries, actually any food productuin factories are the same, they work. In crowded settings and prodiheyhe food you eat to live. What's more essential? Noone is calling for them to be vaccinated before more vulnerable people because its common sense they shouldn't.
PeterPan92 wrote: » At this point the unions are doing their job. They are fighting for what was promised and assured back in February and was a central crux in getting schools open. Whether or not their members vote on industrial action is a separate matter. The unions are fighting for an unfulfilled promise and that is what I'm paying them for. I don't know if I'll vote for or against yet, but I'm glad they are doing something considering I pay them every 2 weeks. For everyone going on about the gardaí, bus drivers, retail workers, etc., these were also all promised priority vaccinations initially. However, the INTO, ASTI and TUI are hardly going to fight for Mary working in Tesco when Mary doesn't pay them. They are going to fight for the teachers who do pay them (and pay them a pretty penny, I might add!). The unions for the gardaí, bus drivers, retail workers etc. need to do better by their members also. The unions are not demanding immediate vaccination either. They are looking for teachers to be moved from group 10 to group 9. Group 9 is for those working in crowded settings. I have 27 kids in my class, and have one of the smaller classes in the school. Some of the classes have 30+ children. Would you say these classrooms are not a crowded setting?
seamus wrote: » I agree, but I have sympathy with teachers on this. Unions are often a bit of a racket, teachers' unions in particular. Speak out against the union, actively display disapproval of what they're doing, and you will find yourself blackballed when the time comes to apply for a new position or asked to be moved to a new class. Be vocal enough and you'll also find yourself eating alone at lunch, being refused favours for time off and being assigned yard duty during the coldest and wettest days. All of the public sector unions have a certain gangster feel to them, where you pay homage to the union if you want to retain any sense of job satisfaction in your life. So I wouldn't blame any teachers for being cautious about actively disagreeing with the union.
namloc1980 wrote: » I'd be mortified if I was a teacher paying union subs to get this nonsense. They have no public support for this. Shameful.
lulublue22 wrote: » I’d disagree with that - Forsa are very good at representing their members and will be vocal when they feel the time is right. Interesting that you feel SNAs have a justified voice- I presume you feel that teachers in special schools also have a justified voice - given that any special school I’ve worked in all staff including teachers have been involved in care needs.
SusanC10 wrote: » How far along with we be realistically with the Vaccine Rollout before Schools re-open for the next Academic Year late-August / early- September? I know, crystal ball etc but best educated guess.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » My point is their justified voice has now been drowned out by the selfishness of the other 3 unions and the members that pay them dues.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » I really think that teachers that oppose what these unions are doing should collectively voice their opposition. You really need to distance yourself from this. Perhaps throw a few quid each into a fund and pay for a full page advertisement in all the National newspapers stating that this is NOT IN YOUR NAME.
lulublue22 wrote: » I think you know the answer to that question already though I don’t know nor care really what point you are trying to make. I answered a poster in good faith re SNAs and representation.
Random sample wrote: » Or maybe, when it comes to the vote next September... just vote no?
coleen wrote: » There is a lot of unfairness and hard to decide who should be prioritised. I work in a primary school but in a pre-school and I see no mention of any Early years staff who have to give a lot of help to small children toileting and lunches and comforting during the day. We will be at the end of the list but yet we went back way before any teachers, we have to supply our own ppe and we earn alot less money. So as I say lots of unfairness around !
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » Were FORSA one of the 3 unions that got together yesterday?